Pages: [1]
Author Topic: ZKLAMFAW in 018CM? - 2002 Passat  (Read 4118 times)
SB_GLI
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +116/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 1022


« on: November 05, 2014, 09:33:18 AM »

I'm having lamfa issues... filtering just like we had in the a4 1.8t community project.  I can't seem to locate zklamfaw, or whatever it is in this ecu.  It's not before lamfa like in the a4 file.

See the attached screen shot.  Notice that the linear decline of AFR Desired.  I want this to reach my target AFR quickly, vs the slow linear decline that it's doing now.

Any help?
Logged
Jerry Tunin
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 121



WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2015, 07:13:09 AM »

I'm having lamfa issues... filtering just like we had in the a4 1.8t community project.  I can't seem to locate zklamfaw, or whatever it is in this ecu.  It's not before lamfa like in the a4 file.

See the attached screen shot.  Notice that the linear decline of AFR Desired.  I want this to reach my target AFR quickly, vs the slow linear decline that it's doing now.

Any help?

Where you able to figure this out?
Logged

MadCow
Full Member
***

Karma: +3/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 108


« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2015, 01:39:29 PM »

I asked the same question in the CH box definition thread, no response so far. From what I know ZKLAMFAW is a variable rather than a map like in the B6, so it'll probably need disassembly to find it.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2015, 04:00:02 PM by MadCow » Logged
SB_GLI
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +116/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 1022


« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2015, 08:55:16 AM »

I asked the same question in the CH box definition thread, no response so far. From what I know ZKLAMFAW is a variable rather than a map like in the B6, so it'll probably need disassembly to find it.

I ended up just switching to the CH file, where this was not an issue.  Since then, I'm using BTS fueling anyway.  Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.015 seconds with 16 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)