Let's have a serious discussion of TQ Management

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]

« previous next »

Author

Topic: Let's have a serious discussion of TQ Management (Read 51580 times)

julex

Hero Member

Karma: +79/-4
Offline

Offline

Posts: 923

	Re: Let's have a serious discussion of TQ Management « Reply #75 on: April 05, 2012, 11:58:13 AM »

To quickly and truly nuke the PID you set TVLDMX = 0. Or so theory goes.


	Logged

Bische

Sr. Member

Karma: +25/-4
Offline

Offline

Posts: 397

	Re: Let's have a serious discussion of TQ Management « Reply #76 on: April 06, 2012, 11:01:16 PM »

How do you guys calculate optimal timing after the load axis has been changed in KFMIOP/KFZWOP?

If the KFZWOP/2 is left untouched with the load axis increased, what would be the symptoms? My limited knowledge lets me think that the timing intervention from TM would never let me reach desired ignition angle, or would it be vice versa? Would it not proper intervene to bring TQ in check on an actual TQ deviation?


	Logged

jibberjive

Hero Member

Karma: +23/-2
Offline

Offline

Posts: 536

	Re: Let's have a serious discussion of TQ Management « Reply #77 on: April 07, 2012, 06:40:56 AM »

I can only speak for the situation of mine and that I logged, but I already had a modified KFZWOP/2 and KFZW/2, and when I changed just the axes in KFMIOP (which is shared with KFZWOP), I didn't notice/log any torque/timing intervention at all in the upper parts of the map, where the axes had been changed. But like I said, that's just my particular case, with maps that had already been modified from stock anyways.


	Logged

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]

« previous next »

Jump to:

Navigation

Personal Tools

October 04, 2024, 01:33:47 AM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Navigation

Personal Tools

Search