Sorry I dont know how I missed this.
Thanks for your reply @DonkeyDub.
The progress update with this:
Managed to unbrick my ecu and flash it back to stock using Galletto + bootmode.
This file is indeed a GIAC file, and it wasnt 180HP, as I drove other cup editions and they were significantly slower than this one,
(now we will never find out, since then the new owner has reflashed to Stage 1).
In my (noob) analysis of that GIAC file,
It seemed that it had a NOREAD code in it *facepalm*, should have seen that argh.
The way they tuned this file was quite interesting, have not managed to see another style like it here on Nefmoto, though I know the legends know how to do it.
The file had -7.5 to -10 timing pull on WOT (VERY BAD), and I dont understand how an entire tuning company could make such a bad file.
The maps that were surprisingly similar between the GIAC file and stock:
LDRXN/_ZK
LAMFA
The maps that werent similar:
KFMIRL
KFMIOP axis
KFLDRXO
TLDOBAN
LDORXN
UADPLMX
KFMIOP load axis was increased but limited to 177.
KFMIRL was increased into the bare 200s in the higher range.
KFLDRXO was completely Zero'd.
TLDOBAN was completely Zero'd.
LDORXN was set to 127.5 in all except the first column.
UADPLMX was set to 4.98V (stock is 4.88V)
and while logging it pulled about -7.5 to -10 timing, but I chalked that up to that fact that the car was running more boost but stock LAMFA.
Something else I discovered while logging was that Desired Boost followed KFMIRL rather than LDRXN
Am I right to assume that under overboost, the ecu is more likely to follow KFMIRL values?
and am I right to assume that if we set the KFLDRXO, TLDOBAN, LDORXN and UADPLMX values as above, then we activate overboost mode indefinitely?
Anyway the above is just what I found, me as a noob. Thought I'd check in on this thread rather than leaving it dry.
Thanks everyone for your contributions, learned quite a lot.