Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29] 30 31 ... 37
Author Topic: The 5120 hack - Running up to 5bar absolute pressure on ME7.x  (Read 334337 times)
elRey
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +32/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 565


« Reply #420 on: October 14, 2014, 09:58:31 AM »

maybe 10 hPa diff in lde is nothing to worry about when setting (unsetting really) B_lddy.
« Last Edit: October 14, 2014, 10:01:37 AM by elRey » Logged
phila_dot
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +173/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709


« Reply #421 on: October 14, 2014, 10:27:49 AM »

I will have to check my xdf/file.

I know that I addressed this.
« Last Edit: October 14, 2014, 10:29:29 AM by phila_dot » Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Online Online

Posts: 12270


WWW
« Reply #422 on: October 14, 2014, 10:31:38 AM »

I will have to check my xdf/file.

I know that I addressed this.

Can you cross ref with the 5120 file posted by me? I'd like to know if i'm posting known bad images Sad
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Online Online

Posts: 12270


WWW
« Reply #423 on: October 14, 2014, 10:40:15 AM »

in BGRLP-BPSPMV there is a division by 2.0. Should this division constant (2.0) be rescaled? This would affect psp_w .


mov     dpsmp_w_word_382038, r5
mov     r7, r5
sub     r7, dpsdvs_w_word_382036
jmpr    cc_NV, loc_86BB58
mov     r7, #8000h
subc    r7, #0

loc_86BB58:                             ; CODE XREF: BGRLP+2DE
ashr    r7, #1     ; division by 2
add     r7, dpsfg_w_word_381E58



I'm not seeing this in 551M... is this for a different ecu?
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
elRey
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +32/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 565


« Reply #424 on: October 14, 2014, 10:44:48 AM »

Yes, that's from the well documented TT file.
Logged
phila_dot
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +173/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709


« Reply #425 on: October 16, 2014, 08:25:40 PM »

What are you doing for the hard coded 10 hPa in LDRPID-MAIN for Hysteresis to set B_lddy ?

It's 8bit and hard coded #1. So, it can't be divided. Does that mean B_lddy is broken now? Or at least now considered 20 hPa (twice the left set value for Hysteresis)?

Not an issue in S4 M box.

B_lddy is set if lde > 0 and less than UMDYLDR, clear otherwise.
Logged
phila_dot
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +173/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709


« Reply #426 on: October 16, 2014, 08:27:50 PM »

Can you cross ref with the 5120 file posted by me? I'd like to know if i'm posting known bad images Sad

I will check it out in the next few weeks.

I ended up including everything, even if not applicable due to CW. For example, I have a TON of BKV stuff in there.
Logged
elRey
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +32/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 565


« Reply #427 on: October 17, 2014, 10:20:17 AM »

My effort on 032HS file
Logged
elRey
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +32/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 565


« Reply #428 on: October 17, 2014, 08:07:05 PM »

Not an issue in S4 M box.

B_lddy is set if lde > 0 and less than UMDYLDR, clear otherwise.


Hmmm. I read the FR as b_lddy is set above UMDYLDR and cleared when lde falls below 10hPa.

10 vs 0 hPa I can see being different without deviating from FR. But B_lddy not being set above UMDYLDR on the M-box greatly differs from my FR understanding.

But I've never looked at the mbox. I'm wondering if changing the 10hPa to 0 would be better than leaving it at the rescaled 20hPa, to be more like the mbox.
Logged
phila_dot
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +173/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709


« Reply #429 on: October 17, 2014, 09:17:31 PM »

The factor is 10, so 1h is 10hpa.

Yes, you are correct. I wrote that too quickly.

B_lddy is clear if lde <= 0 and set if lde > UMDYLDR.
Logged
Bische
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +25/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 397



WWW
« Reply #430 on: December 19, 2014, 03:54:09 PM »

What are you doing for the hard coded 10 hPa in LDRPID-MAIN for Hysteresis to set B_lddy ?

It's 8bit and hard coded #1. So, it can't be divided. Does that mean B_lddy is broken now? Or at least now considered 20 hPa (twice the left set value for Hysteresis)?

10 or 20 hpa hysteresis wont make a world difference for B_lddy, it is a ver small increase vs. what a sway in boost would make for performance.
Logged
aef
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +69/-46
Offline Offline

Posts: 1601


« Reply #431 on: May 25, 2015, 07:55:50 AM »

I tried to implement this into my S3 AMK/BAM ecu but i endet up with a lumpy and little bit richer idle and rough gear change.

Attached you will find a log
Logged
automan001
Full Member
***

Karma: +47/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 153


« Reply #432 on: May 27, 2015, 05:45:58 AM »

Thanks everybody for the info you shared! Using posts in this thread + FR + IDA + 3 sleepless nignts I've successfully converted my 1.8T 032HN1 box to 5 bar.  First run at idle was impressive, I didn't expect much success from the first run. Night run on full load & full boost was amazing. Everything is under control. I observe no issues after conversion. Pressure sensor readings in logs were initially divided by 2, so I had to multiply by 2 corresponding me7log variables to compensate. From the logs I see that ps_w reading is correct, rl_w is also good and as expected, lamsoni_w shows proper numbers. It's cool to have more than 2.5 bar boost fully controllable. Increased my everyday boost to +1.65 bar & limited torque a little bit on 1-st and 2-nd gears, 3-rd gear now pulls very strong. But now with such pressure and +30C outside, my intake air is slightly hot (50-60C), so I will need to think about bigger intercooler.
« Last Edit: May 28, 2015, 02:49:38 AM by automan001 » Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Online Online

Posts: 12270


WWW
« Reply #433 on: July 15, 2015, 12:05:51 PM »

Updated original post to include two more pu related code patches.

See also http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=3027.msg63024#msg63024
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
desch
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 9


« Reply #434 on: August 03, 2015, 07:55:33 AM »

Which 3.0 bar sensor part number is best for working with the reference 5120 m-box bin? I only see 4.0 bar part numbers mentioned in this thread.
« Last Edit: August 03, 2015, 08:02:27 AM by desch » Logged
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29] 30 31 ... 37
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.031 seconds with 18 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)