matchew
|
|
« Reply #15 on: October 02, 2011, 11:14:48 AM »
|
|
|
Ok, which address'/tables have you altered to try and combat this?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
s-company
Full Member
Karma: +3/-0
Offline
Posts: 104
|
|
« Reply #16 on: October 02, 2011, 11:45:18 AM »
|
|
|
As i said before, i tried all nmax maps i have found, not just one.
165B8 165C7 165D8 165DA 1ECC6 1ECE8 165BE
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DigiFather
Newbie
Karma: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 11
|
|
« Reply #17 on: October 02, 2011, 01:43:04 PM »
|
|
|
your ecu dont see oil temp sensor so you must change rpm limiter vs oil temp.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
matchew
|
|
« Reply #18 on: October 02, 2011, 01:53:01 PM »
|
|
|
As i said before, i tried all nmax maps i have found, not just one.
165B8 165C7 165D8 165DA 1ECC6 1ECE8 165BE
There is no Nmax limiter at 0x165C7 Try putting 0x165D2 to 0x60 and 0x165D3 to 0x6D.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
s-company
Full Member
Karma: +3/-0
Offline
Posts: 104
|
|
« Reply #19 on: October 02, 2011, 02:05:12 PM »
|
|
|
at 165c7 is this 6x1 map:NMAXTO
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
matchew
|
|
« Reply #20 on: October 02, 2011, 02:13:51 PM »
|
|
|
at 165c7 is this 6x1 map:NMAXTO
No it isnt, no 16 bit data can start on an ODD address!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
s-company
Full Member
Karma: +3/-0
Offline
Posts: 104
|
|
« Reply #21 on: October 02, 2011, 02:22:02 PM »
|
|
|
sorry, 165c8
|
|
« Last Edit: October 02, 2011, 02:42:07 PM by s-company »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
matchew
|
|
« Reply #22 on: October 02, 2011, 02:23:30 PM »
|
|
|
sorry, 165c6
LOL - ok then! Let us know how you fix this when you work it out!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
s-company
Full Member
Karma: +3/-0
Offline
Posts: 104
|
|
« Reply #23 on: October 20, 2011, 12:48:51 AM »
|
|
|
thanks at all, problem is solved. 165C8 map is the one.
br
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
matchew
|
|
« Reply #24 on: October 20, 2011, 03:44:05 AM »
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Michel94
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 31
|
|
« Reply #25 on: September 15, 2012, 11:13:15 AM »
|
|
|
hi, i find this map limit, how must i tune it now? like this? thx
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Michel94
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 31
|
|
« Reply #26 on: September 16, 2012, 12:22:01 PM »
|
|
|
Nobody?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
prj
|
|
« Reply #27 on: September 17, 2012, 01:44:01 AM »
|
|
|
Yea, that's ok if your map is defined properly. The first two numbers look really weird, probably because the map has 4 values not 6.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Michel94
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 31
|
|
« Reply #28 on: September 17, 2012, 02:07:57 AM »
|
|
|
Yea, that's ok if your map is defined properly. The first two numbers look really weird, probably because the map has 4 values not 6.
No, i have find yesterday i think that my 551F file definition has a mistake on this map, now i adjust and find it: I will test on the car next week.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
s-company
Full Member
Karma: +3/-0
Offline
Posts: 104
|
|
« Reply #29 on: September 17, 2012, 06:17:32 AM »
|
|
|
this map is at address 165c8. and your mods are correct!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|