Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 22
Author Topic: My Tial 605 Tune Thread  (Read 280046 times)
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +58/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 1056


« Reply #195 on: October 02, 2011, 08:43:11 PM »

Logs from today...  Still getting that damn bump in load which is effecting my fueling.. I don't get why it's doing it....




























Logged

SCHNELL ENGINEERING BLOG ·  STANDALONE ECUS · TUNING · DYNO · WIRING · PARTS · VEMS
Google Talk: NOTORIOUS.VR
n00bs start here: http://s4wiki.com/wiki/Tuning
berTTos
Full Member
***

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 91


« Reply #196 on: October 04, 2011, 07:13:48 AM »



are these torque monitoring values stock? -

RLVMXN
RLVSMXN
KFMIZUFIL
« Last Edit: October 04, 2011, 08:22:45 AM by berTTos » Logged
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +58/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 1056


« Reply #197 on: October 04, 2011, 11:16:21 AM »



are these torque monitoring values stock? -

RLVMXN
RLVSMXN
KFMIZUFIL


From what I can remember yet.
Logged

SCHNELL ENGINEERING BLOG ·  STANDALONE ECUS · TUNING · DYNO · WIRING · PARTS · VEMS
Google Talk: NOTORIOUS.VR
n00bs start here: http://s4wiki.com/wiki/Tuning
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Online Online

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #198 on: October 04, 2011, 11:24:38 AM »

I'd scale your MAF back a bit, or possibly increase rlmax

It looks like you are hitting your spec load, and the ECU is capping something.

I'll have to dig through the FR.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +58/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 1056


« Reply #199 on: October 04, 2011, 05:14:47 PM »

Quite possible... I'm gonna try to scale back the MAF again when I have some time... I also want to try fueling via LAMFA as well...
Logged

SCHNELL ENGINEERING BLOG ·  STANDALONE ECUS · TUNING · DYNO · WIRING · PARTS · VEMS
Google Talk: NOTORIOUS.VR
n00bs start here: http://s4wiki.com/wiki/Tuning
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Online Online

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #200 on: October 04, 2011, 06:46:42 PM »

Here is my decode of the calc of rl (load) based on the FR.

Code:
rl = rfges - rfagr
    rfagr = rfges * (250 hPa)/ps (MAF path)
    rfges = pbr - pirg * fupsrl (MAF path)
        pirg = Lowpass(pirgro) * fho (internal residual gas AGR)
            pirgro = (select a prg based on sumod)
                from PRGNM, PRGSUNM, PRG2SUNM, PRG3SUNM (dependent on rpm)
            fho = (correction factor based on ambient pressure)
        fupsrl = Lowpass(psrlro) * ftbr
            psrlro = (select a url based on sumod)
                from URLM, URLSUNM, URL2SUNM, URL3SUNM (dependent on rpm)
            ftbr = (correction based on modeled combustion chamber temp)
                from CWTEMPK, FAKTABGM, FWFTBRTA, FWLKFTBR
                    (dependent on ps, tmot, tans, etc).
        pbr = ps * fpbrkds (MAF path)
            fpbrkds = KFPBRK -> KFPBRKNW (based on fnwue - cam position fader)
    ps = psfg+psagr (MAF path)
        psfg =  sum (0->psmx-(250 hPa)) (rlroh-rlw)*fvisrm
            fvisrm = KISRM * ftsr * 10.13
                ftsr = (tsges + 273)/273
                    tsges = tans (SY_TFA=false) (?IAT downstream of EGR?)

rlroh = rlfgroh (MAF path)
    rlfgroh =
        if (B_dk & B_lm) RLNOT (88->21 for rpm 480->2000)
        if (B_negldrg | E_lkvdk | (SY_EGFE, !B_hfm, etc) rlfdkroh (speed density)
        if (B_mxrlroh) rlfdkroh/fkmsdk (lambts < 1, rldkofk-rlflmroh > DDRLDKZU)
            rlfdkroh = (mste+msdk)/(nmot*KUMSRL)
                mste = (tank ventilation airmass in intake)
                msdk = (air flow over throttle plate)
            fkmsdk = integral(fkmsdkg)
        rlflmroh (MAF path)
            rlflmroh = (mshfms+mste)/(nmot*KUMSRL) - drllad (MAF path)
                drllad =
                    if (B_edsl) 0
                        B_edsl = pvdkds>PVDKMX (dependent on rpm)
                    else pvdkds-lowpass(pvdkds) * KVLAD

pvdkds = MAP output after DSLGRAD/DSLOFS, max 2560
    (boost pressure actual)

mshfms = MAX((mlhfmm - MLOFS) * KFKHFM, MLMIN) (MAF path)
    mlhfmm = mlhfmas/anzhfma (windowed average of MLHFM) (MAF path)
        mlhfmas = SUM(MLHFM)
        anzhfma = counter

SY_EGFE
    Bit0: HFM vorhanden (B_hfmv)                           1?
    Bit1: Drucksensor hinter der DK (B_dssv)              0?
    Bit2: Drucksensor vor der DK (B_dslvh)                1?
    Bit3: Umgebungsdrucksensor;Pu-Sensor (B_dsuv)  1?


