zillarob
Full Member
Karma: +13/-1
 Offline
Posts: 152
|
 |
« Reply #150 on: February 07, 2013, 07:29:26 PM »
|
|
|
Holy badass boostage, Batman!
Got my vote for insta-Hero Member upgrade, lol!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #151 on: February 07, 2013, 09:48:18 PM »
|
|
|
if i could i would. bt is my hero
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
|
britishturbo
|
|
« Reply #152 on: February 07, 2013, 10:12:53 PM »
|
|
|
Hi All by Hex comparing the code around the changes on the M box on the front page I think I've found the locations where the program code needs to be changed in an Opel Z20LET bin
Can anyone double check my work who is a bit more up to speed with ASM work.
I did find more than one possible location for a couple variables so I may have selected the wrong one, or this ECU infact has more functions that needs scaling.
So this is untested and I warn anyone who wants to use this file to double check it first.
If you can post the raw bin file I will take a look for you. There are a lot more possible locations than changes needed... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rabbid
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 55
|
|
« Reply #153 on: February 08, 2013, 02:10:20 AM »
|
|
|
If you need it I can do later, but the project is an unmodified bin file. If you have WinOLS you'll be able to export the bin file.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rabbid
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 55
|
|
« Reply #154 on: February 08, 2013, 02:35:35 AM »
|
|
|
Here we go, file attached!
Here is what I believe the values to be:
50032 pvdk_w 1013 division #1
50696 pvdk_w 1013 division #2
50D7E fvpdkds 1013 division #1
50F42 fvpdkds 1013 division #2
5143E fho_w 1013 division
522E2 frhodkr_w 1013 division
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 08, 2013, 02:40:37 AM by Rabbid »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rabbid
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 55
|
|
« Reply #155 on: February 08, 2013, 04:10:25 PM »
|
|
|
I've run through the map today made all the changes I can from the text file on first page for my friends car. He was running 25psi on open loop but it was never that smooth to be honest, so we've dropped him to 1 bar boost at the moment put all the put a 3 bar map sensor in scaled it and verified its reading the same as the 2.5 bar did. Reset all the LDRPID stuff and so on.
Tomorrow we're just gonna try this file with the 5120 stuff patched in and see what happens unless someone can before tomorrow verify my asm change locations and tells me they're wrong. My only fear is crashing the ECU but hopefully if it doesn't run right it won't crash and we can just revert back a file version pending further investigation.
While going through the text file and scaling maps I noticed the Me1.5.5 doesn't have quite a few of the maps, either missing from my map pack or not in the ECU I'm not sure.. My only other thing to think about is whether there is any other additional maps this ecu might have.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
s5fourdoor
|
|
« Reply #156 on: February 08, 2013, 04:33:23 PM »
|
|
|
Just want to confirm here. Bische, is the part number for your VW TDI 4-bar sensor: 03K906051 ?
Just want to be 100% here that we are talking about the exact same sensor for the 1.8t and 2.7t guys to swap over.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bische
|
|
« Reply #157 on: February 09, 2013, 01:23:11 AM »
|
|
|
Just want to confirm here. Bische, is the part number for your VW TDI 4-bar sensor: 03K906051 ?
Just want to be 100% here that we are talking about the exact same sensor for the 1.8t and 2.7t guys to swap over.
Yes, I got mine on darksidedevelopments. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
julex
|
|
« Reply #158 on: February 09, 2013, 11:33:52 AM »
|
|
|
I confirm that's the part # albeit I am not using mine just yet. I did fit it though, it fits electrically. When ordering, make sure to get that grommet as well (extra few bucks) as that's what makes it fit our TBB hole.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
s5fourdoor
|
|
« Reply #159 on: February 09, 2013, 09:22:07 PM »
|
|
|
038906051C is the 3-bar TDI sensor, available in the USA....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #160 on: February 09, 2013, 09:24:05 PM »
|
|
|
3bar absolute=29psi=stock sensor? Wouldn't you need a minimum of a 4 bar sensor to extend the range?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
|
britishturbo
|
|
« Reply #161 on: February 09, 2013, 09:27:24 PM »
|
|
|
3bar absolute=29psi=stock sensor? Wouldn't you need a minimum of a 4 bar sensor to extend the range?
Stock is 2.5 bar = 22.5psi |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #162 on: February 09, 2013, 09:30:59 PM »
|
|
|
Gotcha, wasn't quite sure  I guess 3 bar would be better than stock, but if you're already scaled to properly use a 5 bar it seems a waste of perfectly good headroom. At the very least 4 bar, as I really doubt anyone running stock engine management would exceed that. BTW-I credit this thread in bringing back a few long-absent members. I'm loving it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
|
britishturbo
|
|
« Reply #163 on: February 09, 2013, 09:33:00 PM »
|
|
|
Gotcha, wasn't quite sure I guess 3 bar would be better than stock, but if you're already scaled to properly use a 5 bar it seems a waste of perfectly good headroom. At the very least 4 bar, as I really doubt anyone running stock engine management would exceed that. BTW-I credit this thread in bringing back a few long-absent members. I'm loving it. Even with stock map its worth doing! You get headroom for ps_w... which means no need to under scale maf! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
marcellus
|
|
« Reply #164 on: February 09, 2013, 10:39:52 PM »
|
|
|
I guess the only thing that really bugs me about this is fact that the sensors everybody is using has to be ordered from overseas. I really would like the option of if the MAP sensor failed, my car not being out of commission, or having to carry around a stock Map file on my laptop all the time just in case.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
