|
|
|
nyet
|
 |
« Reply #286 on: April 02, 2012, 08:59:35 AM »
|
|
|
Also looking @ the logs... I seem to be flat lining the MAF, that means it's pretty much @ the end no? BTW this is max 24-25psi... guess it's time to upgrade!
The 8 bit maximum is 364 ish, the 16 bit maximum is 499 (iirc) Which are you logging (like nmot_w, dont log the wrong one  ) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
Karma: +58/-7
 Offline
Posts: 1056
|
|
« Reply #287 on: April 02, 2012, 09:35:54 AM »
|
|
|
The 8 bit maximum is 364 ish, the 16 bit maximum is 499 (iirc) Which are you logging (like nmot_w, dont log the wrong one ) I am logging the right one (this time lol)... but JFC, I can believe there are that many combinations lol. That said, I am maxing my MAF @ 5600 RPM my values (from ECUx) is 376 (x 3.6 = 1353.6), the last bin in MLHFM is: 1354.1... so I'm maxing the sensor in this housing (at the same time that happens my AFR's go whacky/rich). What I am really curious about is my load and the flat line/notch around 4k RPM... I don't see why the load is being limited like that... any ideas?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jibberjive
|
|
« Reply #289 on: April 02, 2012, 10:00:46 PM »
|
|
|
Any insight on how to modify those maps to smooth out the notch for a slightly laggier setup (my boost profile follows NVR's pretty closely)? I've played around with those maps a little, and nothing I did alleviated the notch. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #290 on: April 02, 2012, 10:05:02 PM »
|
|
|
IIRC those do *not* affect actual load, only spec boost.
If you have a discontinuity in your actual load readings, i'd start with smoothing the various HFM maps.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
|
jibberjive
|
|
« Reply #291 on: April 02, 2012, 10:07:20 PM »
|
|
|
IIRC those do *not* affect actual load, only spec boost.
If you have a discontinuity in your actual load readings, i'd start with smoothing the various HFM maps.
I'll take some logs tonight and post in my build log here. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #292 on: April 02, 2012, 11:55:25 PM »
|
|
|
IIRC those do *not* affect actual load, only spec boost.
Those maps are directly used in the calculation of actual load rl_w. Any insight on how to modify those maps to smooth out the notch for a slightly laggier setup (my boost profile follows NVR's pretty closely)? I've played around with those maps a little, and nothing I did alleviated the notch.
Unfortunately, none of the relevant variables are provided by ME7Info. I was falsely under the impression that B_nwvs was switched during cam changeover, but in fact it is set by SY_NWS > 0. This would not cause a hard switch. Try logging fnwue and see if it is related to the "notch". If so, KFPBRKNW may be the issue. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
Karma: +58/-7
Offline
Posts: 1056
|
|
« Reply #293 on: April 03, 2012, 06:53:30 AM »
|
|
|
IIRC those do *not* affect actual load, only spec boost
yes, you will notice on the last page my boost profile looked like this:  and setting the cam profiles to all 1.00 gave me the smooth notch then like you see in the more recent logs above. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
s5fourdoor
|
|
« Reply #294 on: April 03, 2012, 08:09:09 AM »
|
|
|
have a feeling it's time for your pro-m setup....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #295 on: April 03, 2012, 08:34:21 AM »
|
|
|
yes, you will notice on the last page my boost profile looked like this: and setting the cam profiles to all 1.00 gave me the smooth notch then like you see in the more recent logs above. Can you post rl_w, rlmx_w, rlmax_w, and rlsol_w all from the same run? Set which map to all 1.00? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
Karma: +58/-7
Offline
Posts: 1056
|
|
« Reply #296 on: April 03, 2012, 08:34:47 AM »
|
|
|
have a feeling it's time for your pro-m setup....
most defiantly, waiting on a quote from a buddy as we speak  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #297 on: April 03, 2012, 08:47:20 AM »
|
|
|
Those maps are directly used in the calculation of actual load rl_w.
Yes, you're right, I was wrong Apologies. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
|
|
|
jibberjive
|
|
« Reply #299 on: April 04, 2012, 09:56:54 PM »
|
|
|
Playing with the torque management and stuff, what have you found that is helping spool the soonest?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
