NefMoto > Technical > Tuning > The Volvo ME7 thread:
Pages: 1 ... 85 86 [87] 88 89 ... 182
« previous next »
Author Topic: The Volvo ME7 thread:  (Read 1083789 times)
daniel2345
Full Member
***

Karma: +11/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 197
« Reply #1290 on: October 24, 2020, 11:48:35 AM »
Hehe, you made a different experience?

I tried a lot the past 15 years. Four Spray Dekas work very well on these Volvos. My experience.
Sure, you must do more than shifting TVUB up and down, but i guess you know Smiley
Logged
Blazius
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-40
Offline Offline

Posts: 1282
« Reply #1291 on: October 24, 2020, 12:13:19 PM »
Quote from: daniel2345 on October 24, 2020, 11:48:35 AM
Hehe, you made a different experience?

I tried a lot the past 15 years. Four Spray Dekas work very well on these Volvos. My experience.
Sure, you must do more than shifting TVUB up and down, but i guess you know Smiley

Not just about that, like people mentioned, they are very temp influenced for one , and very unlinear on low and high pw, but if it works it works, but I wouldnt say that they are better than any kind of bosch injectors, since they come with any size , neck or spray angle/port you need. Maybe they are made for volvo's  Cheesy
Logged
prometey1982
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +70/-60
Online Online

Posts: 323



WWW
« Reply #1292 on: October 24, 2020, 02:09:10 PM »
I'm using Denso 550cc injectors from Subaru WRX STI knowns like pink. They have longer dead time than green injectors but works fine for me. And for my power is more that enough. But I want to get 400 bhp from my engine and 0-100 around 6 secs. I'll happy if I'll get it from XC90 with 2.5T engine.
Logged
Россия - Великая страна!
https://youtu.be/fup5GzIFdXk
prometey1982
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +70/-60
Online Online

Posts: 323



WWW
« Reply #1293 on: October 25, 2020, 05:37:40 AM »
To prevent underboost I've sightly tightened WG spring. And got next results
Logged
Россия - Великая страна!
https://youtu.be/fup5GzIFdXk
prometey1982
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +70/-60
Online Online

Posts: 323



WWW
« Reply #1294 on: November 05, 2020, 05:33:50 AM »
Some more investigations. There is a function which calculates lamfa_w variable. This variable clipped by hardcoded value 0x1000 which means 1.0 lambda value.
But code can be patched. Just replacing of 1000h with 1100h in three places allows to increase lamfa_w value to 1.1. I didn't do road tests maybe there are limitations if different places but they also can be found.

Quote
ROM:0008AA6E LAMFAW:                                 ; DATA XREF: ROM:00011380o
ROM:0008AA6E                 mov     [-r0], r9
ROM:0008AA70                 mov     [-r0], r8
ROM:0008AA72                 mov     r4, mrfa_w_0
ROM:0008AA76                 mov     [-r0], r4
ROM:0008AA78                 movbz   r5, nmot40
ROM:0008AA7C                 mov     [-r0], r5
ROM:0008AA7E                 mov     r4, #3930h
ROM:0008AA82                 mov     r5, #8
ROM:0008AA86                 mov     [-r0], r5
ROM:0008AA88                 mov     [-r0], r4
ROM:0008AA8A                 mov     r4, #3924h
ROM:0008AA8E                 mov     r5, #8
ROM:0008AA92                 mov     [-r0], r5
ROM:0008AA94                 mov     [-r0], r4
ROM:0008AA96                 extp    #8, #1
ROM:0008AA9A                 movbz   r12, byte_23912
ROM:0008AA9E                 mov     r13, #3914h     ; LAMFA
ROM:0008AAA2                 mov     r14, #8
ROM:0008AAA6                 extp    #8, #1
ROM:0008AAAA                 movbz   r15, byte_23913
ROM:0008AAAE                 calls   4, sub_428E2
ROM:0008AAB2                 add     r0, #0Ch
ROM:0008AAB6                 movbz   r8, rl4
ROM:0008AAB8                 shl     r8, #5
ROM:0008AABA                 cmp     r8, #1000h
ROM:0008AABE                 jmpr    cc_NZ, loc_8AACA
ROM:0008AAC0                 movb    byte_3008A6, ZEROS
ROM:0008AAC4                 mov     r9, #1000h
ROM:0008AAC8                 jmpr    cc_UC, loc_8AAE6
ROM:0008AACA ; ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROM:0008AACA
ROM:0008AACA loc_8AACA:                              ; CODE XREF: LAMFAW+50j
ROM:0008AACA                 movb    rl4, byte_3008A6
ROM:0008AACE                 extp    #6, #1
ROM:0008AAD2                 cmpb    rl4, byte_19C58
ROM:0008AAD6                 jmpr    cc_NC, loc_8AAE4
ROM:0008AAD8                 addb    rl4, #1
ROM:0008AADA                 movb    byte_3008A6, rl4
ROM:0008AADE                 mov     r9, #1000h
ROM:0008AAE2                 jmpr    cc_UC, loc_8AAE6
ROM:0008AAE4 ; ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROM:0008AAE4
ROM:0008AAE4 loc_8AAE4:                              ; CODE XREF: LAMFAW+68j
ROM:0008AAE4                 mov     r9, r8
ROM:0008AAE6
ROM:0008AAE6 loc_8AAE6:                              ; CODE XREF: LAMFAW+5Aj
ROM:0008AAE6                                         ; LAMFAW+74j
ROM:0008AAE6                 jnb     word_FD7C.13, loc_8AB10
ROM:0008AAEA                 mov     r12, #1C4Bh
ROM:0008AAEE                 mov     r13, #6
ROM:0008AAF2                 movbz   r14, nmot40
ROM:0008AAF6                 calls   4, LookupI_41cee ; References a lookupI table
ROM:0008AAFA                 movbz   r4, rl4
ROM:0008AAFC                 shl     r4, #5
ROM:0008AAFE                 mov     r5, r9
ROM:0008AB00                 sub     r5, r4
ROM:0008AB02                 jmpr    cc_NC, loc_8AB06
ROM:0008AB04                 mov     r5, #0
ROM:0008AB06
ROM:0008AB06 loc_8AB06:                              ; CODE XREF: LAMFAW+94j
ROM:0008AB06                 extp    #0C1h, #1 ; '+'
ROM:0008AB0A                 mov     lamfa_w, r5
ROM:0008AB0E                 jmpr    cc_UC, loc_8AB18
ROM:0008AB10 ; ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROM:0008AB10
ROM:0008AB10 loc_8AB10:                              ; CODE XREF: LAMFAW:loc_8AAE6j
ROM:0008AB10                 extp    #0C1h, #1 ; '+'
ROM:0008AB14                 mov     lamfa_w, r9
ROM:0008AB18
ROM:0008AB18 loc_8AB18:                              ; CODE XREF: LAMFAW+A0j
ROM:0008AB18                 mov     r8, [r0+]
ROM:0008AB1A                 mov     r9, [r0+]
ROM:0008AB1C                 rets
ROM:0008AB1C ; End of function LAMFAW
Logged
Россия - Великая страна!
https://youtu.be/fup5GzIFdXk
vwdenisvw
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +2/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 27
« Reply #1295 on: November 20, 2020, 05:06:24 PM »
Hi everyone. In advance, I want to thank the users and founders of this forum. I emphasized almost all the knowledge from here.

