wayne
Newbie
Karma: +1/-0
 Offline
Posts: 22
|
 |
« Reply #480 on: March 25, 2015, 05:52:07 PM »
|
|
|
Hi everyone,
I had a look at the tune on 1st post and I'm a bit surprised with the LDRXN map. It is higher than the BAM map at peak boost and lower than a basic AUQ after 4k rpm. Is it because you are tuning on a k03 turbo and k03s, to run more timing advance or I'm completely out ?
I'm currently tunning a stage 1 tune (safe 91US/95 europe octane) on mine and then, since I have a lot of e85 station around (85% ethanol) pushing it with exclusive e85 tune. Would this be the appropriate place to post the stage 1 e85 tune ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thelastleroy
|
|
« Reply #481 on: March 26, 2015, 03:34:26 PM »
|
|
|
The boost curve was worked out to more or less top out the k03 on a AMB engine. It tapers off to maintain proper AFR in the high rpm range. IDC was a factor.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ktm733
|
|
« Reply #482 on: March 27, 2015, 01:40:30 PM »
|
|
|
I'm with him. I did a e85 tuning and I think it would be a good informational post on it. Then again this might belong in the stage 2 post as injectors are needed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
thefullmontee
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 6
|
|
« Reply #483 on: April 07, 2015, 09:21:17 PM »
|
|
|
Are the current files on the first OP updated and correct for a stage 1 tune?
Ready to flash over?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TLS
Full Member
Karma: +1/-0
Offline
Posts: 62
|
|
« Reply #484 on: April 07, 2015, 09:41:37 PM »
|
|
|
I'm guessing that since this is supposed to be a tutorial (once cleaned up a bit) and not a hand-out, if you can't answer that question, then you probably should not flash them to your car.
Or just do it and see what happens.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
thefullmontee
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 6
|
|
« Reply #485 on: April 07, 2015, 09:45:24 PM »
|
|
|
No need to be rude, question was simple. Just wondering if all the info is put back to the OP. I was assuming so since it showed a recent update this month. Ive been reading through it all. Ty tho
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
thefullmontee
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 6
|
|
« Reply #486 on: April 07, 2015, 09:46:18 PM »
|
|
|
Im using it a guide/tutorial just as intended. I plan on contributing as much as i can as i learn also
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
seany260
Full Member
Karma: +0/-1
Offline
Posts: 119
|
|
« Reply #487 on: April 16, 2015, 11:30:53 PM »
|
|
|
Does anyone know the reason why MSLUB table in the v7 tuned file at the start of this thread has been modified from the stock file?
I'd just like to bring this to attention as I've had problems with trying to disable SAI using the most popular method of zeroing CDSLS/CWKONABG but did not work, instead I had to zero MSLUB/MSLBAS.
I've yet to test on stock values..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #488 on: April 16, 2015, 11:46:46 PM »
|
|
|
Does anyone know the reason why MSLUB table in the v7 tuned file at the start of this thread has been modified from the stock file?
I'd just like to bring this to attention as I've had problems with trying to disable SAI using the most popular method of zeroing CDSLS/CWKONABG but did not work, instead I had to zero MSLUB/MSLBAS.
I've yet to test on stock values..
If it didn't work, the addresses were wrong. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
seany260
Full Member
Karma: +0/-1
Offline
Posts: 119
|
|
« Reply #489 on: April 16, 2015, 11:52:12 PM »
|
|
|
If it didn't work, the addresses were wrong.
THIS IS WHAT I USED CDSLS -181BO- '01 TO 00' CWKONABG- 181B8 '05 TO 00' |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
seany260
Full Member
Karma: +0/-1
Offline
Posts: 119
|
|
« Reply #490 on: April 17, 2015, 12:04:43 AM »
|
|
|
Does anyone know the reason why MSLUB table in the v7 tuned file at the start of this thread has been modified from the stock file?
I'd just like to bring this to attention as I've had problems with trying to disable SAI using the most popular method of zeroing CDSLS/CWKONABG but did not work, instead I had to zero MSLUB/MSLBAS.
I've yet to test on stock values..
sorry maybe Im confusing things as usual, let me get this clear, I should not say that SAI disable did not work by zeroing CDSLS/CWKONABG as it was disabled and did not throw any DTC'S. My issue was that the cold start strategy with increased rpms stopped functioning when i used this method. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #491 on: April 26, 2015, 10:45:57 PM »
|
|
|
sorry maybe Im confusing things as usual, let me get this clear, I should not say that SAI disable did not work by zeroing CDSLS/CWKONABG as it was disabled and did not throw any DTC'S. My issue was that the cold start strategy with increased rpms stopped functioning when i used this method.
That is expected. With cwkonabg you also disabling cat |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #492 on: April 26, 2015, 10:49:20 PM »
|
|
|
That is expected. With cwkonabg you also disabling cat
Does the s4wiki entry need some work? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #493 on: April 27, 2015, 12:31:33 AM »
|
|
|
Does the s4wiki entry need some work?
If you want to preserve that whatnot, set it to 01. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
MadCow
Full Member
Karma: +3/-1
Offline
Posts: 108
|
|
« Reply #494 on: April 27, 2015, 04:26:35 PM »
|
|
|
Does anyone know the reason why MSLUB table in the v7 tuned file at the start of this thread has been modified from the stock file?
I noticed that too, the actual numbers are barely different (identical up to 2 or 3 decimal places) so my guess is they all got raise/lowered by one bit somehow. I wouldn't worry about it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
