Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: upgrading turbos, keeping same stage 3 tune? (ko4 -> rs6/k24)  (Read 17574 times)
phila_dot
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +173/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709


« Reply #15 on: August 25, 2014, 04:15:09 AM »

Since the K24/26 hybrid turbos are larger machines, running on K-04 boost maps, should result in about the same boost pressure as the K-04s with slower spool up response time, not excessive boost. The boost controller is a 3 mode PID controller, (Proportional/Integral/Derivative) with actual boost pressure feedback for comparison to the requested boost, for offset/rate/reset response to drive the N75 control pressure output value accordingly. the N75 control voltage PWM duty cycle is adjusted by the PID controller output to achieve the necessary boost pressure and associated torque development.  Therefore I don't believe there is any risk of excessive boost pressure or out of control boost regulation. With torque demand base engine management two main factors are used as inputs for boost pressure control, the MAF meter output is used for engine load determination, and the MAP sensor output is used for boost pressure measurement. Boost pressure is one of the main torque control variables used by the ECU to match torque achievement with the sum of the torque demands at any instant. If the ECU uses drive by wire throttle, the engine management is based on torque demand. Mechanical  throttle control uses a different boost control model in the ECU software, but is also a PID controller  configured in software. In the specific boost pressure control  for mechanical throttle control, the larger turbos running with  K-04 tune, would most likely not boost as much as the K-04s due to the larger turbine and reduced spool up response. Given enough time, the larger turbos should develop about the same boost as the K-04s. I don't know of any way the larger K-24 based turbos could accelerate out of control, developing excess boost pressure when controlled by the K-04 tune, with everything operating normally.

Like Daz said, the outcome will either be limp, unstable boost, or extreme overboost depending on the tune.

The torque model outputs desired torque, this is converted to desired load, and then target boost pressure. Boost pressure is tightly regulated while the previous two are not.

If DLDR was tuned tightly for the K04, then the car may go into limp due to underboost (slower spool). Otherwise depending on target boost pressure it will oscillate or overboost.

While building boost pressure, P will shoot high and easily exceed TVLDMX keeping N75 dc above 95%. During this time, I is winding up and will definitely reach ldtvmx, which for a K04 is going to be much higher than needed for the K24. Once, target boost pressure is approached, D will not be great enough to pull DC down enough to avoid overshoot because I is way too high. If boost control is closed loop at this time and target boost pressure is low enough, boost will oscillate wildy from the overshoot and different wastegate response. If the ECU is closed loop, the car will boost beyond 30 psi due to dc being locked above 85%.


Logged
diagnosticator
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +2/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 42


« Reply #16 on: September 11, 2014, 10:51:19 PM »

Like Daz said, the outcome will either be limp, unstable boost, or extreme overboost depending on the tune.

The torque model outputs desired torque, this is converted to desired load, and then target boost pressure. Boost pressure is tightly regulated while the previous two are not.

If DLDR was tuned tightly for the K04, then the car may go into limp due to underboost (slower spool). Otherwise depending on target boost pressure it will oscillate or overboost.

While building boost pressure, P will shoot high and easily exceed TVLDMX keeping N75 dc above 95%. During this time, I is winding up and will definitely reach ldtvmx, which for a K04 is going to be much higher than needed for the K24. Once, target boost pressure is approached, D will not be great enough to pull DC down enough to avoid overshoot because I is way too high. If boost control is closed loop at this time and target boost pressure is low enough, boost will oscillate wildy from the overshoot and different wastegate response. If the ECU is closed loop, the car will boost beyond 30 psi due to dc being locked above 85%.



Please explain how you associate the larger K-24 turbocharger response dynamics to the K-04 specific PID boost controller parameters you speculatively described above. It is not at all clear that the interaction will necessarily have the undesirable effects alleged. Specifically, the described dynamics of the controlled system imply the various torque demand/load/boost control functions are unable to control the boost pressure within allowable stable range levels, but the several codependent variables occurring need additional detailed explanation. I am not trying to be argumentative here, but these are important factors involved and the concepts are usually not fully developed on this forum, for clarity and complete understanding of the overall situation involved with this.
I don't have enough information from your comments to be able to determine the validity of the speculated response of the turbo/PID controller interaction.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #17 on: September 11, 2014, 11:01:31 PM »

Please explain how you associate the larger K-24 turbocharger response dynamics to the K-04 specific PID boost controller parameters you speculatively described above. It is not at all clear that the interaction will necessarily have the undesirable effects alleged. Specifically, the described dynamics of the controlled system imply the various torque demand/load/boost control functions are unable to control the boost pressure within allowable stable range levels, but the several codependent variables occurring need additional detailed explanation. I am not trying to be argumentative here, but these are important factors involved and the concepts are usually not fully developed on this forum, for clarity and complete understanding of the overall situation involved with this.
I don't have enough information from your comments to be able to determine the validity of the speculated response of the turbo/PID controller interaction.

A lot of long words. I'll make it short.

Between a different wg and the completely different compressor housing, for a given N75 duty cycle, the response will be entirely different.

That is to say... the PID will have to be retuned. Minimally, the I-limit will definitely have to be different.

Not sure why you are accusing anybody of speculating; this should be pretty obvious if you've tuned the PID in *any* ME7 car.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2014, 11:03:10 PM by nyet » Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.016 seconds with 16 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)