Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: E85 EGT's  (Read 11968 times)
MIL_on
Full Member
***

Karma: +12/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 119


« Reply #15 on: October 07, 2014, 03:51:51 AM »

Think about the laminar and turbolent flame velocity for E85 at lambda 0.85.

Then you know why people calibrate E85 richer and why the EGTs are cooler.

i have tons of cylinder-pressure data etc. for any variations of Lambda / Ignition angle on the dyno and these def. show that there is no benefit in decreasing EGTs as far as 700° or going rich as hell.
Logged
Lost
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +21/-14
Offline Offline

Posts: 556


« Reply #16 on: October 07, 2014, 04:08:03 AM »

i have tons of cylinder-pressure data etc. for any variations of Lambda / Ignition angle on the dyno and these def. show that there is no benefit in decreasing EGTs as far as 700° or going rich as hell.

Would you share your data, or could you share some conclusions of your logs??
Logged
daniel2345
Full Member
***

Karma: +11/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 197


« Reply #17 on: October 07, 2014, 07:49:00 AM »

Me too.

I see very high peak pressure for lambda 0.85.

It always depends on the engine. You will have high peak pressure with suitable ignition angle and lambda 0.85.

Some engines can take it, some not.

You will have lower peak pressures on lower lambda with same engine and ignition degree, but nearly same average pressure per combustion cycle (= torque).


So everyone is free to choose. i choose lower lambdas, lower temperature and having engine happy long time.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.013 seconds with 16 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)