Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21]
Author Topic: 06A906032HN, Implementation of launch-control and NLS  (Read 213678 times)
SpsWolf
Newbie
*

Karma: +2/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 16


« Reply #300 on: August 28, 2018, 12:39:01 AM »

Interesting, thanks !
So the ONLY way to know for sure is to disassemble ?
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12233


WWW
« Reply #301 on: August 28, 2018, 09:39:30 AM »

Interesting, thanks !
So the ONLY way to know for sure is to disassemble ?

Its actually worse than this; you never really know if you are stomping on something.

In this particular case, you know your'e stamping on something having to do with the RSA check, so you can disassemble the RSA routine and determine it that way, and move it to another arbitrary location.

And even then it doesn't tell you the new location isn't being used elsewhere.

You could try logging potential locations and see if they change, but even that isn't 100% because when YOU decide to change that location, maybe some other code is monitoring that location for a change.

Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
SpsWolf
Newbie
*

Karma: +2/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 16


« Reply #302 on: August 29, 2018, 12:56:46 AM »

Got it, thanks. After all, without that mystery it’d have been almost too easy (kidding  Grin ).
Logged
MAXBEDINI
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 4


« Reply #303 on: October 04, 2018, 03:41:07 AM »

It works!!!! Thanks to this incredible site. Always learning!!!! Smiley

https://youtu.be/eXW6vsHuM78

Logged
miigotu
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +2/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 36


« Reply #304 on: October 07, 2018, 02:36:45 AM »

It's not correct.
There are both flags present.
b_brems is at 0x00FD4E.C - "brake pedal pressed"
And b_br is used for brake switch checking - "brake test pressed"

Just want to note that I read this post before, which led me down a rabbit hole trying to find b_brems on my 032CL.
Later I learned that on some ECUs, b_brems IS actually B_br
If b_brems isn't dumped to the .ecu file, then look for b_br
Logged
TurboMMJ
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 22


« Reply #305 on: January 08, 2021, 11:47:47 AM »

almost there , read again and again pdf

but still afraid to test it for real

what conditions value would be as safe as possible for the IgnitionCutDuration: 0x17E04 size 2, 16bit LSB, conversion: X * 20 (ms) ?

Logged
bamofo
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +34/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 420


« Reply #306 on: January 08, 2021, 04:37:07 PM »

almost there , read again and again pdf

but still afraid to test it for real

what conditions value would be as safe as possible for the IgnitionCutDuration: 0x17E04 size 2, 16bit LSB, conversion: X * 20 (ms) ?



Pm me what you have done I’ll double check it if you like
Logged
TurboMMJ
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 22


« Reply #307 on: January 09, 2021, 12:05:21 PM »


 ::)and i just got a joker from @sn00k how conditions could be changed for your preferred values

example :

A6 01 50 46 0A 00 F0 55 E6 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF

LaunchRPM: 0x17E02 size 2, 16bit LSB, conversion: X * 0.25 (rpm)  - 5046 - 4650(16) = 18000(10) * 0.25= 4500 rpm launch set

i did set mine on 4000 rpm =  4000/0.25=16000 = 3E 80  and because of LSB should be write in the conditions 80 3E


Logged
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 1.062 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)