|
thelastleroy
|
 |
« Reply #135 on: October 16, 2014, 06:50:32 PM »
|
|
|
I played around with the tables a bit, I'm going to run this tomorrow. Logs to follow.
-lamfa smoothed out, good and rich at 90% to ramp up, and very rich at WOT to redline.
-ldrxn tapered down slightly after 5k (I'm only logging to just over 6k and small turbo)
-zklamfaw_0_A table modified to 80%
whatcha think?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SB_GLI
|
|
« Reply #136 on: October 16, 2014, 08:48:35 PM »
|
|
|
I would increase the 1000 rpm row in the last two columns to something like .95, but otherwise looks good to me. Log it!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thelastleroy
|
|
« Reply #137 on: October 17, 2014, 04:24:33 AM »
|
|
|
Log:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SB_GLI
|
|
« Reply #138 on: October 17, 2014, 04:55:22 AM »
|
|
|
Log:
Horray! I think we finally have LAMFA doing what we want it to do. I still suggest that you modify the 1000 rpm row of lamfa to be something like .95. Too rich too soon. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #139 on: October 17, 2014, 05:02:43 AM »
|
|
|
Horray! I think we finally have LAMFA doing what we want it to do. I still suggest that you modify the 1000 rpm row of lamfa to be something like .95. Too rich too soon.
Richening when you look at the throttle is not what you want it to do. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
|
SB_GLI
|
|
« Reply #140 on: October 17, 2014, 05:45:40 AM »
|
|
|
What my fine friend here is trying to say is that we need to bring in LAMFA more smoothly.
Let's modify the LAMFA RPM axis to include a 2000 rpm row so we can better control the request during spool.
Then, let's use these values
1000, 1
2000, .84
3000, .82
.....
6500, .82
Then, we should raise TABGBTS (threshold for BTS enrichment) to 1000 and I think our fueling will be close to done.
I can get TABGBTS in the xdf if it is not already.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #141 on: October 17, 2014, 09:12:21 AM »
|
|
|
I'd also maybe bump ZK back up a *touch*... filtering isn't bad considering how bad the resolution of LAMFA is.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
A4Rich
Full Member
Karma: +10/-0
 Offline
Posts: 116
|
|
« Reply #142 on: October 17, 2014, 12:33:34 PM »
|
|
|
I can get TABGBTS in the xdf if it is not already.
I think i have it defined correctly but verification would be nice. TABGBTS - 849.99 (Stock Bin) - 26EB2 16bit LSB First (conversion of 0.019531*X-50) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thelastleroy
|
|
« Reply #143 on: October 17, 2014, 05:07:32 PM »
|
|
|
I made some minor adjustments, including the lamfa column change (add 2000rpm row) and some ramp-up in the top of the lamfa table, and zklamfaw_0_A set to 60% across the board.
Log, table picture, and bin file
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thelastleroy
|
|
« Reply #144 on: October 17, 2014, 05:16:29 PM »
|
|
|
I think i have it defined correctly but verification would be nice.
TABGBTS - 849.99 (Stock Bin) - 26EB2 16bit LSB First (conversion of 0.019531*X-50)
Nice! Can anyone confirm this location?  Then, we should raise TABGBTS (threshold for BTS enrichment) to 1000 and I think our fueling will be close to done.
I can get TABGBTS in the xdf if it is not already.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #145 on: October 17, 2014, 05:22:17 PM »
|
|
|
I made some minor adjustments, including the lamfa column change (add 2000rpm row) and some ramp-up in the top of the lamfa table, and zklamfaw_0_A set to 60% across the board.
Log, table picture, and bin file
60% is still to much... LAMFA is still lumpy Also LAMFA isn't exactly smooth.. thats a weird dropoff you got going there.. Finally, BTS still triggering |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #146 on: October 17, 2014, 05:26:36 PM »
|
|
|
want something like this
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
|
thelastleroy
|
|
« Reply #147 on: October 17, 2014, 08:20:10 PM »
|
|
|
want something like this
I modified the lamfa table to hopefully get closer to your suggestion Log: |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 17, 2014, 09:34:55 PM by thelastleroy »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #148 on: October 17, 2014, 10:11:32 PM »
|
|
|
uh
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
|
thelastleroy
|
|
« Reply #149 on: October 18, 2014, 05:42:04 AM »
|
|
|
oops. back to the drawing board.  -I ditched the 90% adjustments for now, they're back to stock 14.7 -Completely re-arranged Lamfa's rpm axis values for more adjustment between 1k and 3500 (where I need it) -Finally, adjusted the last column lamfa values while looking at the graph Here's a shot of the new lamfa profile Log later today hopefully |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 18, 2014, 06:08:59 AM by thelastleroy »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
