|
nyet
|
 |
« Reply #270 on: October 27, 2019, 07:22:05 PM »
|
|
|
Your IMX is way too high again.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
totti
Full Member
Karma: +15/-29
 Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #271 on: October 27, 2019, 10:47:58 PM »
|
|
|
Your IMX is way too high again.
Sorry but I don't undestand why. I read all of the 18 pages from that topic and did everything based on that. What I didn't do is switch off LDDIMXN. My KFLDIMX is linear, I've choosed the axis values from the logs what I did. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
totti
Full Member
Karma: +15/-29
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #272 on: October 29, 2019, 12:20:25 AM »
|
|
|
What I would like to try is change that KFLDIMX map values that at 1450 will be 80 and make the linearization. Change the D parameter too to prevent big overshoots.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #273 on: October 29, 2019, 10:58:01 AM »
|
|
|
Whatever you did, the result of IMX+DRL is too high. Keep IMX linear, but something is amiss with DRL in that region
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
totti
Full Member
Karma: +15/-29
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #274 on: October 29, 2019, 11:47:53 AM »
|
|
|
Whatever you did, the result of IMX+DRL is too high. Keep IMX linear, but something is amiss with DRL in that region
What should I do? Yesterday I calculated with lower values in KFLDIMX and hopefully I will help to open wg before reach the limit. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SB_GLI
|
|
« Reply #275 on: October 29, 2019, 11:50:04 AM »
|
|
|
try to ADD 10% to your KFLDIMX pressure axis and report back (with logs)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
totti
Full Member
Karma: +15/-29
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #276 on: October 29, 2019, 12:01:09 PM »
|
|
|
try to ADD 10% to your KFLDIMX pressure axis and report back (with logs)
Zero out LDDIMXN? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
totti
Full Member
Karma: +15/-29
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #277 on: October 29, 2019, 12:35:28 PM »
|
|
|
try to ADD 10% to your KFLDIMX pressure axis and report back (with logs)
I've just set the kfldimx output from 90% to 80% at 1450mbar. Is this also good? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
totti
Full Member
Karma: +15/-29
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #278 on: November 01, 2019, 07:53:42 AM »
|
|
|
try to ADD 10% to your KFLDIMX pressure axis and report back (with logs)
I've modified the kfldimx regenerate the kfldrl add some to q2 and switch off LDDIMXN. The result is not much better. What I'm thinking currently is modify kfldrl below 3000 rpm to open the WG a little. 2750 rpm with 70-80% lower the 95% requests. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #279 on: November 01, 2019, 08:20:18 AM »
|
|
|
I've modified the kfldimx regenerate the kfldrl add some to q2 and switch off LDDIMXN. The result is not much better.
What I'm thinking currently is modify kfldrl below 3000 rpm to open the WG a little. 2750 rpm with 70-80% lower the 95% requests.
No, increase your request so P provides enough wg during spool. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
totti
Full Member
Karma: +15/-29
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #280 on: November 01, 2019, 08:28:53 AM »
|
|
|
No, increase your request so P provides enough wg during spool.
Which request? Sorry but I don't understand what should I increase. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #281 on: November 01, 2019, 08:29:16 AM »
|
|
|
Which request? Sorry but I don't understand what should I increase.
Boost request. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 01, 2019, 08:31:08 AM by nyet »
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
totti
Full Member
Karma: +15/-29
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #282 on: November 01, 2019, 08:36:37 AM »
|
|
|
Boost request.
What is the problem with my boost request now? It is flat and 1,35bar is enough for my config. I cannot set the pid to handle the current request? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #283 on: November 01, 2019, 09:36:57 AM »
|
|
|
What is the problem with my boost request now? It is flat and 1,35bar is enough for my config. I cannot set the pid to handle the current request?
request more during spool so the P part is large enough to generate 95 dc |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
totti
Full Member
Karma: +15/-29
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #284 on: November 01, 2019, 09:43:46 AM »
|
|
|
request more during spool so the P part is large enough to generate 95 dc
?? Does it solve my overboost problem? I'm running 95dc before I reach the target. Can you explain a little bit how does it solve the overboost? Thanks for the help and sorry if I ask stupid questions. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