My friend and I are trying to set up my car. In this case, full noob. But something was figured out. Car Volvo S60 2.3T5 2001. Of the rework, only full exhaust 3" and fuel pump walbro 400lph.
Below I will lay out the cards that I found. And modified *.bin.

As a result, it turned out to increase the boost to 1.3 bar and 0.85 bar to the redline. The KFMIRL map recalculated the maximum LDRXN. KFLDHBN was not edited. Because use standart intercooler. Increase of temperature by 4 gears 100-200 km/h from 15 to 45-50 gr.C.
The ignition angle at full load was also increased. And in some places they increased the ignition angle at the average load (this is just an experiment) (KFZW).
Raised idle speed to 750 rpm (NLLM).
Catalyst Health Check (CDKAT) is disabled.

But there were problems. Afr is always 14.7. Until the KFLBTS map is enabled. TABGBTS activation threshold. If we disable FBSTABGM it will be fixed? Then the engine should work on the KFLBTS map always?. LAMFA I have everywhere "1." This map probably doesn't make sense to adjust.

We also tried to edit the Delta Lambda (DLAMOB) parameter. Set the minar value - enrichment completely turned off. AFR is always 14.7 from 2000-6500 rpm. Got it back.

I very much ask for help in solving the problem with afr.
KFLBTS found, but there is a problem with the axis.
TABGBTS, FBSTABGM did not find.
IDA has not yet been dealt with.

p.s. I'm ashamed of my bad English...
Logged
Volvo S60 2001 2.0T=>2.3T5=>2.0T=>d5t5
vwdenisvw
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +2/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 27
« Reply #1296 on: November 20, 2020, 05:30:31 PM »
Quote from: prometey1982 on October 25, 2020, 05:37:40 AM
To prevent underboost I've sightly tightened WG spring. And got next results
And this is really darn fast.

Owners of xc90 v8 on drive2 hike burned ass)) sorry
Logged
Volvo S60 2001 2.0T=>2.3T5=>2.0T=>d5t5
prometey1982
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +70/-60
Online Online

Posts: 323



WWW
« Reply #1297 on: November 20, 2020, 10:56:02 PM »
Quote from: vwdenisvw on November 20, 2020, 05:06:24 PM
But there were problems. Afr is always 14.7. Until the KFLBTS map is enabled. TABGBTS activation threshold. If we disable FBSTABGM it will be fixed? Then the engine should work on the KFLBTS map always?. LAMFA I have everywhere "1." This map probably doesn't make sense to adjust.
You need to update LAMFA map values. There is my LAMFA map.
Logged
Россия - Великая страна!
https://youtu.be/fup5GzIFdXk
vwdenisvw
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +2/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 27
« Reply #1298 on: November 21, 2020, 02:27:39 AM »
Quote from: prometey1982 on November 20, 2020, 10:56:02 PM
You need to update LAMFA map values. There is my LAMFA map.
Does lamfa match the actual value?
Logged
Volvo S60 2001 2.0T=>2.3T5=>2.0T=>d5t5
prometey1982
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +70/-60
Online Online

