Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 40
Author Topic: Anti-lag launch and no-lift-shift secrets inside  (Read 482231 times)
Jason
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +38/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 500


Breaks everything!


« Reply #75 on: May 18, 2011, 09:07:29 PM »

Oh hell yeah!  Do you have any threads documenting your build?
Logged
DJGonzo
Guest
« Reply #76 on: May 18, 2011, 09:07:41 PM »



 Tongue
Logged
judeisnotobscure
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +38/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 379


« Reply #77 on: May 18, 2011, 09:18:08 PM »

 Grin Grin Grin Grin and  Shocked
Logged

I have a b5 s4
but i just want to dance.
Jason
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +38/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 500


Breaks everything!


« Reply #78 on: May 18, 2011, 09:51:14 PM »

 Grin

Back on topic.  I have merged setzi62's latest code with Tony's Stage 3 base tune if anybody is interested:

http://www.nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php/topic,636.new.html#new

Note - I have not test this file yet.
Logged
ElementalVoid
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +9/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 43


« Reply #79 on: May 18, 2011, 10:03:53 PM »

To be honest, I think the amount of boost is irrelevant as that incident occurred with no boost.

If you're going to launch, prepare to buy spare parts.

Don't launch your daily driver unless you have a spare car and AAA.

Absolutely understood. Of course things can always go wrong no matter how careful you are and I'm okay with that. And you've provided some solid advice (julex too) which I appreciate as I'm sure others here do too. The only reason I haven't sold my extra vehicle is because my S4 is a toy and so I plan on it being out of service every now and then. That being said, if it were possible to reduce the boost then I'd feel much safer actually using this because the stress on the system should be drastically reduced. If it were a setting that could be changed (like a variable to define the ignition delay) to alter how much of any single combustion event was used to rotate the motor vs the amount of energy used to spool the turbo I think that would be fantastic. I just don't know if that is plausible to do.
Logged
Jason
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +38/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 500


Breaks everything!


« Reply #80 on: May 18, 2011, 10:31:09 PM »

What I would try in your case is the other launch control discussed here using stock limiters:

http://www.nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php/topic,151.0.html

It doesn't build boost like this method does and still holds your preset launch RPM.
Logged
Rick
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +62/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 704


« Reply #81 on: May 19, 2011, 02:48:39 AM »

Update,

car wouldn't start this morning!  No communication from the ECU either, had to put my spare ECU in.

I used WinOLS to patch the code in so checksum should be ok.  Dnly started once last night when testing - should know better than that!

Rick
Logged
robin
Full Member
***

Karma: +20/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 139


« Reply #82 on: May 19, 2011, 06:12:32 AM »

If the changes are outside of WinOLS's checksum ranges, it won't monitor or correct them.
Logged
DJGonzo
Guest
« Reply #83 on: May 19, 2011, 06:15:17 AM »

I doubt this is the case, and if it is, I can checksum and files that need to be checksum with a different tool if anybody needs me to  Wink

Its not ECUFix or any TunerPro plugin  Tongue
Logged
julex
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +78/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 923


« Reply #84 on: May 19, 2011, 06:52:34 AM »

I doubt this is the case, and if it is, I can checksum and files that need to be checksum with a different tool if anybody needs me to  Wink

Its not ECUFix or any TunerPro plugin  Tongue

I modified the bin in hex editor and opened/saved in TunerPro with MTX checksum plugin. Works on my car just fine. I suspect something went wrong with the porting of code on your end as otherwise I just can't see how it would not communicate at all.
Logged
DJGonzo
Guest
« Reply #85 on: May 19, 2011, 06:55:21 AM »

I wasn't the one with the issue  Tongue

Im still waiting for this to get ported to 1.8T / VR6 since all my attempts have been futile
« Last Edit: May 19, 2011, 06:57:27 AM by Gonzo » Logged
julex
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +78/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 923


« Reply #86 on: May 19, 2011, 07:20:12 AM »

Oh hell yeah!  Do you have any threads documenting your build?

/Threadjack start:

No, but a teaser.

Ported stock manifold to match 2.8heads. 15k rpm grinder and carbide bit is fun!:


2.8 heads WIP with full ferrea valvetrain installed (shiny!):


/Threadjack end

Logged
prj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +903/-420
Offline Offline

Posts: 5787


« Reply #87 on: May 19, 2011, 08:10:31 AM »

With no EGT based shutdown or time based shutdown, you will blow stuff up fast.
If you do not have a decat, you will instamelt your cats.
Good flatfoot shift for drag needs to know gearbox ratio, and revmatch for you.

Good job to chris though.
I have written such stuff myself, but for a little bit older Motronic and know how difficult it is to find everything...
Logged

PM's will not be answered, so don't even try.
Log your car properly.
Tony@NefMoto
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +130/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 1389


2001.5 Audi S4 Stage 3


« Reply #88 on: May 19, 2011, 12:32:40 PM »

I split out Setzis post on how to patch in code changes into a separate thread:
http://www.nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php/topic,641.0.html
Logged

Remember you have to log in if you want to see the file attachments!
Info or questions, please add to the wiki: http://www.nefariousmotorsports.com/wiki
Follow NefMoto developments on Twitter: http://twitter.com/nefmoto
DJGonzo
Guest
« Reply #89 on: May 19, 2011, 12:52:32 PM »

I split out Setzis post on how to patch in code changes into a separate thread:
http://www.nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php/topic,641.0.html
Good thinking  Smiley
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 40
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.025 seconds with 18 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)