kfldimx axis defined incorrectly, its started with 250hpa
you should not touching values at factory boost levels when you running stock wg
remove a few lower axis values (1 or 2), move factory map data according to this and add new boost levels with a new values.
like this

250 350 500 900 1100 ->  250 500 900 1100 1300


just slightly rise them. no rocket science when tweaking stock turbos

Thanks guys - Axis changed and then shifted along one so it now starts at 300 and ends at 1300 (1300 hPa being around 19psi right?)

I took some more logs this evening and something doesn't look right with miist_w - It can also be seen on my actual engine load, it stays flat for a good while and then there's a fairly big dip and I'm not sure whats causing it. I'm not getting any timing oscillations as i would expect to see if it was torque monitoring. I believe miist_w t be the output of KFMIOP corrected by lambda and ignition angle efficiency?

I have modified IOP axis to suit my new max specified load in LDRXN, I have also allowed more load via KFMIRL. Maybe this means i need to tweek my IOP? I've read a fair bit of conflicting info regarding IOP, some people seem to change the values in the table as well as the load axis, and I've seen some people say to the values in the table stock and just increase the load axis. I personally changed the last 3 load axis values and the values in the table for those load axis values to line up with the higher values in IRL. Kind of gone off topic but cant imagine it'll be helping if my torque model isn't right.

4th gear log attached

Should really reduce LDRXN higher up then since I'll never be able to reach those. I can see from the PID I adaptions they're rising so that means underboost - which is expected as my requested is literally unreachable for my hardware that high up in the rev range. Will reduce this so my wastegate DC isn't sat at 95% for ages lol.

Do you think miist_w looks right or is there probably something up. That big drop in my engine load just doesn't look nice 

Log ARMD

I see zero torque intervention or armd. Neither interfere with req boost, regardless. Anyway, that last log looks really good.

I wouldn't disable torque intervention, nor would I disable armd entirely.

Thanks Nyet - I will re activate TM soon, and i'll numb ARMD rather than removing totally. I just disabled it as a way to determine if that was or wasn't the problem.

I'm thinking i either have an issue with KFLDIMX or my calibration of IOP and IRL since I get a weird surging sometimes at part throttle.

Other than that I'm feeling happy so far, the dip in the boost is a bit annoying as i can feel it when at WOT, its not severe but it would be nice to have a smoother curve. Does KFLDIMX affect the requested boost at all?

Glad I have no CF's though, means there's more to come

I may try to re tune IOP and IRL by doing some linear interpolation in excel, just because from what i remember with my LDRXN I was quite close to miszul with the LDRXN I have, maybe that would sort the surging.

I'd really like to add some more variables to log, ones that didn't come up automatically though i have no idea how to add them - i know you have a list of extras on your github

Maybe one day  haha. I forgot to shift the map data when I changed the KFLDIMX axis. At the moment I get some part throttle boost surging around 3k rpm between 5-10psi on the gauge. Hoping when I shift the map data it'll sort itself out