LDRXN_0_A vs LDRXN_1

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

Author

Topic: LDRXN_0_A vs LDRXN_1_A? (Read 4039 times)

stuklr

Full Member

Karma: +2/-0
Offline

Offline

Posts: 147

	LDRXN_0_A vs LDRXN_1_A? « on: January 21, 2014, 11:56:11 AM »

I am dailing in an ME7.1.1 tune BEL 2.7t 551R box.

I notice thet this layout has both LDRXN_0_A and LDRXN_1_A listed. I have been setting both to the same values and had good results.

Is the _1_A overboost? Can that be setup differently? When would it be active? Or am i way off and its just how my def is organized.


	Logged

ddillenger

Hero Member

Karma: +641/-21
Offline

Offline

Posts: 5640

	Re: LDRXN_0_A vs LDRXN_1_A? « Reply #1 on: January 21, 2014, 12:11:07 PM »

VARDEF.

One is for variant coding, IE A6 vs Allroad, or Auto vs Manual. The 551R has many different coding variations.


	Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM

stuklr

Full Member

Karma: +2/-0
Offline

Offline

Posts: 147

	Re: LDRXN_0_A vs LDRXN_1_A? « Reply #2 on: January 21, 2014, 12:42:40 PM »

Ah, makes sense then. Thats how they get away with using the same .bin for both trans. Thanks


	Logged

slappynuts

Jr. Member

Karma: +0/-0
Offline

Offline

Posts: 49

	Re: LDRXN_0_A vs LDRXN_1_A? « Reply #3 on: July 07, 2015, 01:57:02 PM »

Ah I see, that explains a lot Cheesy


	Logged

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

Jump to:

Navigation

Personal Tools

November 28, 2024, 10:52:15 PM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Navigation

Personal Tools

Search