|
prometey1982
|
 |
« Reply #1275 on: September 11, 2020, 04:33:05 AM »
|
|
|
But now we actually having some problems with the boost insteed, it want to buld to much boost reguardles what we do.. If I unplugg the N75 valve it does 0,5bar.. If I plug it in 1,7bar and more..
Yes I have tried new N75 and also an aftermarket MAC valve..
You need to recalculate your KFLDRX map. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fides
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
 Offline
Posts: 21
|
|
« Reply #1276 on: September 11, 2020, 06:31:28 AM »
|
|
|
You need to recalculate your KFLDRX map.
Okey, thanx for answer.. I am kind a rookie on this with those names for maps, but Im guessing its someting tourqe request related? Any tip on how I shall recalculate it? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rolle1974
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 25
|
|
« Reply #1277 on: September 30, 2020, 01:21:23 AM »
|
|
|
KRKTE and TVUB? cant find it...... Help !!! Change from blue to green injectors. S60 T5 aut -03
Edit: Maby find it.
KRKTE 19CC0
TVUB 15066
Confirm it anyone?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 30, 2020, 04:57:31 PM by Rolle1974 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prometey1982
|
|
« Reply #1278 on: October 21, 2020, 06:54:43 AM »
|
|
|
KRKTE and TVUB? cant find it...... Help !!! Change from blue to green injectors. S60 T5 aut -03
Edit: Maby find it.
KRKTE 19CC0
TVUB 15066
Confirm it anyone?
Your TVUB is correct. KRKTE has 2250A address. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rolle1974
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 25
|
|
« Reply #1279 on: October 21, 2020, 12:33:12 PM »
|
|
|
Your TVUB is correct. KRKTE has 2250A address.
Thx |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jahko
Jr. Member
Karma: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 47
|
|
« Reply #1280 on: October 22, 2020, 05:35:33 AM »
|
|
|
Does anyone agree that with the amount of effort put into this post and the length of it all, we could maybe make a new "community tune" type thread to tidy it up a bit? Obviously there won't be 1 file that fits all but we could put all the posts with uploaded files, definitions etc in there, then people could find stuff closest to their own without having to ask the same questions? I'd put a bit of work into it, I've learnt loads from this
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fides
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 21
|
|
« Reply #1281 on: October 22, 2020, 05:44:02 AM »
|
|
|
Does anyone agree that with the amount of effort put into this post and the length of it all, we could maybe make a new "community tune" type thread to tidy it up a bit? Obviously there won't be 1 file that fits all but we could put all the posts with uploaded files, definitions etc in there, then people could find stuff closest to their own without having to ask the same questions? I'd put a bit of work into it, I've learnt loads from this
WOnderful idea!! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prometey1982
|
|
« Reply #1282 on: October 22, 2020, 01:02:39 PM »
|
|
|
Here is my latest changes (versioning OLS) https://cloud.mail.ru/public/8X4F/2aDU9KTYyWith this BIN (version named changed angle) my car does 0-100 in 7.5 sec. XC90 2.5T with K24 turbo and some other stuff. S60 T5 2006 aw55 (bin supports aw55 and tf80 gearboxes) accelerates 0-100 in 6 secs. Also I found a problem. On 1 and 2 gears I got rlsol_w about 160%. But on 3 gear I got 200% and better acceleration that on second gear. So I'm trying to find limiter which limits rlsol_w on first 2 gears. From my point of view it's TCU's behavior. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fides
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 21
|
|
« Reply #1283 on: October 23, 2020, 06:50:11 AM »
|
|
|
Here is my latest changes (versioning OLS) https://cloud.mail.ru/public/8X4F/2aDU9KTYyWith this BIN (version named changed angle) my car does 0-100 in 7.5 sec. XC90 2.5T with K24 turbo and some other stuff. S60 T5 2006 aw55 (bin supports aw55 and tf80 gearboxes) accelerates 0-100 in 6 secs. Also I found a problem. On 1 and 2 gears I got rlsol_w about 160%. But on 3 gear I got 200% and better acceleration that on second gear. So I'm trying to find limiter which limits rlsol_w on first 2 gears. From my point of view it's TCU's behavior. I really have to ask: What tool and software are you using to log that from an Volvo? I have 4 volvos my own and its always hard to do a nice log and find pids.. And what tool do you read/writeing the Temic TCU with? Best requards |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prometey1982
|
|
« Reply #1284 on: October 23, 2020, 12:22:51 PM »
|
|
|
I really have to ask: What tool and software are you using to log that from an Volvo?
