Pages: 1 ... 80 81 [82] 83 84 ... 173
Author Topic: The Volvo ME7 thread:  (Read 930567 times)
Mladen
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 50


« Reply #1215 on: September 05, 2019, 07:35:25 AM »

Not sarcasm, I've taken an interest and you do seem to be getting somewhere. What's next then? Have you compared the other maps in T5 cars? KFZWOP and KFZW are detuned if ur starting on an LPT, then maybe revisit PED IOP and IRL to get the power delivery you want if your boost limits are now high enough.

I don`t have a proper defined file for a T5. I have tried comparing with WinOls but it does not seem to work. Maybe you can help?
My understanding is that WOP does not need to be modified?
KFZW- My understanding is that I would need to LOWER timing at higher loads and rpm? Or keep same and use 94 Octane? I know that without a proper dyno and logging its impossible to get timing right so I would rather not play with it except to make sure not to melt the block.
What do I need to do for PED?
IOP and IRL have been modified. No interventions.
Fuel injectors have been tuned.
Logged
jahko
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +2/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 47


« Reply #1216 on: September 05, 2019, 12:25:23 PM »

If you've defined your car and have bins for others you've got it all. Look at what Volvo did. Make changes and see what happens, it won't let you melt the block.
Logged
Opti
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 43


« Reply #1217 on: September 05, 2019, 12:40:54 PM »

I modified hpa axis in IMX to 1000 on the last colomn, and the 2 before that respectfully. Kept the map data the same. Took the car for a drive and after 2 days boost builds to 14 psi and tapers off to 10psi towards 6000rpm.

Not sure I follow here, but if you've left the map-data the same for that table then you will not see any positive changes by just changing the axis. If your max axis value is for example 800 mbar, but you request 1000 mbar of boost then the ECU will use the values in the 800 mbar column. Now if you change only the axis, then you will get the same I-input in the 1000 mbar column as you previously did in the 800 mbar column, but if the boost request is now 800 mbar you will get less I-input than you did before, since you've left the map-data unchanged. You need to scale the whole map (or area in which you changed the axis) so that it now fits with the new axis. Hope that makes sense.
Logged
Mladen
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 50


« Reply #1218 on: September 06, 2019, 06:44:12 AM »

Not sure I follow here, but if you've left the map-data the same for that table then you will not see any positive changes by just changing the axis. If your max axis value is for example 800 mbar, but you request 1000 mbar of boost then the ECU will use the values in the 800 mbar column. Now if you change only the axis, then you will get the same I-input in the 1000 mbar column as you previously did in the 800 mbar column, but if the boost request is now 800 mbar you will get less I-input than you did before, since you've left the map-data unchanged. You need to scale the whole map (or area in which you changed the axis) so that it now fits with the new axis. Hope that makes sense.

this is what I did. I am still experimenting with it. (KFLDIMX)
My LDRXN will look like this now.
Dont mind Y axis in LDRXN. Its not defined.
Logged
Opti
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 43


« Reply #1219 on: September 06, 2019, 09:06:14 AM »

You should move the map-data for the 800 column so that you can tune the I-part in the 1000 column if you do not see the expected boost for that boost request. See illustration.
Logged
Mladen
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 50


« Reply #1220 on: September 06, 2019, 09:45:43 AM »

You should move the map-data for the 800 column so that you can tune the I-part in the 1000 column if you do not see the expected boost for that boost request. See illustration.

Do I keep map data the same for 1000? or does it make sense to increase, even if its above 100%
Logged
jahko
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +2/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 47


« Reply #1221 on: September 06, 2019, 10:53:13 AM »

set em at 100 and take it for a drive
Logged
jcdillin
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


« Reply #1222 on: September 20, 2019, 09:34:23 AM »

great thread, I've read through a few times and I saw it was requested but never posted. Does anyone have an 04 S60R or V70R auto ECU bin file?
Logged
thedrill
Full Member
***

Karma: +12/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 139



« Reply #1223 on: September 25, 2019, 10:40:27 AM »

Has anyone got the exact location of CDKAT in a 2006 S60R (50WRHJ)
 I have tried 18005 and 1800A , I know its close by ...
Logged
contrast
Full Member
***

Karma: +20/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 215


« Reply #1224 on: September 26, 2019, 08:34:18 AM »

Has anyone got the exact location of CDKAT in a 2006 S60R (50WRHJ)
 I have tried 18005 and 1800A , I know its close by ...

There are quite a few different 50WRHJ variants.
Logged
thedrill
Full Member
***

Karma: +12/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 139



« Reply #1225 on: September 26, 2019, 09:40:26 AM »

Here is the original file..
Logged
contrast
Full Member
***

Karma: +20/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 215


« Reply #1226 on: September 26, 2019, 01:15:35 PM »

0x1800E
Logged
thedrill
Full Member
***

Karma: +12/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 139



« Reply #1227 on: September 26, 2019, 02:14:50 PM »

Your a gent.. thank you.
Logged
Kacza
Full Member
***

Karma: +20/-6
Offline Offline

Posts: 213


« Reply #1228 on: September 30, 2019, 01:53:05 PM »

Does anyone have the original file for Volvo V70 XC 2.4T?
0261204559-sw-1037359462-sw-upg-20FWHJ
Logged
thedrill
Full Member
***

Karma: +12/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 139



« Reply #1229 on: September 30, 2019, 03:33:34 PM »

Here is a semi stock file off my friends dads xc70 2.4... increase on idle and ldxrn .
I may have the original file I pulled off the car.. just have to look on my laptop for it.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 80 81 [82] 83 84 ... 173
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.026 seconds with 16 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)