Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Lean After 5200 rpm  (Read 17513 times)
phila_dot
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +173/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709


« Reply #15 on: May 06, 2013, 02:56:43 PM »

That could be the problem. That's too close. Any reason that you didn't just use the rear O2 bung?

Wideband sensors are extremely sensitive to temperature and exhaust pressure.

It definitely looks like the problem is with your sensor, gauge, or installation.
Logged
vdubnation
Turboman
Global Moderator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: +49/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 433


« Reply #16 on: May 06, 2013, 02:59:11 PM »

i ordered a new sensor and going relocate further back
i have custom piping from down pipe all the way back never had rear o2's
Logged
krazydbiker
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 202


« Reply #17 on: May 13, 2013, 05:57:13 PM »

any updates on this? i'm pretty interested to see what the cause was.
Logged
vdubnation
Turboman
Global Moderator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: +49/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 433


« Reply #18 on: May 13, 2013, 07:47:34 PM »

got a new sensor gonna drop it in this week and move the sensor back towards where a rear o2 would go
Logged
userpike
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +22/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 763


« Reply #19 on: May 13, 2013, 08:15:53 PM »

i ordered a new sensor and going relocate further back
i have custom piping from down pipe all the way back never had rear o2's

It seems logical to me to put the sensor bung as close to the stock position of the S1 sensor/s as possible. maybe even the same distance from the turbo as the stock bung, just at the opposite inverse position or other acceptable angle on the exhaust pipe. Not good if they line up with each other and the flow. I suspect one of the sensors would get a bad reading because the one in front of it would be deflecting gas flow if they were very close together. just a thought really..I have no data that supports this "theory".  I put my wideband sensor next to the stock S1 position on the DP at a different angle as if you were looking into the pipe. It works just fine, very responsive and I can reference it against the stock S1 sensor (mine's a factory wideband) and vice versa.

I did put my EGT sensor as close to the turbo outlet as I could though. I thought about welding in bungs(EGT) for each cylinder(1.8T) but maybe after I graduate from novice to amateur tuner as I'm not that good yet to tune individual cylinders...I wrote my first tune the other day, I had a successful flash and the car didn't blow up, so YaY for me.

I think what Phila meant when he asked why you didn't use the rear o2 bung is because chances are you deleted it in your tune and the bung is there still and not being used. Not that it's the best place to put it, but most convenient. but not for you since your custom exhaust never had them installed  Cheesy
« Last Edit: May 13, 2013, 08:28:36 PM by userpike » Logged
vdubnation
Turboman
Global Moderator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: +49/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 433


« Reply #20 on: May 13, 2013, 08:22:56 PM »

i have seen tons of cars running them as closest possible to the turbo outlet getting accurate readings i got my car with it placed there never thought anything of it . All i could think of is it made read more accurate but kill the sensor quicker .
« Last Edit: May 13, 2013, 08:44:51 PM by vdubnation » Logged
userpike
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +22/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 763


« Reply #21 on: May 13, 2013, 08:40:04 PM »

i have seen tons of cars running them as closest possible to the down pipe getting accurate readings i got my car with it placed there never thought anything of it . All i could think of is it made read more accurate but kill the sensor quicker .

Did you mean as close as possible to the turbo outlet? If so, I have seen this also and shared your thoughts about reliability but not accuracy. I'm not so sure accuracy would be better. I haven't researched much about this subject though.

derr... I just thought of this. swap the sensor plugs and run it to see if you get the same results.
« Last Edit: May 13, 2013, 08:44:11 PM by userpike » Logged
phila_dot
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +173/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709


« Reply #22 on: May 13, 2013, 08:51:36 PM »

Do some more research on WB O2 sensors.

Simply looking at the FR can give some insight.
Logged
vdubnation
Turboman
Global Moderator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: +49/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 433


« Reply #23 on: June 19, 2013, 09:47:50 PM »

So i fixed the issue of the car going super lean after 5200 rpm. I ripped apart my plumbing and tested everything made sure everything was on tight. At WOT my afr now is a steady 11.4 car runs ok at higher rpm it feels like theirs a little hesitation. Also the car feels slow. Everything is less than 2000 miles old. New turbo new maf new everything. When i run the car with the maf unplugged it feels a little quicker and less hesitation.

Heres my most recent log. I also moved the uego o2 to the proper place.

Thanks Guys
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12270


WWW
« Reply #24 on: June 20, 2013, 02:02:09 PM »

Pretty much everything is a mess there.

Your req AFR is a mess

Your boost isn't even close to requested.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.02 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)