set MRESSL to 0, made no difference. Moving on.
According to the wiki,
mibas (from actual load) must not exceed the allowed torque limit (miszul) allowed for a given request from driver's pedal to avoid torque intervention
My mibas (at idle) is either on or off. 100 or 0 (3 times every second sometimes). Miszul is set to 99.22. So that means mibas is going above miszul 3 times a second....
This doesn't seem right. Is it?
If there is torque intervention, you will see mizsolv (specified torque) drop from following mibas (actual torque) to following mifa (or misolv) (requested torque).
mizsolv is 0 at idle at all times. it does not follow the 100,0 swings of mibas. Mifa fluctuates around 8.5-8.9 (so it is above mizsolv). misolv is 0 as well....so I suppose I could say mizsolv is following misolv....?
....mizsolv isnt following mibas (which, according to the wiki, seems like torque intervention.). It is following misolv (which, according to the wiki, seems like torque intervention..) but it's not following mifa (which, according to the wiki, if it's torque intervention....it should? Is mifa/misolv an either, or thing?)
Either way, a while ago, I raised KFMIZUFIL/KFMIZUOF to 100, it idled the same but also threw the ecu into some sort of aggressive limp mode where the ASR and EPC light went on. So I put those back to stock.
I put the IRL, IOP and WOP/2 values in from a 551K (which weren't all that different at idle.) That was a random idea that didnt work...
Is IOP intentionally too high from factory to apply torque intervention at steady states?
b_zwvz and b_zwvs are both turning off under load changes but on at all steady states including idle.
My understanding of ZUE is zwout can either follow zwbas or zwsol as an output?
Can anyone make this clear for me or provide an alternative idea?