Posts: 323



WWW
« Reply #1299 on: November 21, 2020, 10:03:35 AM »
Quote from: vwdenisvw on November 21, 2020, 02:27:39 AM
Does lamfa match the actual value?
Yes when modelled EGT less than TABGBTS.
Logged
Россия - Великая страна!
https://youtu.be/fup5GzIFdXk
prometey1982
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +70/-60
Online Online

Posts: 323



WWW
« Reply #1300 on: November 21, 2020, 02:05:59 PM »
Quote from: vwdenisvw on November 20, 2020, 05:06:24 PM
I very much ask for help in solving the problem with afr.
KFLBTS found, but there is a problem with the axis.
TABGBTS, FBSTABGM did not find.
TABGBTS - 0x1EA9E - 16 bit. Factor 0,019531, offset -50
In your file 950 grad C.

FBSTABGM - 0x1EA7C - 16 bit 4x1. Factor 0,000031. Factor for X axis 0,019531, offset -50,000000.

KFLBTS - axis for load is at 0x1EA86. 16 bit. Factor 0,023438.
Logged
Россия - Великая страна!
https://youtu.be/fup5GzIFdXk
prometey1982
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +70/-60
Online Online

Posts: 323



WWW
« Reply #1301 on: November 22, 2020, 05:39:35 AM »
Quote from: prometey1982 on November 05, 2020, 05:33:50 AM
Some more investigations. There is a function which calculates lamfa_w variable. This variable clipped by hardcoded value 0x1000 which means 1.0 lambda value.
But code can be patched. Just replacing of 1000h with 1100h in three places allows to increase lamfa_w value to 1.1. I didn't do road tests maybe there are limitations if different places but they also can be found.

I've tried to modify a code in such way and it didn't work. But lamfa_w value was lean that 1 if LAMFA map contains lean that 1 values. It means that hardcoded value is somewhere else. Unfortunately I have a few time for continue investigations.
Logged
Россия - Великая страна!
https://youtu.be/fup5GzIFdXk
vwdenisvw
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +2/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 27
« Reply #1302 on: November 24, 2020, 06:44:43 AM »
Quote from: prometey1982 on November 21, 2020, 02:05:59 PM
TABGBTS - 0x1EA9E - 16 bit. Factor 0,019531, offset -50
In your file 950 grad C.

FBSTABGM - 0x1EA7C - 16 bit 4x1. Factor 0,000031. Factor for X axis 0,019531, offset -50,000000.

KFLBTS - axis for load is at 0x1EA86. 16 bit. Factor 0,023438.

Thanks. The FABSTABGM map contains all "1". But AFR doesn't match KFLBTS. Except for the maximum values.
Today I'll fill in the modified KFLBTS and take off the logs.
Changed the ignition angle a little more. I'll try to squeeze everything out of standard components...
Logged
Volvo S60 2001 2.0T=>2.3T5=>2.0T=>d5t5
vwdenisvw
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +2/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 27
« Reply #1303 on: November 24, 2020, 07:12:04 AM »
Has anyone tried regulating afr via DLAMOB?

From NefMoto Wiki:
http://www.nefariousmotorsports.com/wiki/index.php/LAMFAW_7.100_(Driver%27s_Requested_Lambda)

DLAMOB: Engine speed sample points: Group characteristic SNM06GKUB
Map values: All are 0 ---> no additional enrichment during overboost
In the map, delta values are entered + 0.1 ---> lamfa = lamfaw – 0.1!

Setting all values ​​to the minimum of 0.0469 does not change afr. Always 1.
Logged
Volvo S60 2001 2.0T=>2.3T5=>2.0T=>d5t5
prometey1982
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +70/-60
Online Online

Posts: 323



WWW
« Reply #1304 on: November 24, 2020, 08:14:40 AM »
Quote from: vwdenisvw on November 24, 2020, 07:12:04 AM
Has anyone tried regulating afr via DLAMOB?

From NefMoto Wiki:
http://www.nefariousmotorsports.com/wiki/index.php/LAMFAW_7.100_(Driver%27s_Requested_Lambda)

DLAMOB: Engine speed sample points: Group characteristic SNM06GKUB
Map values: All are 0 ---> no additional enrichment during overboost
In the map, delta values are entered + 0.1 ---> lamfa = lamfaw – 0.1!

Setting all values ​​to the minimum of 0.0469 does not change afr. Always 1.
It's for overboost. But overboost is disabled in our BINs.
Logged
Россия - Великая страна!
https://youtu.be/fup5GzIFdXk
Pages: 1 ... 85 86 [87] 88 89 ... 182
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Navigation
Personal Tools
  • November 27, 2024, 10:45:52 PM
  • Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
    Did you miss your activation email?

    Login with username, password and session length
Search
 
Advanced Search
About Disclaimer
All Rights Reserved 2010 Nefarious Motosports
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.048 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)