NefMoto > Technical > Tuning > Community Projects > Nefmoto community project: Stage1 1.8t ME7.5 A4 (8E0909518AK-0003)
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 52
« previous next »
Author Topic: Nefmoto community project: Stage1 1.8t ME7.5 A4 (8E0909518AK-0003)  (Read 570781 times)
Fadelight
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 3
« Reply #270 on: November 23, 2014, 08:21:22 AM »
Will they work with an AWM engine?

Logged
thelastleroy
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +19/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 260
« Reply #271 on: November 23, 2014, 09:07:57 AM »
Quote from: Fadelight on November 23, 2014, 08:21:22 AM
Will they work with an AWM engine?
Post your bin and someone may be able to tell you
Logged
Fadelight
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 3
« Reply #272 on: November 23, 2014, 10:12:29 AM »
Here it is.
Logged
MadCow
Full Member
***

Karma: +3/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 108
« Reply #273 on: November 23, 2014, 11:20:28 AM »
I've been wanting to know this too. Apart from the returnless fuel system, are there any significant differences between B6 and B5 ME7.5?
Logged
thelastleroy
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +19/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 260
« Reply #274 on: November 23, 2014, 07:43:04 PM »
Quote from: Fadelight on November 23, 2014, 10:12:29 AM
Here it is.

This is the ID for your file. I don't personally know if the 518AK file can be cross-flashed, but someone might....

==============================================================================
ME7Check v1.12 (c) mki, 06/2004-05/2012
Checking file C:\Users\Pc\Desktop\Tuning\bins\Modified_Files\AWM_Stock.bin (size
=1048576)
Reading Version Strings...
-> Bootrom Version = 05.12
-> EPK = 40/1/ME7.5/5/4012.01//24b/Dst01o/110700//
-> Contents of ECUID data table:
   - '0261207216'         (SSECUHN)
   - '1037360101'         (SSECUSN)
   - '4B0906018CH '       (VAG part number)
   - '0001'               (VAG sw number)
   - '1.8L R4/5VT     '   (engine id)
-> Contents of ECUID data table:
   - 'HW_MAN004'

-> No errors found. File is OK.   *********************

Press any key to continue . . .
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640
« Reply #275 on: November 23, 2014, 08:31:33 PM »
018CH and 518AK are not compatible.
Logged
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
A4Rich
Full Member
***

Karma: +10/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 116
« Reply #276 on: November 23, 2014, 09:50:31 PM »
Am working on updating coil dwell to match the 2.0t coils that I have been using for the past several years.  I located the appropriate 518AK 004 (wrong version... will update with 003) maps (FTSDRLW, FSWTM, KFSZDUB, KFTSRL) based on this thread, click.  Still working on verifying the appropriate values.
« Last Edit: November 23, 2014, 10:03:18 PM by A4Rich » Logged
thelastleroy
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +19/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 260
« Reply #277 on: November 24, 2014, 04:30:08 AM »
I'm still getting weird resilts from modifying KMFIRL/KMFIOP. The performance is increased but I'm getting what I can only assume is torque intervention.  On WOT Car pulls like hell and then *sometimes* feels like a wheel is spinning, which is not the case. The rpm remains the same but the car stops accelerating.  Then power comes on again and it pulls fine right to redline. I'm going to try and catch it on a log today and log the torque intervention variables to see if that's whats going on
Logged
KmosK04
Full Member
***

Karma: +5/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 97
« Reply #278 on: November 24, 2014, 06:17:13 AM »
As I'm having the same problem with IRL/IOP can somebody give a clear explanation how to tune those 2 maps and how to log and understand if is everything working fine?
Logged
littco
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +52/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 903
« Reply #279 on: November 24, 2014, 10:43:00 AM »
Quote from: thelastleroy on November 24, 2014, 04:30:08 AM
I'm still getting weird resilts from modifying KMFIRL/KMFIOP. The performance is increased but I'm getting what I can only assume is torque intervention.  On WOT Car pulls like hell and then *sometimes* feels like a wheel is spinning, which is not the case. The rpm remains the same but the car stops accelerating.  Then power comes on again and it pulls fine right to redline. I'm going to try and catch it on a log today and log the torque intervention variables to see if that's whats going on

Log timing and you'll probably see massive timing swings.

some people say with proper iml/iop you wont get torque intervention which is very true.

I say just ditch it, turn off the TI and never worry about it again..
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #280 on: November 24, 2014, 10:46:14 AM »
Quote from: littco on November 24, 2014, 10:43:00 AM
Log timing and you'll probably see massive timing swings.

some people say with proper iml/iop you wont get torque intervention which is very true.

IMO easiest way to fix irl/iop is to shift everything but the first 3 columns (load) down a column (deleting column 3), including load axis values, and adding a last column for the highest load req in irl (or ldrxn) and setting it to 99. I'll try to get a screen shot time permitting.

You can use also the IOP calculator, but i would not touch anything in the stock values below say 50% load.

Quote
I say just ditch it, turn off the TI and never worry about it again..

Generally not a good idea, you'll just get level 2 torque intervention.
« Last Edit: November 24, 2014, 06:23:24 PM by nyet » Logged
ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
littco
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +52/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 903
« Reply #281 on: November 24, 2014, 11:17:08 AM »
Quote from: nyet on November 24, 2014, 10:46:14 AM
IMO easiest way to fix irl/iop is to shift everything but the first 3 columns (load) down a column (deleting column 3), including load axis values, and adding a last column for the highest load req in irl and setting it to 99. I'll try to get a screen shot time permitting.

You can use also the IOP calculator, but i would not touch anything in the stock values below say 50% load.

Generally not a good idea, you'll just get level 2 torque intervention.

I was kind of suggesting, modify mil/iop for the increase in load and turn of TI as well, that way you shouldn't get TI or level 2.. 
Logged
thelastleroy
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +19/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 260
« Reply #282 on: November 24, 2014, 03:40:39 PM »
I made some adjustments to LAMFA today and drove the piss out of my car trying to catch the bog I was experiencing on a log. It didn't come back. I made the fueling come on a little later, kind of a softer ramp from 1 to .84. Is it possible that with the new higher boost request I was simply flooding the engine during spool? Would this cause a bog spot at what should be peak boost?

I'll post a log of my current flash when I get home
« Last Edit: November 24, 2014, 06:48:23 PM by thelastleroy » Logged
thelastleroy
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +19/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 260
« Reply #283 on: November 24, 2014, 06:16:56 PM »
And here's the log.

Not sure if I like how the "italian job" feels on my car. I had to pull out all the timing to avoid corrections and while there is more boost, the throttle response has suffered a bit.

I'm going to work out nyet's suggestion and see how that feels. I'm starting to wonder if I should buy a project car ie s4 Wink so I don't blow up my daily. I've got the bug, boys.

nyet: I don't have the KMFIRL axis' defined to alter the load values per your suggestion, could someone help me set this up?
« Last Edit: November 24, 2014, 06:47:30 PM by thelastleroy » Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640
« Reply #284 on: November 24, 2014, 08:00:21 PM »
You can't just multiply the entire table by 15 percent. If you feel it's limiting you, increase the last 2 rows, then rescale IOP to suit.
Logged
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 52
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Navigation
Personal Tools
  • November 25, 2024, 09:22:24 AM
  • Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
    Did you miss your activation email?

    Login with username, password and session length
Search
 
Advanced Search
About Disclaimer
All Rights Reserved 2010 Nefarious Motosports
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.057 seconds with 18 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)