ericpaulyoung
Full Member
Karma: +5/-0
 Offline
Posts: 149
|
 |
« Reply #75 on: February 20, 2015, 08:51:18 AM »
|
|
|
Specifically. The voltage or frequency at which a given mass flux is measured is less for a larger MAF such that the max voltage or frequency would represent a higher mass flux value.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
vwaudiguy
|
|
« Reply #76 on: February 20, 2015, 09:58:28 AM »
|
|
|
But the airflow hasn't increased?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
|
|
|
ericpaulyoung
Full Member
Karma: +5/-0
Offline
Posts: 149
|
|
« Reply #77 on: February 20, 2015, 10:07:22 AM »
|
|
|
Yes it has. I maxed out the smaller MAF. So I installed a bigger one so that the sensor is no longer out of range. But they both max out at exactly the same mass air flow value enemy as I continue to accelerate as the rpm's increase. Then the fueling goes lean because the mass air flow is increasing but the MAF is not measuring it. So the car adds too little fuel.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
maZer.GTi
Full Member
Karma: +68/-6
Offline
Posts: 246
|
|
« Reply #78 on: February 24, 2015, 07:30:39 PM »
|
|
|
Sensor value absolute maximums are 364.08 on VAGCOM and 499 on ECUx.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ericpaulyoung
Full Member
Karma: +5/-0
Offline
Posts: 149
|
|
« Reply #79 on: February 25, 2015, 04:23:16 PM »
|
|
|
That is interesting. So it is just the logging tool which is maxing out. Funny thing is I was using my Maestro cable for my "vag com logging" and it maxed at 363.76. I thought it was the same as a vag com cable when if came to logs. But as you indicate, as soon as I switched to my actual Vag Com cable, the max value I top out as is now 364.08. Wtf? I guess Maestro cannot be used as a log cable without caveats.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ericpaulyoung
Full Member
Karma: +5/-0
Offline
Posts: 149
|
|
« Reply #80 on: February 25, 2015, 04:36:30 PM »
|
|
|
Can I change these maximums ?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #81 on: February 25, 2015, 04:41:03 PM »
|
|
|
Can I change these maximums ? You'll have to run the MAF underscaled. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
ericpaulyoung
Full Member
Karma: +5/-0
Offline
Posts: 149
|
|
« Reply #82 on: February 25, 2015, 05:05:01 PM »
|
|
|
Since the maximum is only in the logger, is the ECU seeing real values? If so, what is the limit in the ECU?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
maZer.GTi
Full Member
Karma: +68/-6
Offline
Posts: 246
|
|
« Reply #83 on: February 25, 2015, 05:27:59 PM »
|
|
|
Since the maximum is only in the logger, is the ECU seeing real values? If so, what is the limit in the ECU?
Yes the Maximum is only for logging and diagnostic. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #84 on: February 25, 2015, 05:31:30 PM »
|
|
|
Since the maximum is only in the logger, is the ECU seeing real values? If so, what is the limit in the ECU?
iirc around 900 g/sec, which should be loggable by ME7L |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #85 on: February 25, 2015, 05:40:32 PM »
|
|
|
iirc around 900 g/sec, which should be loggable by ME7L
Nye: Stop thinking locally. This is a GLOBAL initiative! Not everyone is tuning ME7 bruh! haha So who's hit the hard MAF limit? I want 900g/s! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
ericpaulyoung
Full Member
Karma: +5/-0
Offline
Posts: 149
|
|
« Reply #86 on: February 25, 2015, 07:35:17 PM »
|
|
|
So is the ECU seeing the correct info? Or is there a cap in the ECU also?
EPY
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yosh
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 22
|
|
« Reply #87 on: April 26, 2015, 02:12:18 AM »
|
|
|
Data acquisition package like INCA would log well beyond the range of VCDS and such tools. But cost puts it beyond the reach of most people  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
59eurobug
Newbie
Karma: +0/-1
Offline
Posts: 10
|
|
« Reply #88 on: August 28, 2016, 10:27:02 PM »
|
|
|
I'm using this tool to learn how to scale my maf when I decide to upgrade my turbos/or go STK. I keep getting 2 errors with the file. I've done it both ways with and without the offset. What am I doing wrong? File is the community stage 2 file which I renamed ONLY for maf scaling purposes(I'm too lazy to type the whole thing in cmd)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TijnCU
Hero Member
Karma: +60/-4
Offline
Posts: 690
flying brick
|
|
« Reply #89 on: September 02, 2016, 05:02:27 AM »
|
|
|
Did you correct the checksums after the mod?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
