Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6
Author Topic: Mbox KFMIOP Interpolator  (Read 21588 times)
Bi-turbo
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 164


« Reply #60 on: September 15, 2014, 02:59:57 AM »

Look at how the standard car's LDXRN is as looking at this will give you a good idea how the turbos produce the power/flow/load
Logged
b4A4nowA6
Full Member
***

Karma: +1/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 117


« Reply #61 on: September 15, 2014, 02:03:13 PM »

Thanks,  I did what you suggested and now I am ready for a test run. .. After I get my checksum done. I am still waiting for tuner pro plugin, so if someone can please help me out. .  Smiley I posted in the checksum request area. Thanks again and can't wait to see if I made progress.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +443/-62
Offline Offline

Posts: 10104


WWW
« Reply #62 on: September 15, 2014, 04:10:20 PM »

ME7Sum will work with that file.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
b4A4nowA6
Full Member
***

Karma: +1/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 117


« Reply #63 on: September 15, 2014, 05:43:46 PM »

For some reason I can't use me7checker. I must have a blocker or something. . Ddilenger said something about turning off cookies or something.  I will try again though
Logged
Bi-turbo
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 164


« Reply #64 on: September 15, 2014, 11:32:25 PM »

As nyet said ME7sum will do it, ive used it countless times and it works without fail
Logged
b4A4nowA6
Full Member
***

Karma: +1/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 117


« Reply #65 on: September 16, 2014, 07:29:08 AM »

OK my bad.. I must be using the wrong one.
Logged
b4A4nowA6
Full Member
***

Karma: +1/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 117


« Reply #66 on: September 16, 2014, 08:03:58 AM »

I remember now why I did not look to use Me7Sum.. Everywhere I see it says that it does NOT support ME7.1.1        Is this not the case anymore? Or is the fact that I flashed my file to this R box then it will work now?
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +443/-62
Offline Offline

Posts: 10104


WWW
« Reply #67 on: September 16, 2014, 08:17:35 AM »

I remember now why I did not look to use Me7Sum.. Everywhere I see it says that it does NOT support ME7.1.1        Is this not the case anymore? Or is the fact that I flashed my file to this R box then it will work now?

M is 7.1
R is 7.1.1
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
b4A4nowA6
Full Member
***

Karma: +1/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 117


« Reply #68 on: September 18, 2014, 05:13:18 AM »

Well test drive complete.  I used the KFMIOP interpreter but I had to make a few adjustments to my table since I had more columns.   In the end, although my end output for kfmiop is 191, the rest of the table is raised  in the AfterSlow pic compared to the BeforeChanges pic.     I am not understanding what happened but I loaded everything just fine. Wnet for a spin and instantly noticed how much lazier the car felt After a couple logs It showed that before I was requesting around 1750-1900 mbar with 940 mbar showing at idle. I was not able to actually hold that much consistently but now with the After tune, Even though both (LDRXN_o_1A, KFMIOP) are raised across the board i am only holding at 1400mbar with the safe 940 at idle.. I am asuuming that I could just subtract whatever my idle mbar is from my load mbar and get actual boost. Anyone able to make sense of this?
The Worst part about this is not having the ability to correct checksums  myself.
Logged
carsey
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +6/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 397


« Reply #69 on: September 21, 2014, 09:53:29 AM »

Get some good data with ME7logger.

Is duty being restricted?

Your load is still pretty high up top.  NEver going to see that actual load on a k03s.

Have a look at my plots - and this in on a well flowing engine.

Logged
igo300
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +2/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 27


« Reply #70 on: September 23, 2014, 03:40:02 PM »

Is this on k03's
Logged
b4A4nowA6
Full Member
***

Karma: +1/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 117


« Reply #71 on: September 23, 2014, 06:15:52 PM »

Ok, I will give me7logger another try. Yes on k03. Thanks for your logs. I will get back ASAP
Logged
thelastleroy
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +18/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 260



« Reply #72 on: November 18, 2014, 06:29:06 PM »

I have a question about using this interpolator for best effect:

If I am to "Italian Tune" the entire KMFIRL table by 1.15, what is the appropriate "column header" number modification? Is it necessary to increase KMFIOP "column headers" to more than stock values for better performance, or is Italian tuning KMFIRL sufficient, and then generate KMFIOP from this?

In order for "maximum KMFIRL load should not exceed your maximum defined KFMIOP column", My maximum requested load will be 221.62, and so to keep with berTTos' recommendation, my last KMFIOP column should be 222?
Logged
prj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +315/-46
Offline Offline

Posts: 3711


« Reply #73 on: March 17, 2015, 01:21:44 PM »

...
« Last Edit: March 17, 2015, 02:42:50 PM by prj » Logged
ericpaulyoung
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 152


« Reply #74 on: May 13, 2015, 09:42:25 PM »

I had a file where the IRL map was changed by my tuner, but he did not update the IOP map. So I used your tool to update IOP, and I have better throttle control in partial throttle conditions! Smiley Thank you!  Cool
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.025 seconds with 18 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)