The 0.7ms from Ev14 data sheet is only an FYI.

It doesn't mean you have to squirt at a minimum of 0.7ms all the time. Taken literally, it means: "don't use this size injector in the application where requested pulse width frequently falls under this threshold as you will get mixture for loads requiring pulse widths below this value".

TEMIN should only be used to force minimum pulse width on an on injector that can't operate reliably below a certain threshold. If you have some monstrous injectors like 2000cc that can't properly operate at say 0.50ms that might be required for proper idle but do ok at 0.70ms, then you TEMIN 0.70 and run pig rich a idle but at least you do run instead of car coughing and sputtering all over.

Have a look at what Ev14 run at a warm engine idle (AC and headlights off) to give you an idea what the real life minimum pulse width these will run at. Subtract about 10-20% for light decel situation (just before VA) and that's the value. Now, if it is 0.60ms, then you might have inconsistent mixture but the cool thing about very low loads (slightly below idle) is that they disable closed loop so who cares. So long the car idles allright with solid closed loop, you're good to go. Just zero out TEMIN if it really bothers you so much.

Having said that I run 1000cc modified EV14 on my car and I idle at stock idle just fine... My pulsewidths are 0.68 - 0.70 at idle, right at the threshold of ev14 repeatability.

Interestingly enough the min pulsewidth is also susceptible to fuel rail pressures. I don't know it is lower and raises with the rail pressure though....

Nothing since ECU recognizes that TEMIN is used and flips b_lrs1 and b_lrs2 bits to disable closed loop and associated stuff, including trim adaptation.

I never expect anything in return. I try to give more than I take and that's good enough for me.
I do expect people to be polite when they are asking about something.

As for TEMIN always remember, this is BEFORE injector offset gets applied.

The data sheet value just states minimum pulsewidth. It does not say minimum pulsewidth PLUS offset.
Food for thought.

For the EV14 550cc injector, it says 0.7 minimum on the data sheet. With a lag time of about 0.8 at 14V this is 1.5ms actual injector duration.
On the injector bench, I was able to go down a LOT lower than 1.5ms at 14V and you could see the injectors were flowing fine, although more and more linearity error came in.
But nonetheless, they did not began to act up or anything.

So from what I have seen on the bench, and from what I see in the data sheet, the 0.7ms either refers to absolute time, or it refers to a minimum time until the injectors are still linear.
But TEMIN is something completely different, as said before. So setting TEMIN to that value makes no sense whatsoever, as the injector will still be perfectly fine delivering a measurable amount of fuel repeatedly at 0.5ms and below TE. And if correction is needed it can be corrected via FKKVS.

As I said before, TEMIN for me is the minimum effective injection time where the amount of fuel injected is still deterministic.

I would say injector specs are not the be-all end-all.
Especially on custom modified injectors.

I think on EV14's you can quite safely set TEMIN to 0 with no ill effects, as injector cutoff will be reached even on 1000cc injectors before this becomes a problem.
Make no mistake, I am not saying this is the right thing to do. I just think TEMIN is irrelevant on smaller EV14 injectors on these cars, as the value is small enough to not really cause a problem.

The only right way to find the value though is to observe the injectors on a bench and do a series of tests.
And of course this value will also depend on the rail pressure...

Truth be told, I am not sure what the "minimum pulsewidth" value specifies on the injector spec and whether it includes the offset or not.
But I know from personal testing on a bench, that the 0.7ms can not be the minimum effective injection time value for the 550cc injectors... as they are deterministic far below that.

Why idle that high? 

Nothing I was just asking, wondered if you gonna jump on it -- Nah just kidding, my jokes are never good 
Here is the same for me at idle after startup and coolant being at around 80degC as well, and starting to drive
at the end of it.

I have tuned both injectors, I have dead time data for them.
I never needed to do anything with the PW curve, because in my application they were linear down to 0.5ms TE and that was good enough for me.
I did not tune this on ME7.
Those 550cc/500cc injectors - there are three types of them with the same part number. Ford Motorsport, Bosch and Bosch Industrial.
Bosch and Bosch industrial flow 500cc. The Ford motorsport flow 550cc. The Bosch code for all of them is exactly the same.

TVUB for both types of injectors is pretty much the same too.

And this is way too high. You will be fine even with 0.3ms TEMIN.

This is nothing to do with the real world. Note, this is an "init" value or default value. There is a difference between a recommended value in the application hints and between the default/init value.
The init value simply means that this is what is set to when Bosch compiles the project and outputs a binary, nothing more, nothing less. Drawing any conclusions from it is incorrect.

So which numbers are right to that map?