Divune
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
 Offline
Posts: 43
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: September 10, 2014, 11:51:02 AM »
|
|
|
If you edited the data in the LAMFA axis parameter in the xdf I created, that edited the bin.
This is what I did, from tunerpro, opened the "LAMFA axis" table, corrected the load values on top to the proper 50/60/ etc... Sorry if I'm not understanding this, but is that all that needs to be done? This should change the bins contents , correct? I still have 0% trims, but I need to verify mrfa_w and log LAMFA |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #16 on: September 10, 2014, 11:53:09 AM »
|
|
|
This is what I did, from tunerpro, opened the "LAMFA axis" table, corrected the load values on top to the proper 50/60/ etc... Sorry if I'm not understanding this, but is that all that needs to be done? This should change the bins contents , correct? I still have 0% trims, but I need to verify mrfa_w and log LAMFA
Yes, and yes, logs would be helpful! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
Divune
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 43
|
|
« Reply #17 on: September 14, 2014, 08:59:47 PM »
|
|
|
Alright guys, I got some good logs of the car while it was running ok, but they might be irrelevant now. The car was starting just fine in the cold, hot or whatever, does not want to fire now very weird, as it was running PERFECT the night before and the entire week, restarted multiple times. Threw in my old GIAC ecu and it started just fine..... But i think I'm again on the wrong path, I checked my partial trims and they were at 18% with a KRKTE of nearly 0.750. For some proof of concept i turned it even farther up to .0800, and the car as it sits now ( not starting), is at partial trims of 11%. Something is amiss here, I scaled my MAF properly from what I know. Stock maf is 77mm and i run an 85mm, so the % increase was 1.218%, i multiplied all stock maf values by that. There must be something wrong thats causing me to have such high KRKTEs. I'm going to try and empty out this e85 and start tuning again on 91... Appreciate everyones help so far.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Divune
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 43
|
|
« Reply #18 on: September 14, 2014, 09:27:20 PM »
|
|
|
hm, well hopefully this will help. I wanted to see if the tune was causing the no start, so i flashed SIX different tunes i have, stock M and my 91 and e85 tunes that I know are working and it would not start with any of them. Nefmoto flasher still connects fine, so does VCDS. So i again tossed in my giac ecu and it starts right away. Hopefully this can help us point to something causing the no starts. Checksums have and always are being corrected and checked also.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #19 on: September 14, 2014, 10:43:20 PM »
|
|
|
The difference between 77mm and 85mm is certainly not 1.2 percent. Additionally, the stock MAF is 73mm ID, not 77 assuming you have an S4.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #20 on: September 14, 2014, 10:45:47 PM »
|
|
|
The difference between 77mm and 85mm is certainly not 1.2 percent. Additionally, the stock MAF is 73mm ID, not 77 assuming you have an S4.
I'm guessing he meant 21.8% (1.218)? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #21 on: September 14, 2014, 10:54:46 PM »
|
|
|
I'm guessing he meant 21.8% (1.218)?
That would make more sense, but still be off as we know stock is not 77. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
Divune
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 43
|
|
« Reply #22 on: September 15, 2014, 12:12:18 AM »
|
|
|
I thought stock was 77mm from what I found, didn't that section of the wiki with MAF. If 73mm is stock, then correct me if I'm wrong, 73-85 is 16.44% larger, I will multiply it all by 1.1644 yea? Thanks guys, also, any idea on the no-start deal with this ?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 15, 2014, 12:15:05 AM by killerkali »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #23 on: September 15, 2014, 12:40:05 AM »
|
|
|
I thought stock was 77mm from what I found, didn't that section of the wiki with MAF. If 73mm is stock, then correct me if I'm wrong, 73-85 is 16.44% larger, I will multiply it all by 1.1644 yea? Thanks guys, also, any idea on the no-start deal with this ?
73mm has an area of 4185.39 mm2 85mm has an area of 5674.5 mm2 Difference is around 30 percent, certainly not 16 percent. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
Divune
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 43
|
|
« Reply #24 on: September 15, 2014, 12:45:28 AM »
|
|
|
someone should slap me.. increase of the area not ID. Thanks for that. I'll make those changes to my tune, need to figure out the start issue first to test it Ahh!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Divune
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 43
|
|
« Reply #25 on: September 22, 2014, 10:34:29 PM »
|
|
|
So the cars back on 91 pisstane until I finish tuning it. I have attached a .csv of a few 3rd gear pulls last night. Some things that are off, my Krkte is at .06100 , still adjusting but the partials are at ~ +4% right now. I am running the EV14 298s, at 4 bar on my b5 2.7t & walbro 450 relayed. I have tweaked the AFRs using the "KR" method, it dips quite rich to 10.7 but otherwise is good. Thanks again for all of your input.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Divune
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 43
|
|
« Reply #26 on: September 22, 2014, 10:46:42 PM »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 22, 2014, 10:54:35 PM by killerkali »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Divune
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 43
|
|
« Reply #27 on: September 25, 2014, 01:00:28 PM »
|
|
|
bumppp, any input ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Divune
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 43
|
|
« Reply #28 on: October 25, 2014, 06:01:46 PM »
|
|
|
Can someone walk me through adjusting the KFMIOP axis? Mine is still factory at 191, and I believe this is limiting me to 14psi regardless of Ldr and KFMIRL. I've read a ton of threads, used WINols but I cannot seem to find where it is located. My map is attached if that helps. Also, is there such thing as a nefmoto stage 2 xdf, Ive seen it mentioned. Thanks guys. !
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #29 on: October 25, 2014, 08:01:27 PM »
|
|
|
It isn't, I promise.
Post rlmx_w, rlmax_w, and rlsol_w
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