Yea. It's a mess. I'll have to think about possible sources of that notch.

If you really care, we may need to log a few more things Smiley
« Last Edit: October 04, 2011, 11:42:31 PM by nyet » Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +58/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 1056


« Reply #201 on: October 04, 2011, 08:31:59 PM »

I'm down for whatever...

I need to get Setzi's logger setup and running...

Do we have a decent/default config for all the variables I should be logging? 
Logged

SCHNELL ENGINEERING BLOG ·  STANDALONE ECUS · TUNING · DYNO · WIRING · PARTS · VEMS
Google Talk: NOTORIOUS.VR
n00bs start here: http://s4wiki.com/wiki/Tuning
Snow Trooper
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +90/-24
Offline Offline

Posts: 689


WWW
« Reply #202 on: October 06, 2011, 02:19:55 PM »

why do you start with a lower WGDC, arent you on aftermarket gates?

I think your low DC during spool up is hurting.

as for that load bump, no idea.

Logged

cartoons?
6A 61 72 65 64 40 76 6C 6D 73 70 65 63
berTTos
Full Member
***

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 91


« Reply #203 on: October 06, 2011, 04:35:51 PM »



are these torque monitoring values stock? -

RLVMXN
RLVSMXN
KFMIZUFIL


Try loosesning up the torque limit tables --- solved my torque intervention issues.  If you loosen these up and your dip is replaced with a throttle cut and Torque Monitoring Limit Exceeded code then I bet you need to scale back your MAF.


From what I can remember yet.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Online Online

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #204 on: October 06, 2011, 04:44:13 PM »

Bert, according to the FR, the output of RLVMXN/RLVSMXN only goes into KFMIOP if SY_TURBO is false!

If SY_TURBO is true, rlmax goes into KFMIOP. to generate mimax with FMIVL.



I can find no other reference to RLVMXN anywhere in the FR!
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
berTTos
Full Member
***

Karma: +24/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 91


« Reply #205 on: October 06, 2011, 07:59:58 PM »

Bert, according to the FR, the output of RLVMXN/RLVSMXN only goes into KFMIOP if SY_TURBO is false!

If SY_TURBO is true, rlmax goes into KFMIOP. to generate mimax with FMIVL.



I can find no other reference to RLVMXN anywhere in the FR!

I noticed this too, however, it worked in my current tune.  I had a weird load decrease which was eliminated by addressing those 3 tables. 

Another instance of black magic - I know... the appropriate variables need to be logged to confirm exactly what is going on. 

Logged
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +58/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 1056


« Reply #206 on: October 13, 2011, 06:24:17 PM »

My next move is to underscale my MAF some more to bring my load range back to normal levels... but I will keep that in mind for sure if I am still having issues with timing dropout's and TQ intervention.
Logged

SCHNELL ENGINEERING BLOG ·  STANDALONE ECUS · TUNING · DYNO · WIRING · PARTS · VEMS
Google Talk: NOTORIOUS.VR
n00bs start here: http://s4wiki.com/wiki/Tuning
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +58/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 1056


« Reply #207 on: October 18, 2011, 01:58:10 PM »

Alright tried something completely different 2 days ago... and here are the logs from that...

I started with a completely stock M-box and transferred only the MAF scaling from the NefMoto STG3 file... the rest is all new... 

interesting results to say the least... the car feels pretty strong and for the most part fairly smooth (I can feel the ign drop outs though).

Initial fueling is based on LAMFA (went a little more aggressive to see how it would all react), IOP load points are rescaled and go now to 205... what I don't understand at this point is why the ECU is pulling that much timing and why my req. boost curve looks the way it does... also the "notch" in the engine load doesn't make all that much sense either, but I'm going to try and work through this and see what I can turn this into.

any comments?

Logs (.csv posted as an attachment)....




























Logged

SCHNELL ENGINEERING BLOG ·  STANDALONE ECUS · TUNING · DYNO · WIRING · PARTS · VEMS
Google Talk: NOTORIOUS.VR
n00bs start here: http://s4wiki.com/wiki/Tuning
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Online Online

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #208 on: October 18, 2011, 02:25:17 PM »

Timing looks fine to me.

You could probably add a bit more fuel.

Need a wideband to see if your req AFR is lining up right with actual.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +58/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 1056


« Reply #209 on: October 18, 2011, 02:39:07 PM »

yeah I'm still only using my eyes to "log" from my WBO2 gauge... for the most part it looks alright... can use some more fuel in a few places...

timing "looks" ok, but not great... seems like the load has shifted and now it's running more timing in the low/spool end and less up top towards redline... so I def need to fix that.

Also the KV are about the same as my other tunes but KR is higher which I believe is tune related (not necessarily actual knock).

Either way looks to be a promising start... definitely needs more messaging...
Logged

SCHNELL ENGINEERING BLOG ·  STANDALONE ECUS · TUNING · DYNO · WIRING · PARTS · VEMS
Google Talk: NOTORIOUS.VR
n00bs start here: http://s4wiki.com/wiki/Tuning
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 22
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.024 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)