|
airtite
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: December 22, 2011, 05:42:48 AM »
|
|
|
For RPM axis the offset is 0 and not -48. In the rest, all is ok.
like this? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
airtite
|
|
« Reply #46 on: December 22, 2011, 05:43:46 AM »
|
|
|
sorry wrong screenshot
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheDSI
Full Member
Karma: +12/-0
 Offline
Posts: 78
|
|
« Reply #47 on: December 22, 2011, 04:41:22 PM »
|
|
|
you still have factor 0.25 insead of 40 .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rayce
Full Member
Karma: +6/-0
Offline
Posts: 66
|
|
« Reply #48 on: December 22, 2011, 09:18:19 PM »
|
|
|
Here are some s-shots... 1.8TT 225 to 280+
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 23, 2011, 07:27:12 PM by rayce »
|
Logged
|
04 TT 225BEA Quattro
68 T1 VW Street Rail 2.5 Turbo 18psi 1300lbs
|
|
|
|
airtite
|
|
« Reply #49 on: December 23, 2011, 12:48:21 AM »
|
|
|
you still have factor 0.25 insead of 40 .
OK changed from "0.25 * X" to "40 * X" the only issue is that I still have all 300kgh in the 320RPM column is that normal? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fredrik_a
Full Member
Karma: +25/-0
Offline
Posts: 221
|
|
« Reply #50 on: December 23, 2011, 02:02:28 AM »
|
|
|
I still have all 300kgh in the 320RPM column is that normal? I have not worked with your particular ECU HW/SW revision earlier but I've never come across (as far as I can remember) this fuction as anything else than 8x8, so in your case the 9x8 is not that common at least. Regardless, MAF restrictions at sub idle speed is not relevant anyway so... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
airtite
|
|
« Reply #51 on: December 23, 2011, 02:20:29 AM »
|
|
|
OK so my attempt then to modify all other values EXCEPT that column was a good idea then.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fredrik_a
Full Member
Karma: +25/-0
Offline
Posts: 221
|
|
« Reply #52 on: December 27, 2011, 05:28:20 AM »
|
|
|
OK so my attempt then to modify all other values EXCEPT that column was a good idea then.
Probably. If I were you I'd log the actual flow reported (using VCDS) to make sure that the current settings are actually not sufficient and that this is the reason you get a MIL. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
airtite
|
|
« Reply #53 on: December 28, 2011, 07:05:34 AM »
|
|
|
OK so my attempt then to modify all other values EXCEPT that column was a good idea then.
Probably. If I were you I'd log the actual flow reported (using VCDS) to make sure that the current settings are actually not sufficient and that this is the reason you get a MIL. After modifying that table no more MAF mil, I was logging VCDS block 002 values higher than was in that table. So now boost is good, cold starts are very lumpy but I still feel like there is more potential for my car so now I am looking at KFMIOP to see if that is influencing the power delivery. According too everything I have read here its the inverse of KFMIRL but now to find it in my file......... I dunno I guess my ecu is one of those difficult ones because not one of the maps seems too fit the 16x11 map I am using as a template  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
airtite
|
|
« Reply #54 on: December 28, 2011, 08:10:30 AM »
|
|
|
never mind found it
16A7C
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
airtite
|
|
« Reply #55 on: December 28, 2011, 08:26:57 AM »
|
|
|
scrap that 16AC0 looks correct, the load axis is the next issue?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
airtite
|
|
« Reply #56 on: December 28, 2011, 08:42:12 AM »
|
|
|
KFMIOP?
start address 16AA8 11x16
load axis address 16C08
rpm axis address 1276C
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
airtite
|
|
« Reply #57 on: December 28, 2011, 08:56:57 AM »
|
|
|
how do you figure out the factors for a map and its axis?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rob.mwpropane
|
|
« Reply #58 on: December 28, 2011, 09:39:06 AM »
|
|
|
how do you figure out the factors for a map and its axis?
I mean, I don't know if there is a technical way to do it, but I open up a closely related damos in WinOLS and copy the offsets over. I just make sure when I'm done it looks correct; text and 2d. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 28, 2011, 09:46:59 AM by rob.mwpropane »
|
Logged
|
This has nothing to do with cars but you can see my glorifying job at, www.MWPropane.com |
|
|
|
airtite
|
|
« Reply #59 on: December 28, 2011, 10:45:34 AM »
|
|
|
thanks Rob, having a hard time with the RPM axis for this map and I am not 100% sure about the load axis either.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
