lighter flywheel = less inertia to carry through a starting load (A/C engaging for example). On the other, it's easier to accelerate the load with a lighter flywheel -- so maybe less torque reserve is needed, not more?)
I was thinking it wouldn't be just the starting load but the constant load after the accessory has been engaged. like while the A/C is running, alternator load, PS pump, etc, or while all of it is happening. So a spike and then constant load. The ECU, I'm thinking would be using up more of the available timing with the lighter flywheel compared to a stock unit installed, If there were no changes made to the software. Does that seem correct?
I haven't found a thread in here yet that really goes in depth about what to change in the software for light flywheels or switching from a dual mass to single mass. I'm thinking idle fueling would be needing some refinement because it should take less fuel to keep the lighter flywheel turning right? or will it take more because the lack of inertia compared to the stock flywheel?
Who wants to start a light flywheel thread?