Today arrived my KKL cable, works like charm.
I've read my flash and compared it to the stock 032HJ I downloaded from this forum (Was suspicious about each HJ from each car had any different code area or whatever). It was identical.
I Copypasted all the changes I did last days in the downloaded hj file to my own hj anyway... I'm too maniac and scared of myself 

But now i need your help mates, I tried to correct the checksums with me7sum... it corrects all except 1, and I can't get rid of it.

I'm thinking about purchasing the tunerpro checksum plugin but last months were economically detrimental... The student economy, you know...
So could anyone kindly correct my checksums? 

I attach both files, original and modified and gonna open a thread in "Checksums request", I think maybe it's the correct place for it.

Thanks a lot lot lot lot Marty for your help with checksums.

I've just flashed to the car and it pulls a lot more. Seems everything is OK but I'm gonna do some logs to be sure anyway.
I'm gonna upload everything I consider important here to keep helping this great community.

I cannot say anything but THANK YOU ALL, NEFMOTO.


Edit: Thank you too panos1975, sorry for not editting before, hope didn't mean a waste of your time.

First things first, the only important mod I've done is maximum specified load (LDRXN & LDRXNZK, I think it's called zk, anyway, under knocking), just for having a base and later, modify any other map if nedeed (Other stuff made is allowing left foot braking and increasing a bit the rev limiter)

So, here's my LDRXN (maximum specified load) modification:
Red = AUM stock
Blue = AUQ stock
Green = Modified óptimum
Orange = Modified under knocking
The reason for making such a curve is to try to keep my clutch safe, torque is what hurts, not power. Now my peak torque is 244Nm@5000prm (obtained from power and engine speed, power obtained from /0.8 rule)
So, I can increase a bit on the midrange without exceeding that 244Nm





Now the logs:






I exctract several conclussions:

I were too optimistic setting LDRXN to a maximum of 150, maybe a totally new and stock AUM can make it, but not my boost-leaking one (Totally stock too)

Maybe that difference between specified and actual load is causing a soft limp mode. I think 0.75 lambdas are way too rich, and driver's requested lambda is stock. perhaps the ecu inyects more fuel to prevent from knocking and/or high combustion temperatures, thinking the engine is not OK due to that load defect.

Other aspect is making me think it's causing a limp mode is ingition timming... none knocking or retardation (I'm using 95 otcane spanish petrol), but is logical with such a rich mixture. The thing is requested angle is too low... with stock 032hj 150bhp file, angles were by far more than 20, and again, timming maps are stock (maybe theres a lot of variation with load, but I don't remember though)



So my idea to the remap revision is to decrease maximum LDRXN to, maybe 143... In that case, the engine can produce that load and there'll be no limp modes.
I'm gonna try a double cone filter from a friend this days to see if 150 of load is not reached because of the restrictive stock air intake, but not so sure about it.

Any advice mates? what do you think?


Ps: One aspect, I'm loosing less boost now than before the remap, I don't understand. And before the remap my n75 was on limp mode working always at 5.1%, and now goes like charm... really, I don't understand it

OK, I've corrected LDRXN to values much closer to the obtained in logs. Hope this time lambdas/afr become logical. But I need to correct checksums once more.

Any member can do it for me?


Ps: For the near future, tunerpro checksum plugin works fine? I don't wanna pay for something that doesn't do its job, but I hate asking for mates to correct my checks every time I do a mod... It makes me feel bad. I mean, members that have purchased WinOLS, very expensive, you correct my checks for free... A couple of times is ok, but asking for more seems antiethcal to me.




Take a look at reply 3 at http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=6788.0title= , Maybe there some mate has already corrected the checksums and I don't want you to work in vane

Checks corrected in the checksums thread, many thanks panos1975

1) don't use VCDS for logging, use ME7Logger + ECUxPlot for plotting.
2) req/actual load doesn't tell you much, you need req/actual boost.
3) ALWAYS POST THE ORIGINAL CSVs

Faster sample rate, far more simultaneous variables.


There is no ME PID that adjusts boost based on the difference between spec load and actual load.