Mladen
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
 Offline
Posts: 50
|
 |
« Reply #1140 on: January 14, 2019, 07:38:45 AM »
|
|
|
Any idea if we can flash over OBD2 with this? I tried reading the website but its not clear. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
wwm9502
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 3
|
|
« Reply #1141 on: January 17, 2019, 09:06:20 AM »
|
|
|
Any idea if we can flash over OBD2 with this?
I tried reading the website but its not clear.
If you want to flash via OBDII, you may try I/O Terminal. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bignslow
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 15
|
|
« Reply #1142 on: February 01, 2019, 05:03:25 PM »
|
|
|
Has anyone used Nefmoto software and VAG KKL cable with Volvo ECU? My MPPS crapped out so I got one of these but can't get the Nefmoto to see it in Boot Mode.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #1143 on: February 01, 2019, 05:06:08 PM »
|
|
|
Has anyone used Nefmoto software and VAG KKL cable with Volvo ECU? My MPPS crapped out so I got one of these but can't get the Nefmoto to see it in Boot Mode.
https://s4wiki.com/wiki/Tuning#Flashing_utilitiesThe Nefmoto Free ECU Flashing Software and an eBay USB VAG KKL FTDI FT232 based cable (note that a CH340 based cable will not work). Does not rely on boot mode, but will not flash bricked ECUs because bootmode support is not complete. https://github.com/NefMoto/NefMotoOpenSource/issues/6 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mach1
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 13
|
|
« Reply #1144 on: February 01, 2019, 08:17:40 PM »
|
|
|
If you want to flash via OBDII, you may try I/O Terminal.
Have you had any success via I/O Terminal? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bignslow
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 15
|
|
« Reply #1145 on: February 02, 2019, 08:54:33 AM »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 02, 2019, 08:56:21 AM by bignslow »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
wwm9502
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 3
|
|
« Reply #1146 on: February 18, 2019, 06:42:35 AM »
|
|
|
Have you had any success via I/O Terminal?
My friend flashed 2002 S60 2.3T5 via OBD2 successful. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grimst5
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 10
|
|
« Reply #1147 on: April 22, 2019, 11:37:26 AM »
|
|
|
Hi guys
I have b5244t5 m66 , stock HW with blue injectors and 3" decat and FMIC. With tune can make aprox 300 PS
What about 350+ ? when i change injector from R (green) and change flash maps from R then i have 300 PS. I thing this is best way to get 350 PS (remap R maps). If someone know which maps edit for stage1 R file 2005- would be great. Or have actuall damos?
any sugestions?
BR
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
daniel2345
Full Member
Karma: +11/-7
Offline
Posts: 188
|
|
« Reply #1148 on: April 22, 2019, 01:44:43 PM »
|
|
|
Engine has different bore. Knock recognition is off then, filling calculations in idle and part load will not work proper.
Intercooler is different, cam adjustment works different. Gear calculations will not work because of different gearbox.
Numerous other things i don't remember ad hoc.
Just use R flashfile will mostly not workout for you.
Use your file, put in desired mods and (have) adjust your file accordingly.
Good Luck
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grimst5
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 10
|
|
« Reply #1149 on: April 22, 2019, 03:57:36 PM »
|
|
|
Thank you for reply Daniel
This is very interesting what you wrote. gearbox m66 have different between AWD and FWD?
On test i will try start engine on R file, but i know people who drive his S60/V70 R with replacement engine from B5254T4 to B5244T5
Different beetwen 2.4 T5 and 2.5T R except FourC, brakes, design etc are only few like:
R models: green injectors, additional IC which does not change much and software.
