General consensus on these logs

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

Author

Topic: General consensus on these logs (Read 3879 times)

robsa6

Jr. Member

Karma: +0/-0
Offline

Offline

Posts: 29

	General consensus on these logs « on: April 25, 2015, 05:53:27 PM »

Ok so as the title states I'm looking for ideas and constructive criticism regarding these logs. I've been collecting info like a madman for months and slowly bringing my a6 to the point of these logs. The car is ko4's, EV14 550cc, new 710n's, catless dps w/full 2.5 magnaflow exhaust, lwfw, Stock MAF, 6MT... Thanks in advance and bring on the discussion.


« Last Edit: April 25, 2015, 06:14:30 PM by robsa6 »	Logged

nyet

Administrator
Hero Member

Karma: +608/-168
Offline

Offline

Posts: 12270

	Re: General consensus on these logs « Reply #1 on: April 25, 2015, 06:00:15 PM »

Please post the log itself


	Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex

vwaudiguy

Hero Member

Karma: +53/-37
Offline

Offline

Posts: 2024

	Re: General consensus on these logs « Reply #2 on: April 25, 2015, 06:01:28 PM »

No expert here, but looking at the log(s) with load, it looks like you need to log rl_w instead of rl so it does not flatline @ 191. Variables with _w are 16 bit vs. 8 bit non _w.


	Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."

robsa6

Jr. Member

Karma: +0/-0
Offline

Offline

Posts: 29

	Re: General consensus on these logs « Reply #3 on: April 25, 2015, 06:27:07 PM »

Thanks for the tip. I was wondering what the differences were! I'll re log tomorrow and change that. So the FATS time huh? HA I don't know what happened but I don't think im anywhere near that fast! I am wondering what I might have done wrong with the hp and tq graphs. Car feels good (ie faster than 300 hp but slower than 2.25 FATS)


	Logged

nyet

Administrator
Hero Member

Karma: +608/-168
Offline

Offline

Posts: 12270

	Re: General consensus on these logs « Reply #4 on: April 25, 2015, 06:34:33 PM »

Quote from: robsa6 on April 25, 2015, 06:27:07 PM

So the FATS time huh?

Its only showing your 2nd gear pull because your 3rd gear pull didn't start at a low enough rpm.

Log looks good though, good job.


	Logged

robsa6

Jr. Member

Karma: +0/-0
Offline

Offline

Posts: 29

	Re: General consensus on these logs « Reply #5 on: April 25, 2015, 06:42:15 PM »

Thanks Nyet. This was all done traveling from long island to charlotte adjusting my fueling at rest areas... Brick my ECU? pffft. Honestly I was worried to death but it was killing me to watch my a/f meter run rich


	Logged

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

Jump to:

Navigation

Personal Tools

November 28, 2024, 03:33:22 PM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Navigation

Personal Tools

Search