i made an observation today on a 550mi road trip related to this Torque Monitoring2 - Control Limit Exceeded code. 

i began the drive on my aggressive file with Torque Monitoring disabled and i have to say, i enjoyed the car much more this way.  the throttle is sharp and i was able to pass with ~25% throttle in 6th without issue (with TM enabled this would sporadically cause the TM2-control limit exceeded code).
this file is pretty well sorted by now and everything from idle to WOT to throttle lift off is pretty smooth BUT - i know i need some MAF correction for some low load areas where MAF is reading too low.

i hit some traffic and had to slow down for some miles where i was cruising at very light load (10-25).  when i resumed normal speed (and load) i could tell i was running way rich and the throttle was a little crazy.  i pulled off and hooked up my netbook to check LTFTs which were +11% (!!!).  they are normally -2% or so.  i left the netbook hooked up and left 032, 033 and a group that shows load (dont recall #) and commenced normal 80mph cruise.  load was 35-60 depending on incline and STFTs showed major trimming.  STFTs stayed negative for quite a while and i watched LTFTs drop until they settled around -1%.  LTFTs stayed here for over an hour while load was >35.

this gave me the idea to load up my file with TM enabled so i pulled off and flashed it.  when i kept load around 40+ my fuel trims were close to zero and i had no problems with TM related throttle-cut.  if i slowed for a period and used light load this caused my trims to go way positive.  if i then suddenly increased load (to pass in 6th gear with 25-40% throttle) - bam - throttle-cut + EPC light with the TM code.

so - in my case - it seems that venturing into territory where MAF readings are accurate after lingering in a load area where they are low (which causes trims to go way positive) means too much fuel in the normal area and is related to exceeding Torque Control Limits.

so - does this make sense? does anyone have any insight?

i'm going to hook up the wideband and do MAF correction this weekend.

i don't think trims are involved in the calcs but i do suspect that if trims are +11% when i dip into the throttle and increase load then actual lambda goes way lower than requested and this may influence the torque calculation.  maybe?

Oh, also, have you tried logging the appropriate torque values? i don't know them offhand.

i noticed this as well - though i struggled with the translation of the last part of the application note.  here is my translation --

A total deactivation of the function by the map KFMIZUOF can be carried out (KFMIZUOF = 99,6% for all data points). A deactivation of the afterstart extension can be achieved by data input into the maps KFDMINS and KLDMKH. In this case the map KFDMINS is filled with 0. The temperature thresholds TMNSMN and TANSMN are set to -48C. Deactivation of the function %mdzul (Maximum allowable torque) while Torque Monitoring is active can result in a Level 2 Torque Monitoring response (%ufmzul) with the error response SKA (Safety fuel cut-off condition)

i don't completely understand the last part and my german is not very good. it seems to state that if mdzul (which calculates maximum allowable torque) is disabled and Torque Monitoring is active - then a TM2 error may occur.  this makes no sense to me.

also - does the 2.7t have the maps KFDMINS and KLDMKH?

I haven't checked the FR, but I dont' see any way it can know what the actual lambda is... it can only know req AFR....

berTTos, did you also increase KFZWOP?

I cannot find any benefit to increasing it.  What are you guys seeing that I'm not?

e85 

going through this right now,
http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php/topic,881.0.html
but yes i've gone over kfzop values, though i'm  not requesting 42*, seems that kfzwop is supplying those timing values while kfzw is saying 36.