T5 260 : blue injectors
cylinder head, Turbo Borg warner kkk24, dual VVT, intake manifold, exhaust manifold, airbox, MAF, rail with FPS, fuel control module are the same. Only engine block have 2.4L T5 with thicker sleeves
In my opinion that should work without problem, but this is only my opinion
BR
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
daniel2345
Full Member
Karma: +11/-7
Offline
Posts: 188
|
|
« Reply #1150 on: April 22, 2019, 11:54:16 PM »
|
|
|
Yes, different gearbox ratios. Cylinder head is different along with different range of cvvt. Turbo has different setting of pushrod. Maybe different spring from 05+. Needs to confirm. Different Bore is biggest concern in my opinion. Read a bit how knock filtering, window definitions and bandpass filters work. It will be obvious that to be safe some adjustments here are at least needed... Especially when ignition angles and ignition efficiency calculations are off because of wrong maps used. So knock control not working, acceleration and knock enrichment not working correct. Less charge air cooling along with boost overshoots from different turbo setting. Sounds not like "no problem" for me  With green injectors it will start. But i prefer doing it the proper way then drive around a pile of shit which only does not explode because of a lot luck  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 23, 2019, 12:24:24 AM by daniel2345 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grimst5
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 10
|
|
« Reply #1151 on: April 23, 2019, 02:16:08 AM »
|
|
|
B5244T5 (2.4 T5 260)
B5254T2 (2.5T 210)
B5254T4 (2.5T 300)
B5204T5 (2.0T 180)
2004+ with dual VVT have the same cylinder head with part number 36050243
B5244T5/B5254T4 turbo borg warner kkk24 the same performance, 4.4 psi WG adjustment
First R have different intake pipe from turbo to intercooler, R 2007- have the same plastic like B5244T5
WG is simple to check and adjustment, if DV need replacement there are some tuning parts.
Volvo does not hinder work
for years, the differences in power were only due to injectors, turbines and software and of course engine like 2.3L 2.0L 2.5L etc
2.5T R engine has problems with cylinders (83mm bore),
2.4T does not have these problems and you can do up to 380-400 HP on this engine (81mm bore)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fides
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 21
|
|
« Reply #1152 on: April 23, 2019, 02:19:03 AM »
|
|
|
Yes, different gearbox ratios. Cylinder head is different along with different range of cvvt. Turbo has different setting of pushrod. Maybe different spring from 05+. Needs to confirm. Different Bore is biggest concern in my opinion. Read a bit how knock filtering, window definitions and bandpass filters work. It will be obvious that to be safe some adjustments here are at least needed... Especially when ignition angles and ignition efficiency calculations are off because of wrong maps used. So knock control not working, acceleration and knock enrichment not working correct. Less charge air cooling along with boost overshoots from different turbo setting. Sounds not like "no problem" for me Just like Daniel 2345 are saing its easier to make a good remap for your ecu and engine then change to R, there are a lot of things you have to change to get this right and from my opinion for without any benefit. With green injectors it will start. But i prefer doing it the proper way then drive around a pile of shit which only does not explode because of a lot luck |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
contrast
Full Member
Karma: +20/-2
Offline
Posts: 215
|
|
« Reply #1153 on: April 23, 2019, 02:59:55 AM »
|
|
|
B5244T5/B5254T4 turbo borg warner kkk24 the same performance, 4.4 psi WG adjustment
4.4 psi wastegate preload is some incorrect bs. The correct preload can be seen in Vida where it explains the adjustment procedure as well as in ECM software it can be determined via certain maps. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
daniel2345
Full Member
Karma: +11/-7
Offline
Posts: 188
|
|
« Reply #1154 on: April 23, 2019, 03:15:23 AM »
|
|
|
Don't rely too much on part lists. They tend to be wrong, especially for R Parts. And, they are replacement part lists. It does not mean that those parts listed are factory installed... You can take a the R head, put it on bench, put a 2.5T or T5 head beneath and measure the hight. You will notice a difference. You will also notice different oil line sizes below CVVT modules and you will notice different parts of whole CVVT. One thing which represent this are different ignition coils. The R coils have different part number because they are higher due to higher head. Rod adjustment is different. Can be seen when choosing the correct note from Volvo. And can be seen in complete different PID application in data sets. You don't need to believe that, im just writhing what i noticed in the past almost 15 Years  And: it is useless to discuss. Different bore and impact on knocking would be a no go for me. And you can easily achieve same torque an power numbers with B5244T5 software. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 23, 2019, 03:43:13 AM by daniel2345 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
