Chris sells a product, cable and software for flashing yourself, much like the subaru guys, yes he charges for his NON opensource software, NON opensource hardware(or cheap) and for checksumming/modifications that most have a hard time doing.  The package is good enough to tune a car well, i have done it personally and like the package a lot.  Your paying for the software development, hardware, checksum abilities that very few understand on this board.





Matt-  There are plenty of files and definitions on this site that can get you started, tell us what ecu code you have, and then you can be informed of what you need or even some links.  06A906032LP/PL Damos on this site will take care of any wideband car go to think of it......

http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=866.0

I don't know patent law and really don't care.

To me, it's an issue of ethics and I fail to see how the opinion of a few become a fact.

Reverse engineering and copying are different things.

In RE, the goal is to figure out how something works, not to just copy/steal/recycle.

In the immortal words of cpl. hicks...

I don't much care what happens now to this thread. There was a lot of trolling, but eventually a user gave me the info / link I needed to move along.

Maybe I asked wrong to begin with, and some feel it's unethical, but if I own Maestro and I have no intention of selling or distributing files I don't see why using a tables I've already put together (using Maestro) would be a bad thing... Especially if Maestro doesn't offer a feature I'd like to have???

Ethics questoin: If I were selling or distributing the file I could see where that could be unethical, but by the time it's custom tuned to my car for E85 (which isn't offered by Eurodyne) isn't it more my work than Eurodynes (especially since it'll never see anyone else's ecu)?