Thanks.

Hi guys

I have b5244t5 m66 , stock HW with blue injectors and  3" decat and FMIC. With tune can make aprox 300 PS

What about 350+ ? when i change injector from R (green) and change flash maps from R then i have 300 PS. I thing this is best way to get 350 PS (remap R maps). If someone know which maps edit for stage1 R file 2005- would be great. Or have actuall damos?

any sugestions?

BR

Thank you for reply Daniel

This is very interesting what you wrote. gearbox m66 have different between AWD and FWD? 
On test i will try start engine on R file, but i know people who drive his S60/V70 R with replacement engine from B5254T4 to B5244T5

Different beetwen 2.4 T5 and 2.5T R except FourC, brakes, design etc are only few like:
R models: green injectors, additional IC which does not change much and software.
T5 260 : blue injectors

cylinder head, Turbo Borg warner kkk24, dual VVT, intake manifold, exhaust manifold, airbox, MAF, rail with FPS, fuel control module are the same. Only engine block have 2.4L  T5 with thicker sleeves

In my opinion that should work without problem, but this is only my opinion

BR

B5244T5 (2.4 T5 260)
B5254T2 (2.5T 210)
B5254T4 (2.5T 300)
B5204T5 (2.0T 180)

2004+ with dual VVT have the same cylinder head with part number 36050243

B5244T5/B5254T4 turbo borg warner kkk24 the same performance, 4.4 psi WG adjustment
First R have different intake pipe from turbo to intercooler, R 2007- have the same plastic like B5244T5
WG is simple to check and adjustment, if DV need replacement there are some tuning parts.

Volvo does not hinder work
for years, the differences in power were only due to injectors, turbines and software and of course engine like 2.3L 2.0L 2.5L etc

2.5T R engine has problems with cylinders (83mm bore),
2.4T does not have these problems and you can do up to 380-400 HP on this engine (81mm bore)

Don't rely too much on part lists. They tend to be wrong, especially for R Parts.
And, they are replacement part lists. It does not mean that those parts listed are factory installed...

You can take a the R head, put it on bench, put a 2.5T or T5 head beneath and measure the hight.
You will notice a difference. You will also notice different oil line sizes below CVVT modules and you will notice different parts of whole CVVT.

One thing which represent this are different ignition coils.
The R coils have different part number because they are higher due to higher head.



Rod adjustment is different. Can be seen when choosing the correct note from Volvo.
And can be seen in complete different PID application in data sets.




You don't need to believe that, im just writhing what i noticed in the past almost 15 Years



And: it is useless to discuss. Different bore and impact on knocking would be a no go for me.
And you can easily achieve same torque an power numbers with B5244T5 software.

Hehe, im mostly relaxed

Ok, for a late MY06 or even 07 they might have changed the T5 parts more in the direction of the R engine.
But would that make sense with a last MY of the R in 2006?

No synergies in 2007 to earn since no parallel production anymore...



Only a hint: when you have some, let's say "lack of experience" with tuning those Volvos, then using a file which might be completely decalibrated for your engine isn't a good start. In my opinion. Don't take "lack of experience" negative, i have no better words to describe it.

The whole process of logging, thinking and learning might be lead in a wrong direction by the issues you might observe.

A better way in my opinion with that situation would be to compare the files whenever it is unclear how some things has to be done and look what has been done with the R. Transfer the approach to your file and se what happens...


Good Luck with your project.

Hello

Ok guys, thank you for tips. That's right, it's safest to tune the engine on a T5 file.
If any od you have good damos/a2l for 2005+ file T5/R 
sw30771145AA 50GPHJ.a2l FWD EU  ?