MadCow
Full Member
Karma: +2/-1
 Offline
Posts: 108
|
 |
« Reply #420 on: January 06, 2015, 06:12:17 PM »
|
|
|
Why not use the TT225 KFZWOP maps? The load axis is changed in the TT225 KFMIOP so my assumption is you need the KFZWOP maps to match too, right? That's what I'm running at the moment, no logs yet though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thelastleroy
|
|
« Reply #421 on: January 06, 2015, 06:30:23 PM »
|
|
|
Why not use the TT225 KFZWOP maps? The load axis is changed in the TT225 KFMIOP so my assumption is you need the KFZWOP maps to match too, right? That's what I'm running at the moment, no logs yet though.
Not sure they need to match. Like phila said, "There is nothing to gain from this table. It is strictly used for interventions". I guess if I'm using the stock TT225 IOP/IRL there is no reason the stock TT225 KFZWOP values wouldn't work. I'm just thinking there wouldn't be any appreciable difference. Might just try it anyways, for curiosity's sake. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BlkSerialKilla
Full Member
Karma: +18/-0
Offline
Posts: 106
That's Just The Nature Of The Beast...
|
|
« Reply #422 on: January 11, 2015, 04:18:57 PM »
|
|
|
In regards to KFDMDARO,KFDMDADP, & KFDMDAROS I took a stab at locating it in SW 0003. I believe these maps although weird appearing are them in actuality. I had just recently 0xFF'ed all bins in those areas for the tables I defined and car is now jerky upon rapid acceleration +/-. If anyone that can put the correct names to each table variant that would be neat.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jonamond
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 82
|
|
« Reply #423 on: January 12, 2015, 05:51:16 PM »
|
|
|
Got this file working successfully! I did try to implement the antilag/nls features on this file but I ended up with a no start.... Is it possible we can figure out how to add this on?
Thanks Jon
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #424 on: January 12, 2015, 06:16:57 PM »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thelastleroy
|
|
« Reply #425 on: January 12, 2015, 06:18:31 PM »
|
|
|
Got this file working successfully! I did try to implement the antilag/nls features on this file but I ended up with a no start.... Is it possible we can figure out how to add this on?
Thanks Jon
Glad to see you got the file up and running. I wish you luck with the NLS and antilag, but I believe in the interest of keeping this thread about tuning, we will not be adding custom code to the community file. Second on the agenda; double post. You already have a thread started with exactly what you ard trying to achieve describe in great detail. You have two experts posting In that thread today to help you within a few hours of asking for help. I understand your excitement, doing this for the first time is like magic. Powerful feeling. Just slow down a bit and try some things out. Come back and check your thread. If nobody answers in a few days, THEN politely bump your thread. Double posting is basically spamming the boards. Other than that, welcome to.the community file team! How 'bout some logs fella? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jonamond
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 82
|
|
« Reply #426 on: January 12, 2015, 06:23:03 PM »
|
|
|
 sorry just anxious don't mean to be such a bother. I will get some logs going as soon as I refill with 94 Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thelastleroy
|
|
« Reply #427 on: January 12, 2015, 06:27:52 PM »
|
|
|
sorry just anxious don't mean to be such a bother. I will get some logs going as soon as I refill with 94 Thanks Its no bother. Just having another internet rant on a monday. Have you driven the car much yet? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jonamond
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 82
|
|
« Reply #428 on: January 12, 2015, 07:37:32 PM »
|
|
|
Its no bother. Just having another internet rant on a monday. Have you driven the car much yet?
I drove home from work. Im going easy for now until the remaining 87 Oct is gone and I can refill with 94. I did give it a go, it is smooth, but did you notice a feelable power increase.. im not sure what to expect, im wondering if the previous owner already had it tuned and never told me |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thelastleroy
|
|
« Reply #429 on: January 12, 2015, 08:20:15 PM »
|
|
|
I drove home from work. Im going easy for now until the remaining 87 Oct is gone and I can refill with 94. I did give it a go, it is smooth, but did you notice a feelable power increase.. im not sure what to expect, im wondering if the previous owner already had it tuned and never told me
If you've got 87 in there now, your ECU is likely pulling timing to stop the knock. The file doesn't have tons of advance compared to stock, but enough to make a difference. There is more boost, and it's all right away because k03 turbo. I think you'll like it when you have the 94 in there. Might want to clear the engine codes (even if you don't have any) when you fill up to zero the fuel adaptations. If your previous file was tuned, you should be able to tell by comparing to the "stock" file on page 1. What software version is your original file? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jonamond
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 82
|
|
« Reply #430 on: January 12, 2015, 08:24:16 PM »
|
|
|
If you've got 87 in there now, your ECU is likely pulling timing to stop the knock. The file doesn't have tons of advance compared to stock, but enough to make a difference. There is more boost, and it's all right away because k03 turbo. I think you'll like it when you have the 94 in there. Might want to clear the engine codes (even if you don't have any) when you fill up to zero the fuel adaptations.
If your previous file was tuned, you should be able to tell by comparing to the "stock" file on page 1. What software version is your original file?
I did notice it seems to pull a little better on the hwy in the mid range 0003 |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 12, 2015, 08:26:10 PM by Jonamond »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thelastleroy
|
|
« Reply #431 on: January 12, 2015, 08:26:30 PM »
|
|
|
0003
Standard transmission? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jonamond
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 82
|
|
« Reply #432 on: January 12, 2015, 08:28:11 PM »
|
|
|
Standard transmission?
yes |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thelastleroy
|
|
« Reply #433 on: January 12, 2015, 08:31:15 PM »
|
|
|
Perfect. This is the comparison I've been waiting for!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jonamond
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 82
|
|
« Reply #434 on: January 12, 2015, 08:35:26 PM »
|
|
|
Perfect. This is the comparison I've been waiting for!
lol Im also constantly in oakville My buddy just bought a 05 wagon 6spd 1.8t. Going to dig into that very soon also |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 12, 2015, 08:37:02 PM by Jonamond »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
