Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 1 
 on: Today at 12:51:48 PM 
Started by fredrik_a - Last post by prometey1982
I have reached out to a couple other tuners but was told to just change the cylinder head or check with this forum.
You can just modify crankshaft cover plate and install your old crankshafts. From my point of view intake VVT adds torque in low RPM range.

 2 
 on: Today at 11:09:25 AM 
Started by fredrik_a - Last post by sevenstrails8
Hi, I am in need to have a tune done to my 2005 xc70. Before anything, I realize that the "best" option here would be to put on the proper head, I get it. At this point its not an option currently and just seeing if anyone can do this for me. (paid of course, not asking for a handout)

I bought the xc70 at auction and turned out to have cracked block, my mechanic was able to find a B5234T3 from a 2001 s60 t5. We verified with a tuner if he would be able do a t5 tune and disable the intake solenoid, and he confirmed so we went with the swap. That tuner has now closed his books and I don't know when they will reopen. I have reached out to a couple other tuners but was told to just change the cylinder head or check with this forum.

as it stands the car has the B5234T3 along with the 16t turbo and do88 intercooler. I have green injectors on hand, but can get the blues if needed. I attached the bin file below. If anyone is able to help with this it would be much appreciated. TIA

 3 
 on: Today at 07:20:29 AM 
Started by unicorn89 - Last post by unicorn89
you can try the open source tool and post full screen output:
http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=18686.msg164642#msg164642
ME7BootEeprom 9600 -read -SSC 1 Port4 Pin7 512 eeprom.ori
ME7BootEeprom 9600 -write -SSC 1 Port4 Pin7 modified.bin

on read you can use decimal 512 or 0x100 as size indicator

Thanks this worked without fail.

 4 
 on: Today at 07:20:13 AM 
Started by 360trev - Last post by ecuprog7
readout looks good to me, try to use eeprom immo tool to verify checksums

 5 
 on: Today at 06:52:42 AM 
Started by 360trev - Last post by ejg3855
you are correct I was thinking the memory chip.

it is confirmed to be a 95160.

updated imgur link.

Here is what I Read does it look right?


 6 
 on: Today at 06:28:24 AM 
Started by 360trev - Last post by prj
None of your photos contain the EEPROM chip, it's on the other side of the PCB iirc.

 7 
 on: Today at 06:18:06 AM 
Started by 360trev - Last post by ejg3855
I am not sure I have seen conflicting information on this chip that it might be 95040 because its early?

2006 07K Beetle Manual Transmission

0 261 208 869

See Photos

https://imgur.com/a/1jFQ4I7

 8 
 on: Today at 02:25:50 AM 
Started by fredrik_a - Last post by prj
S4wiki lists what needs to be done for rear o2 delete:
https://s4wiki.com/wiki/Tuning#Cat_and_O2_complete_removal_and_DTCs

The CWKONLS and CWKONABG mods are not required, but in addition to that paragraph ESKONF also needs to be modified to remove the rear o2 heater dtc.

 9 
 on: Today at 01:32:28 AM 
Started by fredrik_a - Last post by WhizzMan


Recently installed greens I had laying around since I was replacing the intake manifold gasket anyway.

Getting a rich code now (obviously) as well as an intermittent rear O2 fault.  Which doesn't make sense since I bought the "tune" when I was already catless.  Figured that would have been completely coded out.


The rich code is obviously because your front O2 is still functioning (it shoud be!) and the greens put more fuel out per millisecond of activation. Coding out the rear O2 is much more work than disabling the setting of the DTC for a catalist efficiency, which in all likelyhood is what was done on your tune. This obviously requires the rear O2 to still be physically in the car and electricly connected up and functioning. The DTC you are getting is related to the rear O2 having intermittent connectivity problems or actually malfunctioning. I wouldn't bother myself to try and code it out and just replace the rear O2 sensor and check the connectivity.

 10 
 on: Yesterday at 11:05:49 PM 
Started by 360trev - Last post by ecuprog7
From the log i only see that the chip select is not the problem, please write which ecu you are using and if known the eeprom chip type on it.
MH-Auto states on this ME7.1.1 Ecu is a 95160 eeprom so you need to adapt the call line. 95160 is type 0 and size needs to be 0x800 for full read, if there are only zeros or FF´s in upper half you can use 0x400

read: ME7BootEeprom 9600 -read -SSC 0 Port6 Pin3 0x800 Read.ori
write: ME7BootEeprom 9600 -write -SSC 0 Port6 Pin3 immoOff.bin

the driver used for read and write 95040/5P08C3  against the 95080-95320 is different. please read again, your readout is wrong, if you read with a 95160 with type 1 the readout has an extra byte like ff on start of each line. i will do it on an me7.1.1 in the afternoon and post logs

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.012 seconds with 14 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)