Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Injektor  (Read 15264 times)
adam-
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +123/-33
Offline Offline

Posts: 2179


« Reply #15 on: October 09, 2014, 02:40:23 PM »

I think he means whatever your current KRKTE is, add 0.020 onto it.

So; if your new KRKTE is: 0.0518, add 0.020 onto it, so it becomes 0.0718.

Yeah? Smiley
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #16 on: October 09, 2014, 03:13:18 PM »

I think he means whatever your current KRKTE is, add 0.020 onto it.

So; if your new KRKTE is: 0.0518, add 0.020 onto it, so it becomes 0.0718.

Yeah? Smiley

Correct.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Online Online

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #17 on: October 09, 2014, 03:15:17 PM »

Stupid question: wouldn't scaling krkte make more sense than an additive offset?
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
Lost
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +21/-14
Offline Offline

Posts: 556


« Reply #18 on: October 10, 2014, 01:01:03 PM »

Correct.

If you mean adding 20% on KRKTE to work with e85, then this would not be right.
It would be 0.0518x1.20 = 0,06216
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Online Online

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #19 on: October 10, 2014, 01:47:50 PM »

If you mean adding 20% on KRKTE to work with e85, then this would not be right.
It would be 0.0518x1.20 = 0,06216

.02 is not 20% of .0518 Tongue
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
Lost
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +21/-14
Offline Offline

Posts: 556


« Reply #20 on: October 10, 2014, 01:59:19 PM »

.02 is not 20% of .0518 Tongue

Multiplying by 1.2 on org value is adding 20%.
That is what was the point isn't it?
20% + fuel b/c converting too E85.
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #21 on: October 10, 2014, 02:01:53 PM »

If you mean adding 20% on KRKTE to work with e85, then this would not be right.
It would be 0.0518x1.20 = 0,06216

Just add .020.

.0518+.020=.0718

I bet it's very close.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Online Online

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #22 on: October 10, 2014, 02:08:08 PM »

Multiplying by 1.2 on org value is adding 20%.
That is what was the point isn't it?
20% + fuel b/c converting too E85.

Generally, you add around 40% for E85... or so I'm told Smiley

Just add .020.

.0518+.020=.0718

I bet it's very close.

I bet adding 39% is pretty close too Smiley
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
Lost
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +21/-14
Offline Offline

Posts: 556


« Reply #23 on: October 10, 2014, 02:15:50 PM »

Just add .020.

.0518+.020=.0718

I bet it's very close.

Ok, Where did you get .020 from?
If taking 40% roughly from .0518, then it is correct.
« Last Edit: October 10, 2014, 02:20:59 PM by Mocke » Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #24 on: October 10, 2014, 02:23:25 PM »

To be clear, I was just being lazy with the .020.

40 percent is a better method to use.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
Lost
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +21/-14
Offline Offline

Posts: 556


« Reply #25 on: October 10, 2014, 02:55:51 PM »

To be clear, I was just being lazy with the .020.

40 percent is a better method to use.

Yes, for Learning purposes. It was a spoon feed answer from your part, but I doubt, OP understood the process Smiley
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Online Online

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #26 on: October 10, 2014, 03:14:27 PM »

Yes, for Learning purposes. It was a spoon feed answer from your part

Absolutely; sometimes it is really hard to figure out what to spoon feed gently (generalize), and what to be explicit on...

To the OP: sorry to hijack the thread Smiley
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
ericpaulyoung
Full Member
***

Karma: +5/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 149


« Reply #27 on: October 11, 2014, 04:20:56 AM »

I thought the larger absolute value of KRKTE, the smaller the injector. So wouldn't you actually subtract 20-40% from the KRKTE value?

epy
Logged
ericpaulyoung
Full Member
***

Karma: +5/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 149


« Reply #28 on: October 11, 2014, 04:34:23 AM »

Nevermind, I just figured out what I said was wrong. You are not actually adding a larger injector, just scaling the ones you have for E85.
epy
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.035 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)