I have 4 volvos my own and its always hard to do a nice log and find pids..
And what tool do you read/writeing the Temic TCU with?
Best requards
Sorry, I can't answer about ECU writing and logging tools. My TF80 TCU was modified and allows to flash over OBD via EcuFlash tool. About variables. I just dissassembled my BIN and found all needed variables and MAPs. I.e. not all but almost all needed. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prometey1982
|
|
« Reply #1285 on: October 23, 2020, 12:38:20 PM »
|
|
|
Here is my current IDA project with s60r TF80SC BIN. https://cloud.mail.ru/public/3xzh/5c1AwjReVAlso I found a limiter for rlsol_w which limits this value to 160% on 1 and 2 gears. I've replaced jmp instruction to nop. This hack allows me to got 180+% rl_w on 1 and 2 gears. Version named "removed torque limiter" contains this change https://cloud.mail.ru/public/3Yeq/5nBCr1LbnI'm trying to understand how much rl_w I can get from my current hardware config. IMO rl_w 180% with 1.45 kPa pressure is too low. So I'll log pvdkds_w, lamsoni_w, rl_w, zwout, zwist, mshfm_w and injecting timing for next analizing. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prometey1982
|
|
« Reply #1286 on: October 24, 2020, 04:04:42 AM »
|
|
|
Current 0-100 result after torque limiter "hack" was applied.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
daniel2345
Full Member
Karma: +11/-7
 Online
Posts: 197
|
|
« Reply #1287 on: October 24, 2020, 05:54:02 AM »
|
|
|
Why don't you just tell the Aisin TCU to not cap the torque in the lower gears when you can flash it?
If you disable this path at all, no torque reduction during shift is applied on air path.
Dangerous in my opinion, especially with the weak internals of the Ravigneaux gearset.
If you want better drivability and fuel economy, try the 630ccm Siemens DekaIV.
The 550ccm are realy realy awful bad in that.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 24, 2020, 05:55:37 AM by daniel2345 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prometey1982
|
|
« Reply #1288 on: October 24, 2020, 06:27:41 AM »
|
|
|
Why don't you just tell the Aisin TCU to not cap the torque in the lower gears when you can flash it?
If you disable this path at all, no torque reduction during shift is applied on air path.
Dangerous in my opinion, especially with the weak internals of the Ravigneaux gearset.
If you want better drivability and fuel economy, try the 630ccm Siemens DekaIV.
The 550ccm are realy realy awful bad in that.
No, I didn't remove torque lowering on shifting. This log contains shift from 2 to 3 and torque request dropped at selected point. Moreover I logged dropping of torque request on this shift. About TCU, I didn't analyzed BIN. Renesas assembler if very awful from my point of view. Very difficult to understand. I can share TCU's bin if you can analyze it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Blazius
|
|
« Reply #1289 on: October 24, 2020, 10:46:53 AM »
|
|
|
Why don't you just tell the Aisin TCU to not cap the torque in the lower gears when you can flash it?
If you disable this path at all, no torque reduction during shift is applied on air path.
Dangerous in my opinion, especially with the weak internals of the Ravigneaux gearset.
If you want better drivability and fuel economy, try the 630ccm Siemens DekaIV.
The 550ccm are realy realy awful bad in that.
Deka's are awful, not just on 20V heads, but generally. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
