Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 16
Author Topic: 2001 Audi A4 with 2.7 single turbo swap  (Read 182363 times)
marcellus
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +2/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 472


« Reply #165 on: May 03, 2012, 10:23:00 AM »

I have been in contact with Fleece performance (company that sells the controller) and they still havent made anything universal.  Their current system runs on the stock truck's CAN-BUS or whatever they use.  

It would be nice to have full control though.  All the way open at cruise to drop EGT, closed at idle for noise reduction, partially open until need for fast spool.  

I am working on learning the PID programming.  Right now its just trial and error and a ton of reading and asking questions.  Thanks for letting me know I am not doing it right though and pointin me in a better direction.  I need that. I actaully want this thing to be properly set up to do what I want it do do, not a big giant work around to trick the ECM into doing what I want.

Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #166 on: May 03, 2012, 11:00:33 AM »

Either way, if his target boost is past the MAP, he'll end up running openloop wg anyway, and PID programming will be a big waste of time Wink

Marcellus: do you plan to run your turbo past 2550 mBar?
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
marcellus
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +2/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 472


« Reply #167 on: May 03, 2012, 11:10:00 AM »

Map limit?  Yes.  So its a big waste? What should I use instead? 
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #168 on: May 03, 2012, 11:12:05 AM »

Set your requested boost to max, and tune the last row of your wg linearization table to the wg profile you want.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
marcellus
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +2/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 472


« Reply #169 on: May 03, 2012, 11:45:01 AM »

Like this?

Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #170 on: May 03, 2012, 01:23:45 PM »

You're going to have TERRIBLE part throttle response with that map.

In particular, you should NEVER go from a higher value to a lower value for a given input RPM over a range of non-linearized wg inputs.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
marcellus
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +2/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 472


« Reply #171 on: May 03, 2012, 01:37:43 PM »

The whole map or the last row?



Its is a rough example just see if I am getting what you are saying.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2012, 01:42:13 PM by marcellus » Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #172 on: May 03, 2012, 03:14:10 PM »

You really want to have *some* response to the PID in operating ranges where the req boost will be under the MAP...
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
marcellus
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +2/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 472


« Reply #173 on: May 03, 2012, 07:05:27 PM »

I hate clamps. 

Logged
marcellus
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +2/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 472


« Reply #174 on: May 03, 2012, 09:24:29 PM »

This?

Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #175 on: May 03, 2012, 09:31:09 PM »

No. And all that 95% at low rpms also makes no sense.

A perfectly linear WG system would be 10 in all 10 column cells, 20 in all 20 column cells, etc.

you should *start* with that, and work out what areas are non-linear.

Honestly, though I feel you are really out of your depth. I'm not sure there is an easy way to explain to you what this table does. Do you have a math or engineering background? That might help me figure out how to explain it to you based on what background you have (through analogies).

Then, the next step would be to talk to the WG manufacturer to provide information about it's response characteristics.

Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
marcellus
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +2/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 472


« Reply #176 on: May 03, 2012, 10:07:30 PM »

I am sorry man.  I am a CNC programmer/machinist/Tooling guy.

I thought that since I set theRXN to max that it was only going to pull from the last column.  I figured the rest of the table was irrelevant at that point, or thats how I interpreted what you said.  Also, I thought the 95% at low rpms was what I wanted.   Am I wrong in thinking that at 95% the N75 is pretty much blocking the signal?  Then, at higher rpms the duty cycle should loosen up to stabilize the boost? 


 I guess this is the reason why I just went MBC last time I was trying to dial in my car.  This time I would really like to figure this out.

Logged
marcellus
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +2/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 472


« Reply #177 on: May 03, 2012, 10:10:51 PM »

FWIW, I wasnt trying to deviate to far from my base tune and the few tunes I have been looking through:

Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #178 on: May 03, 2012, 10:12:57 PM »

Also, I thought the 95% at low rpms was what I wanted.

At low rpms the PID should be sending 95% already to the INPUT of that table.

Quote
 Am I wrong in thinking that at 95% the N75 is pretty much blocking the signal?  Then, at higher rpms the duty cycle should loosen up to stabilize the boost?

Yes.

Look, before you do ANYTHING to that table, do you understand what the two inputs to that table are?

One is RPM. The other... what do you think it is?
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #179 on: May 03, 2012, 10:13:30 PM »

That linearization table is a mess.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 16
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.032 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)