daniel2345
Full Member
Karma: +11/-8
 Online
Posts: 200
|
 |
« Reply #2805 on: February 01, 2025, 06:06:38 AM »
|
|
|
Yes, well done. Now you have a better understanding. My post was not meant to offend you. It should give some hint about the effort needed  And it took you two years, as estimated. If one is willing to invest that, succees will appear For all Volvo control units of that area CAN Stack is defined and implemented via Volcano Toolchain. Little but some info available. The Toolchain packs the CAN Configuration in a property format and implements this via CPU Specific Hardware abstraction. Sometimes packed database is referred as SigCfg. You will find similar structures on same processor families. But different implementation for C167, SHx, M32, MCS8/12... Same approach for today's development using eg. Vector Microsar, Autosar, Software integration packages, DaVinci Configurator,... |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 01, 2025, 06:12:51 AM by daniel2345 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
emilvolvo
Newbie
Karma: +0/-1
 Offline
Posts: 5
|
|
« Reply #2806 on: February 02, 2025, 06:39:40 AM »
|
|
|
Witam wszystkich mile widzianych i zapracowanych zmieniam maf z orginału s60r na maf rs4 wszystko zostaje w orginale tak jak wtryski zielone turbo k24 załaczam oba softy prosze o porownanie dziekuje wszystkim
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 02, 2025, 09:30:40 AM by emilvolvo »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
emilvolvo
Newbie
Karma: +0/-1
Offline
Posts: 5
|
|
« Reply #2807 on: February 02, 2025, 06:44:22 AM »
|
|
|
czy ten soft bedzie dobry do nowego maf rs4
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 02, 2025, 09:26:17 AM by emilvolvo »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
keichi
Full Member
Karma: +11/-2
Offline
Posts: 105
|
|
« Reply #2808 on: February 03, 2025, 04:18:14 AM »
|
|
|
czy ten soft bedzie dobry do nowego maf rs4
Skalowanie MAF ok. Tak z ciekawości po co taki MAF do K24? Wyłączyłeś ATR (niepotrzebnie - mega przydatna funkcja). Zostaw ATR tylko zmniejsz dawkę bo w serii zalewa silnik. Taka ciekawostka przy okazji - diagnostyka ATR którą włączyłeś (chociaż wyłączyłeś ATR xD) w naszych autach nie działa (to jest algorytm pod VAGi z sondą EGT). W BTS zalewasz silnik 11AFR. Poza tym masz TABGBTS na 900 stopni więc praktycznie BTS nie jest używany Nie strój paliwa samą LAMFĄ LAMFE zrób ubogą typu 13-12,7 a dolewaj BTS po obciążeniu. LAMFA i BTS musza razem "współpracować". To takie "najgorsze" rzeczy przez które łatwo wysadzić silnik  WDKSMX - zostaw serię Tam po to jest niecałe 100% żeby PID mógł pracować. To Ci nie da więcej mocy W KFLDRL zdjąłeś WG a w LDIMX dodałeś czyli w sumie nic się nie zmieniło xD Zostaw KFLDRL serię (jest fajnie wyskalowana pod nieliniowość WG) a modyfikuj tylko LDIMX. Jak masz gruchę poprawnie naciągniętą to seryjne LDIMX wymaga drobnych korekt tylko. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 03, 2025, 04:38:04 AM by keichi »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
emilvolvo
Newbie
Karma: +0/-1
Offline
Posts: 5
|
|
« Reply #2809 on: February 03, 2025, 05:09:08 AM »
|
|
|
Orginalny maf jest maksymalnie wykorzystany ten ma obsłużyć większą masę przepływu powietrza
Rs4 jest wydajniejszy
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 03, 2025, 05:15:01 AM by emilvolvo »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
keichi
Full Member
Karma: +11/-2
Offline
Posts: 105
|
|
« Reply #2810 on: February 03, 2025, 12:34:19 PM »
|
|
|
Orginalny maf jest maksymalnie wykorzystany ten ma obsłużyć większą masę przepływu powietrza
Rs4 jest wydajniejszy
A co to za turbo tam masz tak z ciekawości? W sensie co to za hybryda kosmiczna Maks. co widziałem z hybrydy K24 jakiejś monstrualnej (wirniki jak w GTX30 xD) to robiła jakieś 330-340g/s |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prometey1982
|
|
« Reply #2811 on: February 05, 2025, 05:31:35 AM »
|
|
|
In VolvoTools was added support of UDS protocol logging. Tested on Volvo Denso ECM module. Not tested on ME9 P3. https://github.com/prometey1982/VolvoToolsUnfortunately Denso module can't register more that 7 bytes by 0x2C UDS service for single DID. So I had to register each parameter in distinct DID. Later I'll try to optimize number of DIDs by grouping of parameters by memory size. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SparkyR
Full Member
Karma: +19/-21
Offline
Posts: 84
|
|
« Reply #2812 on: February 14, 2025, 03:24:57 PM »
|
|
|
Strapped the car to the dyno today. Makes some good power and learned some from a very experienced tuner on site. Everything as of now works great but the cold starting on e85 is horrendous and cranks for 2-5 min before it starts. Any advice on making this better?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
2005 S60R m66, Xona Rotor 7864, turbosmart 45mm wastegate, 1300cc injectors
|
|
|
|
prj
|
|
« Reply #2813 on: February 15, 2025, 10:49:31 AM »
|
|
|
