ivan
Full Member
Karma: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 63
|
|
« Reply #15 on: March 15, 2017, 05:33:02 AM »
|
|
|
What xdf are you using? The one I'm using for HJ, doesn't seem to be showing correct values.
hi i´m using this mappack for winols, i got it from other forum:
|
|
« Last Edit: March 15, 2017, 09:26:10 AM by ivan »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ivan
Full Member
Karma: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 63
|
|
« Reply #16 on: March 15, 2017, 08:06:11 AM »
|
|
|
hi all, i let you here some of my progress, please feel free to give your honest opinion: My LDRXN: I let LDRXNZK exactly like LDRXN i don´t know if this is correct, it was 370 of load along all the map with previous remap, i think thats the reason why we saw on vagcom a dtc about air leaks between dv and manifold. KFFDLBTS: KFLBTS: with factor for lambda values with factor for AFR values (this way is easier for me)
|
|
« Last Edit: March 15, 2017, 08:08:47 AM by ivan »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KasperH
|
|
« Reply #17 on: March 15, 2017, 08:26:12 AM »
|
|
|
What is the hardware setup of the car?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ivan
Full Member
Karma: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 63
|
|
« Reply #18 on: March 15, 2017, 09:14:50 AM »
|
|
|
Sorry, the car is a 1.8t AUM (k03s) with big fmic,3" downpipe and 2,5" full exhaust, 3,5 bar fpr, rs4 sparks, and now tfsi coils (on picture are stock ones), conic filter silicone inlet pipe, forge 008 dv and a lot of things anulated like second air pump, evap catalist etc... Here i let you a few pictures of the baby, it`s a mk2 swap to 1.8t: the car is full made by us in our modest garage except software until now.
|
|
« Last Edit: March 15, 2017, 09:25:03 AM by ivan »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KasperH
|
|
« Reply #19 on: March 15, 2017, 10:26:25 AM »
|
|
|
That looks like a pretty nice setup. But that setup looks like k04(210/225HP) and not a k03s And I noticed that you have a 3.5 bar FPR, is the appropriate maps scaled for that?
|
|
« Last Edit: March 15, 2017, 10:29:15 AM by KasperH »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SB_GLI
|
|
« Reply #20 on: March 15, 2017, 10:56:36 AM »
|
|
|
But that setup looks like k04(210/225HP) and not a k03s that's a k03.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
adam-
|
|
« Reply #21 on: March 15, 2017, 11:00:53 AM »
|
|
|
BAM hot side for sure. How do you know it's a K03?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KasperH
|
|
« Reply #22 on: March 15, 2017, 11:11:36 AM »
|
|
|
that's a k03.
Piping, inlet, TIP and turbo position looks like K04
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ivan
Full Member
Karma: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 63
|
|
« Reply #23 on: March 15, 2017, 11:18:35 AM »
|
|
|
BAM hot side for sure. How do you know it's a K03?
Becacuse I made part of the swap it is k03s but we had to use manifold from a bam and turbo pipe to be able to use big fmic with not too long pipes.
|
|
« Last Edit: March 15, 2017, 11:20:37 AM by ivan »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ivan
Full Member
Karma: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 63
|
|
« Reply #24 on: March 15, 2017, 11:19:25 AM »
|
|
|
That looks like a pretty nice setup. But that setup looks like k04(210/225HP) and not a k03s And I noticed that you have a 3.5 bar FPR, is the appropriate maps scaled for that? actually i have no idea if the maps are scaled appropriate for that
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KasperH
|
|
« Reply #25 on: March 15, 2017, 11:57:01 AM »
|
|
|
KRKTE needs to be scaled What about injectors and MAF?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ivan
Full Member
Karma: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 63
|
|
« Reply #26 on: March 15, 2017, 12:02:03 PM »
|
|
|
KRKTE needs to be scaled What about injectors and MAF? Stock injetors and maf
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KasperH
|
|
« Reply #27 on: March 15, 2017, 12:08:58 PM »
|
|
|
Becacuse I made part of the swap it is k03s but we had to use manifold from a bam and turbo pipe to be able to use big fmic with not too long pipes. If it's a K03s your revised LDRXN would be better if reversed. Meaning that the little turbo is out of breath in the high RPMs, but spools fast in the low RPMs. So your highest load% should be low to mid RPM tapering down towards redline Don't get me wrong, the turbo could probably push the load, but it won't be happy doing it. How big is the FMIC? Stock injetors and maf
Okay, then KRKTE "should be enough"
|
|
« Last Edit: March 15, 2017, 12:11:09 PM by KasperH »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ivan
Full Member
Karma: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 63
|
|
« Reply #28 on: March 15, 2017, 12:56:41 PM »
|
|
|
If it's a K03s your revised LDRXN would be better if reversed. Meaning that the little turbo is out of breath in the high RPMs, but spools fast in the low RPMs. So your highest load% should be low to mid RPM tapering down towards redline Don't get me wrong, the turbo could probably push the load, but it won't be happy doing it. How big is the FMIC? Okay, then KRKTE "should be enough" the fmic was as big as possible, almost all the front of the car, you can see the pipes going to the intercooler in the picture. About LDRXN i made it that way becouse before engine died soon no power passing 4500 and too much on low rpm, it was very dificult to drive it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KasperH
|
|
« Reply #29 on: March 15, 2017, 01:07:15 PM »
|
|
|
the fmic was as big as possible, almost all the front of the car, you can see the pipes going to the intercooler in the picture.
About LDRXN i made it that way becouse before engine died soon no power passing 4500 and too much on low rpm, it was very dificult to drive it.
K03s isn't really a high performance turbo. Its an small eco turbo with a little extra, and it gets really hot if pushed hard and the FMIC sounds oversized for the turbo, but i bet high IATs post IC is'nt a problem
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|