Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Input - for a stage1, ME7.6.4  (Read 19981 times)
Tb205gti
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 52


« on: November 02, 2013, 11:50:30 AM »

Hello Folks, think this might be my first post on this forum. I'm not new to remapping, I have been remapping EDC15C2 for close to 8 years now, I have had results that not many others have been able to reprodue. Smiley

..but the Diesel is sold and I have bought an Opel Insignia 1.6T instead. As far as I have found out it's an ME7.6.4.
Now I want ot remap it myself, it will be a fairly simple Stage1 tune with a decat (only the first cat, not the seond.)

I have a Damos for the ME7.5, I'm using this as a basis for defining the maps in the ME 7.6.4. This is where I need assistance from you guys. Smiley

I'm not looking for a cookbook recipe on how to make a stage 2, but I'd like to get some hints and critique on my progress.

This is my ori: [I HAVE REMOVED IT, IT WAS A TUNEFILE!]

I *think* I have some of the maps needed identified, can anybody verify?

- LDRXN 16x1 @ A6342 (Max specified load, this can roughly be translated into a boostcurve? (10xvalue+300-Atmos pressure). max is around 155, this gives me about 1.8bar absolute pressure. Correct?
- KFLDHBN 8x8 @ A14FA (Boostpressure limiter from atmospheric pressure? What are the axis, atmos pressure and rpm?)
- NFSM 6x1 @ A16F8. (Idle speed when rolling in gear? Axis is coolant temperature?)
- NLLM 6x1 @ A16FE (idle when stationary, no gear? Axis is coolant temperature?)

Now I have what seems like 6 KFPED maps
@ 9D73C
@ 9D8BC
@ 9DA3C
@ 9DBBC
@ 9DD3C
@ 9DEBC

Is it one per gear? They have the same values all 6 of them. Or is some of them for AT and some for MT? What is output of these, I thought it was load, but using 0,003052 as factor and max I get in the maps is ~105

-KFMIOP 11x16 @ 9D1E8 (is output engine efficiency in percent?)
-KFMIRL 16x16 @ 9C84A
-KFWDKMSN 6x16 @ 9C6AA (Throttle angle map)
-KFMSNWDK 6x16 @ 9C04E
-KFMLDMX 9x8 @ 9BEEA (max airflow though MAF?)
-KFZWMS 16x12 @ 99FB5 (Latest allowed ignition angle?)
-KFZWOP 11x16 @ 990C5 (optimal ignition angle)
-LAMFA 6x15 @ A5075 (Y axis is rpm, but what about the X-axis? Seems axis's are defined just in front of the map, but the X-axis does not make much sense to me)


These I'm more unsure of:
KFTATM? 8x8 @ A03DF (EGT model map, used for the EGT model?)
KFTATM? 8x8 @ A049D (EGT model map, used for the EGT model?)

I know that not all of the above are needed for a stage1 tune, but this is what I have been able to find so far. What do I more need to look for, for a simple stage1 tune?
The enrichment map when over the EGT limit (I cannot remember the name of it..)

I hope you are willing to point me in the right direction, not a lot of information on the ME7.6.4. :/
« Last Edit: November 08, 2013, 01:53:21 PM by Tb205gti » Logged
terminator
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +15/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 424


« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2013, 04:51:14 PM »

The enrichment map when over the EGT limit is KFLBTS A0EFE 16x12

LAMFA A5076
x-axis = KFPED values.
Logged
maZer.GTi
Full Member
***

Karma: +68/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 246


« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2013, 05:06:47 PM »

The enrichment map when over the EGT limit is KFLBTS A0EFE 16x12

LAMFA A5076
x-axis = KFPED values.

Lamfa is using requested torque not Pedal Position!
mrfa_w {DriverRequestedRelTorque}

Sorry for correction terminator Cheesy
Logged
terminator
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +15/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 424


« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2013, 05:12:51 PM »

Forget it!  Grin
Logged
Tb205gti
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 52


« Reply #4 on: November 03, 2013, 10:59:06 AM »

The enrichment map when over the EGT limit is KFLBTS A0EFE 16x12

LAMFA A5076
x-axis = KFPED values.

Ahh, I had it defiend @ A5075 - the req. torque axis did look a bit "off". Smiley

Logged
Tb205gti
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 52


« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2013, 11:18:23 AM »

I have a few more. Smiley

I'm unsure of the two here, they are max and min flow through MAF - but why are they so far apart? I would have thought they would be close to each other?

-KFMLDMN 9x8 @ A4670
-KFMLDMX 9x8 @ 9BEEA

-KFLDRL 10x16 @ A64B4 (is this the "Wastegate DutyCycle map"? The map that is the precontrol value for the LDR PID?)

-KFLDIMX 8x16 @ A6362
-KFRI 6x7 @ A219D
-KFRP 6x7 @ A21C7

...Now this is a map that I anticipate to use to limit the torque in the lower gears.
-KFFRTMKI 8x6 @ A1961 (is the outout the factor to multiply with the requested torque?) (Oviously values above 1 does not make sense)

-LAMLGMTM 12x1 @ A1082 (The lean limit?)
-KFLBTS 12x16 @ A0EFE (This can be used to lower the lambda when EGT is over a given setpoint?)
-KFLF 16x12 @ A0A97 (Lambda at partload, can this be manipulated to give a slightly leaner burn during cruise? or is this a bad idea?)
-FZWSTNM 6x1 @ 9E97D (ignition angle during start?)