Everything as of now works great but the cold starting on e85 is horrendous and cranks for 2-5 min before it starts. Any advice on making this better? Yes, look up evaporation rates of gasoline vs ethanol and adjust enrichment accordingly. You will be surprised once you look at the data. There is no really good way to do this other than having a sensor though and storing the last detected ethanol percentage in memory between cold starts. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
keichi
Full Member
Karma: +11/-2
Offline
Posts: 105
|
|
« Reply #2814 on: February 25, 2025, 01:52:29 PM »
|
|
|
Has anyone managed to connect with cheap china Mongoose JLR in OpenMoose? I tested BETA8, B10 and B12 and they all reject connection. As i have my own simple custom ME7 Volvo logger i probably found the solution i hope. It turns out the problem is in PassThruOpen DLL function. It expects device name as first parameter. DICE driver DLL expects device name like "DiCE-206751". But Mongoose DLL from the other hand will throw ERR_DEVICE_NOT_CONNECTED when you pass proper device name. Actually it will reject any device name and will connect only when you pass empty string as device name. So whoever maintains OpenMoose project please check it out |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
s60rawr
|
|
« Reply #2815 on: February 25, 2025, 06:39:09 PM »
|
|
|
Has anyone managed to connect with cheap china Mongoose JLR in OpenMoose? I tested BETA8, B10 and B12 and they all reject connection. As i have my own simple custom ME7 Volvo logger i probably found the solution i hope. It turns out the problem is in PassThruOpen DLL function. It expects device name as first parameter. DICE driver DLL expects device name like "DiCE-206751". But Mongoose DLL from the other hand will throw ERR_DEVICE_NOT_CONNECTED when you pass proper device name. Actually it will reject any device name and will connect only when you pass empty string as device name. So whoever maintains OpenMoose project please check it out It is currently in testing with very good results. Was motivated by the abundance of fake dice. Nothing released publicly yet. I imagine I will post when it does. rlinewiz is the brains of it if you wanna talk to him. He has his contact on OpenMoose.net |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
There is a free flash suite in progres
http://www.openmoose.net/blog/?page=renatus #1 Nefmoto -Karma Sponge! |
|
|
evolve
Jr. Member
Karma: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 26
|
|
« Reply #2816 on: March 03, 2025, 12:08:08 AM »
|
|
|
Hi Volbros,
Im so close to having a tune I like, Have done a lot of tweeking. Both E85 and 98
Im reading about Wategate and that its in KFVPDK SE and SD
Im getting confused between the S4wiki and finding cracking pressure and what people are doing (which is more external wastegate)
The Data in the SE Row doesnt make sense even if do minus 1bar. I have a feeling my cracking psi its at 2.
Ive seen some adjust row and table.
Say I want to go from a 3psi spring to a 7psi any quick tips on what I should do?
Im happy with how the TD04HL-20T is going not over boosting hitting 16.5 psi every time, AFRS are good, EGTS are pretty good. If I can work out Wategate I have a range of springs I can play with to stop that Juddering at part throttle.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 03, 2025, 04:15:01 AM by evolve »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prj
|
|
« Reply #2817 on: March 03, 2025, 03:28:41 AM »
|
|
|
As a start you should define the maps correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dikidera
Full Member
Karma: +10/-8
Offline
Posts: 152
|
|
« Reply #2818 on: March 15, 2025, 12:52:29 AM »
|
|
|
Does anyone know what the maximum lift a camshaft can have(with the vvt all the way advanced) before there is piston to valve contact?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
acoffinship
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 10
|
|
« Reply #2819 on: March 15, 2025, 03:15:51 AM »
|
|
|
Most likely ATR is turned off via codeword. And if it isn't, then these "most people" you are referring to have no idea WTF they are doing I'm back from the dead lol. So what is the proper way to do all of this? Why would you disable ATR, a safety measure to prevent engine failure? I do not see ATR mentioned by nyet in the Stage1 2.7 topic: My list:
LDRXN - requested load cap (increase boost)
NMAX - rev limiter (easy, because it is a single value!)
VMAX - speed limiter (easy, because it is a single value!)
LAMFA - one of three ways to do fueling.. I'm not sure it is the easiest, because it requires two somewhat confusing related changes:
1) req torque axis - changing axis data is tricky, and to make matters worse, stock axis values are kinda screwed up
2) low pass filter/time constant changes - the time constant value is somewhat odd, in that its units are strange.
We could alternately do fueling via BTS or KR, but both have their own oddities. Opinions? https://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=6695.msg61810#msg61810 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
