KFTARX: how aggressive does it have to be?

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

Author

Topic: KFTARX: how aggressive does it have to be? (Read 9120 times)

nyet

Administrator
Hero Member

Karma: +604/-166
Offline

Offline

Posts: 12233

	KFTARX: how aggressive does it have to be? « on: August 01, 2011, 04:10:39 PM »

KFTARX tans axis is 20C per div... that is QUITE a bit... how much of a slope is required to keep req. boost constant over the range >40C?


	Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.

berTTos

Full Member

Karma: +24/-0
Offline

Offline

Posts: 91

	Re: KFTARX: how aggressive does it have to be? « Reply #1 on: August 02, 2011, 08:04:55 AM »

Quote from: nyet on August 01, 2011, 04:10:39 PM

KFTARX tans axis is 20C per div... that is QUITE a bit... how much of a slope is required to keep req. boost constant over the range >40C?

this is another table that i have set to all 1s. if i were to tune it i would alter the axis values for 20* and 60* to approx 8* and 48* which would allow more control within the IAT ranges we regularly see.


	Logged

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

Jump to:

Navigation

Personal Tools

April 23, 2024, 10:43:12 PM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Navigation

Personal Tools

Search