Now some values I *think* can be "abused" to prevent catalytic diagnose..

-TMSUKTD 1x1 @ A0567
Now std. this is -10.5 degrees C. If I raise this to eg. 120, will it prevent catdiagnose when engine temp during start is less than 120 ?

-TMNKATT 1x1 @ A0566
If this is raised to eg. 1200, will it prevent the cat diagnose being performed with a tester?

-TMINKAT 1x1 @ A0565
If this is raised to eg. 1200, will it prevent the cat diagnose being performed while driving?

-TMAXKAT 1x1 @ A0564
What happens if this is set lower than TMINKAT? I suppose the ecu gets quite upset.. Could the catmonitoring be "disabled" by setting max to eg. 100 and lower to 98 ?

-RLKTDHB 1x1 @  A0563
Maximum load for cat diagnose? what is I set this to 10 ? Will it prevent cat diagnose @ loads above 10 ?

I know the above is not the "right" way of disabling the cat monitoring/diagnose - but I'd like to keep the second lambda sensor in place and have everything look "normal" on a tester. Am I barking up the wrong tree here?

Logged
TCSTigersClaw
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +15/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 353



« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2013, 05:31:06 AM »

-KFLDRL 10x16 @ A64B4 (is this the "Wastegate DutyCycle map"? The map that is the precontrol value for the LDR PID?)
)
KFLBTS 12x16 @ A0EFE (This can be used to lower the lambda when EGT is over a given setpoint?)
-KFLF 16x12 @ A0A97 (Lambda at partload, can this be manipulated to give a slightly leaner burn during cruise? or is this a bad idea?)


KFLDRL is POST PID Linearization of N75 DC %
KFLBTS is exactly what you say as long as KFLBTS is lower than LAMFA
EGT setpoint should be something like TABGTS or something
KFLF as  lot of people say is not used any more or people dont use it .I have found KFLF in older motronics too but
ther was no LAMFA
Logged

VAG cars newbie tuner Smiley
Tb205gti
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 52


« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2013, 11:55:31 AM »

Okay, so the KFLDRL is some sort of "linearisation" of the Wastegate/Turbo? Interesting Smiley

Now I have been comparing my ori to an "OPC" ori from an Opel Corsa. The OPC corsa produces 192BHp whereas mine produces 180Bhp.

Now looking at LDRXN I would expect the higher powered ori to have the highest values - but it's the opposite way 'round.. Max load on the OPC is ~144 and on mine it's ~155.

I know that the OPC runs higher boost, so why is max allowed load lower on it?

in KFLDIMX I can see why the OPC makes boost slightly sooner, and makes more boost at higher revs. That maps is as I'd expect, with higher DC low down and top end. (in the middle area, it's slightly lower approx. by 3%.

But why is LDRXN lower?
Logged
mcgas001
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +2/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 47


« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2013, 12:00:13 PM »

I'm quite surprised at this having LDRXN, as the ME1.5.5 in the Astra from 2002-2004 has LDRXN like ME7. Then on the VXR's Corsa and Astra (ME7.6.2) they used KFRLSNT. Now the insignia seems to have gone back to having LDRXN.

Either way making a nice little Stage 1/2 should't be no issue with this ECU provided you got a fair amount of S4 wiki maps listed on it.
Logged
TCSTigersClaw
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +15/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 353



« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2013, 12:06:21 PM »

Maybe you didnt find LDRXN but LDRXNZK on the OPC map or something .They are back to back and they have similar values.
LDRXZK is always lower.

I dont know about opels but VAGs have different LDRXN indeed.
the QN- RP (150-180hp) differnces in LDRXN are

150 hp: 95   102   126   132   131   129   127   118   128   123   124   117   110   106   103   97

180hp:  90   108   122   131   135   133   132   131   127   125   126   128   134   124   119   114

with the same KFMIRL KFLDRL KFLDIMX
Logged

VAG cars newbie tuner Smiley
IamwhoIam
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +48/-105
Offline Offline

Posts: 1054


« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2013, 04:30:41 PM »

These ECUs usually have KFMDMXNT and RLSMDN....
Logged

I have no logs because I have a boost gauge (makes things easier)
Tb205gti
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 52


« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2013, 11:17:43 PM »

Maybe you didnt find LDRXN but LDRXNZK on the OPC map or something .They are back to back and they have similar values.
LDRXZK is always lower.

This is (what I believe) is the LDXRN on both:




They are at the same place (albeit different ddresses, due to the different layout).

Now if the OPC has a better flowing turbo (bigger), the filling will be better, and thus the load will be lower? Can that explain why it is lower on the OPC?
« Last Edit: November 08, 2013, 01:47:22 PM by Tb205gti » Logged
Tb205gti
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 52


« Reply #12 on: November 04, 2013, 11:20:15 PM »

These ECUs usually have KFMDMXNT and RLSMDN....

None of those are defined in the 7.6.2 damos I'm comparing with. :/
Logged
IamwhoIam
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +48/-105
Offline Offline

Posts: 1054


« Reply #13 on: November 05, 2013, 02:02:01 AM »

Also your file isn't even stock to begin with.
Logged

I have no logs because I have a boost gauge (makes things easier)
Tb205gti
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 52


« Reply #14 on: November 05, 2013, 02:14:22 AM »

Also your file isn't even stock to begin with.

hmm.. The insignia file is not an ori?? It should be an ori, not a modified one. :/

Do you have the ori that goes with it?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.027 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)