NefMoto > Noob Zone > Noob Questions (Moderator: turboat) > FKKVS, KFKHFM importance
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
Author Topic: FKKVS, KFKHFM importance  (Read 4007 times)
golfputtputt
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +6/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 367
« on: January 02, 2018, 09:15:44 AM »
How influential to STFT’s are these maps to a return fuel system 1.8t? They seem to be populated with actual values instead of just 1’s.
I got my hands on the FKKVS table calculator, i just need to make it work.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12270


WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2018, 02:18:25 PM »
FKKVS can be all ones. They are in all stock 2.7t files. All fine tuning is done in KFKHFM since it is assumed a return system is relatively linear, and the predominant fueling inaccuracies are from the MAF.

that said, there is more than one way to skin a cat. If you want to use FKKVS to fix up STFTs, there isn't anything inherently wrong with it.
Logged
ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
golfputtputt
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +6/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 367
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2018, 08:10:47 PM »
is it redundant to fix up both? Which one is primarily used is based on what? Results of trial and error essentially?
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12270


WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2018, 10:05:25 PM »
Quote from: golfputtputt on January 02, 2018, 08:10:47 PM
is it redundant to fix up both? Which one is primarily used is based on what? Results of trial and error essentially?

one is for MAF variance, other is for fueling variance. Both have the same effect, they are (basically) multiplicative. Please take a look at the FR
Logged
ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
golfputtputt
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +6/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 367
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2018, 06:51:54 AM »
Quote from: nyet on January 02, 2018, 10:05:25 PM
one is for MAF variance, other is for fueling variance. Both have the same effect, they are (basically) multiplicative. Please take a look at the FR

Thanks, yea i did but didn’t understand it. That document is dense and i have a lot of trouble understanding it 90% of the time.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12270


WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2018, 01:09:56 PM »
The difference:

If you fix up MAF problems in FKKVS, or fueling problems in KFKHFM, your load/maf readings will be inaccurate, even if your fueling ends up correct.
Logged
ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
Pages: [1]
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Navigation
Personal Tools
  • November 28, 2024, 03:49:24 AM
  • Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
    Did you miss your activation email?

    Login with username, password and session length
Search
 
Advanced Search
About Disclaimer
All Rights Reserved 2010 Nefarious Motosports
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.014 seconds with 16 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)