Could of fried it with high EGT's I guess.

What conclusions are you drawing here? 

Have you seen this?

https://www.rbracing-rsr.com/downloads/wiring_pdfs/bosch_lsu49.pdf

edit:  EGT's will come down with fuel and load reduced?

I wrote that then though of my second paragraph..

You'll be adding fuel, timing, etc, if ATR kicks in it will dump fuel to lamlim

quick look @ FR for VAG MED9 it's the tans error path?

Has anyone logged taikr_w on their TFSI?
I would love to have a comparison against other setup.

My taikr_w reads almost exactly the same as KFATMKRH indicates.
I would have assumed the ECU would base it´s calculations on the temperature info from the front lambda, but I don´t think thats the case in reality.
To me it seems like it is applying reduction factors over the table values from "ATM", based on mixture, load and ignition.

Found out the issue which caused the rlmax_w being scaled down.
It was something extremely simple, but still something extremely hard to find.
I had to look all of my modified maps through for several times and still only found the issue by an accident

Every map which can modify rlmax_w and uses fak_uw_b1 (1.52587890625e-5) or fak_uw_b2 (3.0517578125e-5) is affected.
The issue gets amplified if you have multiple corrections (pull-back & IAT) active and you have altered the default values, like I have.
If you disable the corrections at a given point by setting the value to 1.000000 the actual value the ECU will see will be different due WinOls.
fak_uw_b2 for example will be rounded from 0.000030517578125 to 0.000031 automatically. This means that for every correction which gets activated, your actual load will yield 0.9844 correction instead of 1.0.
Setting each cell to be modified to 1.000000 will result in 0.9844 correction, whereas setting them to 1.015808 results in 1.0000 correction.

Yeah.

1 / 65536 = 0.0000152587890625 (fak_uw_b1)
2 / 65536 = 0.000030517578125 (fak_uw_b2)

In WinOls (factor set to 0.000031 and precision to 6) 1.000029 yields 0x7E03 in hex.
32259 * 0.000030517578125 = 0.984466552734375

How does one log the variables in MED9? I thought they were just for ME7Logger?

Is KFPLGUB supposed to have boost values, which the turbo is able to reach with 0% waste gate duty?
That appears to be the case, but I cannot see how KFDPLGU map correlates with it.

Need to log fho_w and pssol_w, but am I even on the right tracks?

The actuators on K03-105 & K04-064 turbos starts to move at the same pressure (300mbar), however K03-105 requires less pressure to open fully and generally has higher "lift" than K04-064.

K03-105 & K04-064 actuator specs in case someone needs them:

K03-105:

Minimum pressure: 300mbar (starts to move)
Maximum pressure rating: 700mbar
Maximum travel: 10mm
Calibration settings: 345 - 355mbar = 4.1 - 4.3mm travel

K04-064

Minimum pressure: 300mbar (starts to move)
Maximum pressure rating: 800mbar
Maximum travel: 13mm
Calibration settings: 495 - 505mbar = 4 - 4.25mm travel

The travel is measured from the wastegate flap arm mechanism, not from the actuator rod itself.