Fawor
Newbie
Karma: +0/-2
 Offline
Posts: 19
|
 |
« on: April 18, 2021, 12:35:12 PM »
|
|
|
hi guys I'm a little bit tired already, and would be very thankfull if anybody would find a time to look into my file. I feel during every WOT, that something is 'holding up' the setup and is not letting him run full potential. In general: BAM with rods, big port head, J cam, 3,5" MAF, K04-064 turbo, 525, Walbro, IC etc Fueling in 5%, IAT temps maks +10 more then outside, so I'm not putting this logs here. Here are 2 logs where is already noticable, that throttle and ignition are playing around, load on 114 is waaaay under specified on the top and I have no more ideas what to do to 'free' this setup  It happens most after vvt switch, here over 5k. Groups 003, 020: http://vaglogi.pl/log-003_020_gmn71GQ.htmlGroups 114, 115: http://vaglogi.pl/log-114_115_9yJEs.htmlThanks from advance! |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 18, 2021, 12:36:51 PM by Fawor »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fawor
Newbie
Karma: +0/-2
Offline
Posts: 19
|
|
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2021, 12:36:08 PM »
|
|
|
Here is the file
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fawor
Newbie
Karma: +0/-2
Offline
Posts: 19
|
|
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2021, 12:43:33 PM »
|
|
|
here for comparison two logs on previous map - with same KFZW in map and less boost on DHBN made a lot better overall timing angle but this 'parachute' passing next rpms on WOT was noticable too. So that means for me, that something is holding this crap down  Or I am wrong? Groups 003, 020: http://vaglogi.pl/log-003_020_214W7.htmlGroups 001, 114, 115: http://vaglogi.pl/log-001_114_115_01dB6.html |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BlackT
|
|
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2021, 12:47:15 PM »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fawor
Newbie
Karma: +0/-2
Offline
Posts: 19
|
|
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2021, 12:57:17 PM »
|
|
|
yeah, with a version for about 1 year my cable won't to connect with software so this is why I'm still using vcds  I will try with newest version, thanks |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BlackT
|
|
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2021, 02:14:01 PM »
|
|
|
Soo you can invest a 1000€ in engine, but 10$ cable(cable that will save your engine) is problem to buy for more than 1 year?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fknbrkn
Hero Member
Karma: +186/-24
Offline
Posts: 1456
mk4 1.8T AUM
|
|
« Reply #6 on: April 18, 2021, 02:45:48 PM »
|
|
|
maf readings are too low
no lambda logs
what is the "J cam"?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fawor
Newbie
Karma: +0/-2
Offline
Posts: 19
|
|
« Reply #7 on: April 19, 2021, 12:43:00 AM »
|
|
|
Soo you can invest a 1000€ in engine, but 10$ cable(cable that will save your engine) is problem to buy for more than 1 year?
invest is not an issue. Till the time I was sure, that logging thru vcds is enough for me, that's all. Don't be mean... "j" is a sign on a cam, such 'names' we are using in europe. This is a cam from NA ADR big port engine. Exhaust is stock, Intake is from ADR. Lambda is on point and that's why I didn't want to put to many infos in topic. 0,83 on 3k to 0,79 on top, with almost 0 trims. MAF readings - overall as I'm watching 064 setups for 5 years always were about 210-220. And this about 220gram was making around 330. But mine for sure don't have 330. That's why I'm looking for help. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fknbrkn
Hero Member
Karma: +186/-24
Offline
Posts: 1456
mk4 1.8T AUM
|
|
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2021, 05:06:23 AM »
|
|
|
Maf should be around 250-260gs with that boost
Adr cam is the issue
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2021, 11:16:58 AM »
|
|
|
logging thru vcds is enough
It is not. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
Fawor
Newbie
Karma: +0/-2
Offline
Posts: 19
|
|
« Reply #10 on: April 28, 2021, 01:29:30 PM »
|
|
|
Maf should be around 250-260gs with that boost
Adr cam is the issue
Hmm you think so? I've tuned one stock bottom end and stock CR 1.8t in Polo on k03s hybrid - the same setup on stock head and then with big port and ADR cam. Even with such small turbo gain was enormously good, 20gram whole range, 'eats' 20* timing totally happy, makes around 280bhp on 98 and stock manifold. Talked with two other tuners and both said, that they can not find any real mistakes in my soft, logs are looking good...Will see. Already bought an cable on atmega proc so probably I will upload some real logs after the weekend. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Blazius
|
|
« Reply #11 on: April 28, 2021, 02:03:44 PM »
|
|
|
Hmm you think so? I've tuned one stock bottom end and stock CR 1.8t in Polo on k03s hybrid - the same setup on stock head and then with big port and ADR cam. Even with such small turbo gain was enormously good, 20gram whole range, 'eats' 20* timing totally happy, makes around 280bhp on 98 and stock manifold.
Talked with two other tuners and both said, that they can not find any real mistakes in my soft, logs are looking good...Will see. Already bought an cable on atmega proc so probably I will upload some real logs after the weekend.
You have to watch out with the N/A cams, you cant use both, and your choice will depends on the cam revision you have, the specs should be out there for almost all cams plug them into an overlay and try to not have much overlap on boost, if u got VVT then its even better. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fawor
Newbie
Karma: +0/-2
Offline
Posts: 19
|
|
« Reply #12 on: April 28, 2021, 02:36:19 PM »
|
|
|
I have ofcourse just intake adr cam, ex is stock. With such setups cars with 300+ perform really well, as I saw
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
