Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 ... 25
Author Topic: NOTORIOUS VR's M-box Stage 2++ and ALL VARIATIONS. NO NEW THREADS ON THIS.  (Read 264197 times)
BraxS4
Full Member
***

Karma: +2/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 162



« Reply #255 on: January 27, 2014, 09:07:59 AM »

And earlier my -7 comment was for logging CF not timing. 
Logged

stage 3 b5 S4
carroll1992
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 30


« Reply #256 on: January 27, 2014, 10:56:56 AM »

Got NVR's map on and WOW what a difference! Does it have launch control? (I know it started without at the start of the thread but unsure if this version has it. Wouldn't work for me don't know if its the switch on my clutch pedal or not? I've attached the map I used
« Last Edit: January 27, 2014, 11:00:58 AM by carroll1992 » Logged
BraxS4
Full Member
***

Karma: +2/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 162



« Reply #257 on: January 27, 2014, 11:35:24 AM »

Told ya.  It should be plenty strong. I'll
Check when I get home and if it does not have nls anti lag ill upload it.  I have it modded.
Logged

stage 3 b5 S4
carroll1992
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 30


« Reply #258 on: January 27, 2014, 01:10:17 PM »

Told ya.  It should be plenty strong. I'll
Check when I get home and if it does not have nls anti lag ill upload it.  I have it modded.
Thanks! If anyone could convert this to an Hitachi maf I'd be extremely grateful!
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #259 on: January 27, 2014, 01:37:43 PM »

Thanks! If anyone could convert this to an Hitachi maf I'd be extremely grateful!

Lots of available info on the DIY route.

MLOFS
KFKHFM
MLHFM

All need to be changed to convert Bosch--->Hitachi.

These are all copied from a file containing the MAF you want to use. This assumes your intake tract is stock. If it is not, consider setting KFKHFM to all 1's and adjusting from there.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2014, 02:06:12 PM by ddillenger » Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
carroll1992
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 30


« Reply #260 on: January 27, 2014, 01:57:20 PM »

MLOFS
KFKHFM
MLHFM

All need to be changed to convert Bosch--->Hitachi.
Thanks for your help, our of curiosity which maf is better (With a stage 3 tune in mind) bosch or Hitachi?
I understand MLOFS, I understand what the others do but have no idea how to even go about scaling KFKHFM or how MLHFM corresponds to the maf housing diameter. Is it just a case of copying these tables from my original map? Again thanks for your help!
« Last Edit: January 27, 2014, 02:00:08 PM by carroll1992 » Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #261 on: January 27, 2014, 02:07:49 PM »

Given the same diameter housings, the Bosch sensor is capable of reading a much higher flow. This allows you to run a smaller housing and keeping good resolution in low flow areas.

I always use Bosch whenever possible.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
carroll1992
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 30


« Reply #262 on: January 27, 2014, 04:19:04 PM »

Given the same diameter housings, the Bosch sensor is capable of reading a much higher flow. This allows you to run a smaller housing and keeping good resolution in low flow areas.

I always use Bosch whenever possible.
Thanks (Y) Is it just a case of swapping the tables from my standard map to the tuned map? (Sounds too easy to be true)
Logged
carroll1992
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 30


« Reply #263 on: January 27, 2014, 05:32:03 PM »

Given the same diameter housings, the Bosch sensor is capable of reading a much higher flow. This allows you to run a smaller housing and keeping good resolution in low flow areas.

I always use Bosch whenever possible.
Intake tract is stock, I've had a go at it, not done the checksums but I will attach what I've attempted. Think I understood your post correctly but please correct me if I'm wrong. If someone could point me in the right direction if its correct that wold be great!
So I started out with Adyspecs map (Bosch Maf) "551MSTG2.2.bin".
My standard map "audioriginalmap.bin"
I changed MLOFS from 200 > 0
I Copied my original tables KFKHFM and MLHFM from my original map to the new map "551MSTG2.hitachitest.bin". No idea if this is the correct way to do a maf conversion but if someone could point me in the right direction that would be great. Please note checksums haven't been done on my test file.
If anyone could help out that would be great, much appreciated!
I have attached all of the files used
« Last Edit: January 27, 2014, 05:41:36 PM by carroll1992 » Logged
BraxS4
Full Member
***

Karma: +2/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 162



« Reply #264 on: January 27, 2014, 07:55:55 PM »

good call ddillenger , thanks for the info

sounds like you did it correctly, just always use a checksum check tool after and you're clear to flash the file.. give it a flash and see if it runs, scan codes... "vagcom"
« Last Edit: January 27, 2014, 08:20:39 PM by BraxS4 » Logged

stage 3 b5 S4
carroll1992
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 30


« Reply #265 on: January 28, 2014, 04:33:39 PM »

good call ddillenger , thanks for the info

sounds like you did it correctly, just always use a checksum check tool after and you're clear to flash the file.. give it a flash and see if it runs, scan codes... "vagcom"
Just got round to finishing this off, I've made a couple of changes.
01/28/2014 23:06:23  Table:     KFKHFM changed.
01/28/2014 23:10:37  Scalar:    CW_CAN_R changed from  (0x00) to 32 - (0x20).
Used the KFKHFM values from NVM's map.
Thanks for all your help everyone!
Attempted to do checksums although my cmd just automatically closes the second the file is run, doesn't even give me a chance to see (closes in less than a second!) If anyone could do checksums/corrections for me I would greatly appreciate it, also any info or guidance on if I've done the maf correction would be great! Thanks in advance!
Logged
BraxS4
Full Member
***

Karma: +2/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 162



« Reply #266 on: January 28, 2014, 04:35:14 PM »

download the me7checkgui version
Logged

stage 3 b5 S4
carroll1992
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 30


« Reply #267 on: January 28, 2014, 04:39:54 PM »

download the me7checkgui version
Managed to grab a screenshot before it closed, just! And no didn't know there was one! Do you have a link for the download?
Logged
BraxS4
Full Member
***

Karma: +2/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 162



« Reply #268 on: January 28, 2014, 04:41:17 PM »

meep meep
Logged

stage 3 b5 S4
carroll1992
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 30


« Reply #269 on: January 28, 2014, 04:51:07 PM »

meep meep
Thanks much appreciated!

==============================================================================
me7check v1.12 (c) mki, 06/2004-05/2012
Checking file C:\Users\benca_000\Desktop\S4 Tuning\Own Map\551MSTG2.hitachitest.bin (size=1048576)
Reading Version Strings...
-> Bootrom Version = embedded in CPU, asume 05.12/05.32
-> EPK = 40/1/ME7.1/5/6005.01//22m/DstC2o/011200//
-> Contents of ECUID data table:
   - '0261207143'         (SSECUHN)         
   - '1037360857'         (SSECUSN)         
   - '8D0907551M  '       (VAG part number)
   - '0002'               (VAG sw number)   
   - '2.7l V6/5VT     '   (engine id)       
-> Contents of ECUID data table:
   - 'HW_MAN004'                           

Page checksum failure(s) found
Data area checksum failure(s) found
-> Found 4 errors!!!   *******************************

No idea where to go from here without cmd haha
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 ... 25
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.023 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)