Agreed. Note that there is pretty much zero reason to alter timing in non-knock limited areas

I was able to just move a row down one to make room for another one.

Thanks all,

I generally use time on the Y - axis as I have to use public roads for testing and it's easier to locate the relevant information using time as the Y - axis (trying to find a clear suitable road in the south east of England can take a while).

I I've worked it out (load flat lining at 191), I need to increase the load axis values on the KFMIOP & KFZWOP.

Questions (hopefully not dumb one's)

There are 11 values for the load axis on the KFMIOP & KFZWOP, I know how to change these 11 values, but is it possible to add values or is it a fixed limit of 11 values (pretty sure it's fixed, but would like someone to confirm)?

You cant add axis values only rescale them. I used KFMIRL / me7tuner wizard to generate me a kfmirl map and kfmiop along with kfzwop because na soft is way different and it would take me ages to rewrite the maps completely with logging, but it also doenst matter that much since i got dbc mode enabled and so Its to get my timing and kfped request tuned to get lamfa fueling over boost dialied in.


The f23 is most definitely a stock rod bender, it doesnt really matter if you limit lower rpm spool/timing because it will bend /break anyway after a while.I dont know what would be safe timings for that turbo , maybe 10-15 degree 3000-5000 and 15+ at wot or something.

The problem with it its that its torque peak is way to early for stock rods.

Does anyone have any experience using the ME7 Tuner Wizard, IE can it be relied upon?

I'm running a F23 Turbo, would I choose big or small turbo in the ME7 Tuner Wizard?

Blazius talks about lowering the timing for safety if running a hybrid Turbo;

- Safety in what respect?
- When might this be appropriate? (answer to the first one will probably answer this)
- Roughly where & by how much might the timing require changing?

Thanks again

I'm getting there

Thanks,

I've used the Wizard to generate the attached maps for 2.5Bar and set KFLDHBN to 2.55 across the board.

If someone could take a look at the attached sheet to see if it looks as expected, it would be most appreciated. (not expecting anyone to analyse it, just see if there is anything glaringly obviously wrong)

The points that I'm concerned about are;

- KFMIOP, there are a lot of 100% entries
- The KFZWOP & KFZWOP2 as I fried 4 coils previously by changing the timing (could have been rubbish coils though)

How are you going to run 2.5bar? Stock map cant measure that. All the 100% areas are for boost loads, and since its not a ko3 , you dont taper load/boost thats why you always have 100% torque there.

I want to avoid breaking the car as I've only recently finished the mechanical build.

Thanks

Doesn't the stock ecu\MAP sensor top out at 2550 mbar?

Thought that might be the case, I was pondering it while cycling this evening. The KFMIRL & KFMIOP numbers did look high that's why I was asking for the advice.

I'll re-do the maps tomorrow.

Thanks for replying.