Pages: [1]
Author Topic: stage 1 info  (Read 6448 times)
aaronritchie
Full Member
***

Karma: +3/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 90


« on: March 01, 2013, 11:03:24 AM »

after reading different views on a stage 1 tune for a bam engine , is it true that KMFRIL AND KMFIOP dont need to be touched if i dont want any more than 1.2 bar of boost . I can just cap load using LDRXN and give some extra fuel using KFBLTS  ?  Thanks
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +605/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12243


WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2013, 11:07:16 AM »

Why not look at KFMIRL and see?
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
Gonzo
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +21/-30
Offline Offline

Posts: 483


« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2013, 11:15:02 AM »

KFMIRL is fine alone. KFMIOP might need modding if you run into tq monitroing issues.

Give it a shot and find out.
Logged
aaronritchie
Full Member
***

Karma: +3/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 90


« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2013, 11:20:50 AM »

Why not look at KFMIRL and see?

It look possible if i cap LRDXN at 180 
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +605/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12243


WWW
« Reply #4 on: March 01, 2013, 11:48:47 AM »

Yup. looks fine to me.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +640/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2013, 12:02:02 PM »

capping ldrxn @ 180 will yield roughly 1.1bar boost.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
aaronritchie
Full Member
***

Karma: +3/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 90


« Reply #6 on: March 01, 2013, 12:55:45 PM »

capping ldrxn @ 180 will yield roughly 1.1bar boost.

would capping it at 185  or 190 be better.  Also i have altered KFBLTS TO ADD EXTRA FUEL and TAGBTS   and LAMFA is set to 0.828 at WOT for pre enrichment .  Would stock timing be safe to use ? Of course i will do all usual logs to check egt , cf etc.
Logged
Gonzo
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +21/-30
Offline Offline

Posts: 483


« Reply #7 on: March 01, 2013, 01:31:15 PM »

would capping it at 185  or 190 be better.  Also i have altered KFBLTS TO ADD EXTRA FUEL and TAGBTS   and LAMFA is set to 0.828 at WOT for pre enrichment .  Would stock timing be safe to use ? Of course i will do all usual logs to check egt , cf etc.
Try it and find out Smiley
Logged
littco
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +52/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 903


« Reply #8 on: March 01, 2013, 01:53:50 PM »

would capping it at 185  or 190 be better.  Also i have altered KFBLTS TO ADD EXTRA FUEL and TAGBTS   and LAMFA is set to 0.828 at WOT for pre enrichment .  Would stock timing be safe to use ? Of course i will do all usual logs to check egt , cf etc.

As the others say try it. But what I will say is reducing the timing down 1-2 degrees at high loads and rpms will decrease the cf's from around 6-8 down to 3ish..
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.099 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)