|
ddillenger
|
 |
« Reply #240 on: May 27, 2013, 10:07:34 PM »
|
|
|
Same location for the L-box (8D0907551L 02612047004) as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
Axis
Full Member
Karma: +4/-4
 Offline
Posts: 91
|
|
« Reply #241 on: June 01, 2013, 09:08:52 AM »
|
|
|
Ok, so everyone having problems with b1s1 malfunction, make sure your warm-up fueling is dialed in. Both masterj and I had the DTC go away after tweaking KFFWL maps. I had to set FKHABMN to zero in my file as well to correct warm up. But the DTC is now gone. Readiness is still not ready though.
I'ld like to know why we should have to tweak KFFWL. I've ran without rear o2 for years with rear o2 faultcodes and have never seen b1s1 malfunction. But now after coding out rear o2 I get the B1S1 malfunction. I've triple checked everything. I can run readiness test and get full readiness set. Is there anything in FR (or Alfa FR) that indicate why a tweak of KFFWL would help? And why would the B1S1 problem show only after I did fix for cat and rear o2? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prj
|
|
« Reply #242 on: June 01, 2013, 11:16:43 AM »
|
|
|
You don't have to touch it. It "helps" because it prevents certain diagnosis conditions from having an effect.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Axis
Full Member
Karma: +4/-4
Offline
Posts: 91
|
|
« Reply #243 on: June 01, 2013, 12:44:42 PM »
|
|
|
You don't have to touch it. It "helps" because it prevents certain diagnosis conditions from having an effect.
Ok, i do not want to hide a problem. But what you're saying is that phila_dots summary on post127 in this thread thrashes the b1s1 signal diagnostic on a wideband ecu? Those are the things i've done.(with a couple of obvious mods due to wb) without phila_dots suggested things i do not get b1s1 dtc. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #244 on: June 01, 2013, 01:22:17 PM »
|
|
|
I'ld like to know why we should have to tweak KFFWL.
I've ran without rear o2 for years with rear o2 faultcodes and have never seen b1s1 malfunction.
But now after coding out rear o2 I get the B1S1 malfunction.
I've triple checked everything. I can run readiness test and get full readiness set.
Is there anything in FR (or Alfa FR) that indicate why a tweak of KFFWL would help? And why would the B1S1 problem show only after I did fix for cat and rear o2?
What's the P code? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #245 on: June 01, 2013, 01:54:02 PM »
|
|
|
What's the P code?
I think it is p0130. Btw i got same dtc. Until this code isnt set readliness gor oxygen sensor isnt passed too. Once dtc is stored readliness becomes passed. Strange |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Axis
Full Member
Karma: +4/-4
Offline
Posts: 91
|
|
« Reply #246 on: June 01, 2013, 02:14:08 PM »
|
|
|
What's the P code?
P0134 - 35-00 - No Activity |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #247 on: June 01, 2013, 04:01:14 PM »
|
|
|
I can tell you that you're both having problems in DLSU.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #248 on: June 02, 2013, 11:47:00 PM »
|
|
|
Can you specify subfuction of dlsu that checks conditions for my dtc? And how can readliness be passed with front o2 dtc?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
catbed
|
|
« Reply #249 on: June 03, 2013, 10:54:55 AM »
|
|
|
I'ld like to know why we should have to tweak KFFWL.
I've ran without rear o2 for years with rear o2 faultcodes and have never seen b1s1 malfunction.
But now after coding out rear o2 I get the B1S1 malfunction.
I've triple checked everything. I can run readiness test and get full readiness set.
Is there anything in FR (or Alfa FR) that indicate why a tweak of KFFWL would help? And why would the B1S1 problem show only after I did fix for cat and rear o2?
Dunno. Masterj told me about it, and it "fixed" my DTC too. I'd be interested in a proper fix too. FWIW, the code I have is p0130 as well. I'll take a look in DLSU when I get some time |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
s5fourdoor
|
|
« Reply #250 on: June 03, 2013, 04:37:55 PM »
|
|
|
Everything in the S4 wiki DTC section below:
"To fix up the EGT model:
ATM:
ZATMIKML = 1
ZATMIKKML = 1
TABGMEX = F(max)
..."
needs intense cleanup. Should we start a new thread for this?
I can't find some of the addresses, tables, conversion values & other stuff.
My XDF has alot of stuff in it and I'd like to upload it, but we should work on fixing this stuff first.
Who can help to properly clean this up with me?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #251 on: June 03, 2013, 04:40:10 PM »
|
|
|
Every time I look at the wiki I get anxious. Just thinking about cleaning it up gives me nightmares.
However, I agree. The EGT model info is in the wrong section, and terribly convoluted.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #252 on: June 03, 2013, 04:42:59 PM »
|
|
|
Every time I look at the wiki I get anxious. Just thinking about cleaning it up gives me nightmares.
However, I agree. The EGT model info is in the wrong section, and terribly convoluted.
yes and yes... i could use a big assist here |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
|
s5fourdoor
|
|
« Reply #253 on: June 03, 2013, 05:02:36 PM »
|
|
|
masterj got the closest to fixing this, but i don't think we have mandate-like clarity on what exactly needs to be changed. for instance he uses a few variables which i can't find & then he refers to variables which are vectors - by variables which appear to be scalars. idk, i'm a programmer, so perhaps i'm a bit retentive - but i think we really need to fix this up. the rear o2 stuff is close. i think the big issue we have here is that there are so many different flavors of what has been removed and thus what needs to be changed based on that...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Axis
Full Member
Karma: +4/-4
Offline
Posts: 91
|
|
« Reply #254 on: June 04, 2013, 08:05:44 AM »
|
|
|
Edit:
I'll update later about my p0134 dtc. I thought i had found something in cdlash but i was wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
