MeNewbie
Full Member
Karma: +1/-2
 Offline
Posts: 50
|
 |
« Reply #1185 on: August 23, 2019, 06:46:18 AM »
|
|
|
Do we have to disable KFLDHBN and use only kfldrx or do we need to adjust HBN as well?
If we dissable KFLDHBN, does that include axis or just the actual map?
Why do you want to disable PR limit map? It is for safety. Adjust it properly. KFLDRX is solenoid linearisation duty map. You don't need to touch it at all. For stock turbo just tune KFLDIMX. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The right way to do things successfully is IDA.
|
|
|
MeNewbie
Full Member
Karma: +1/-2
Offline
Posts: 50
|
|
« Reply #1186 on: August 23, 2019, 07:00:33 AM »
|
|
|
Hi all,
thanks for your help. Understood, that means some S60R ME7 have existing damos files and others (like mine) unfortunately not.
On my car is this file (original 300PS software), see attachement. Sending .bin as soon as I found it.
Would it make sense to overwrite complete ECU with other ME7 software to use available damos?
Best
Niko
Old damos available only for V70R 512kb flash. No damos at all for 1024Kb. Your bin is latest firmware for this S60R. I disasmed it and made fully defined OLS for this software. What do you want to know? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The right way to do things successfully is IDA.
|
|
|
MeNewbie
Full Member
Karma: +1/-2
Offline
Posts: 50
|
|
« Reply #1187 on: August 23, 2019, 07:12:29 AM »
|
|
|
Digging in big injectors for Volvo. Funny to know didn't find any FKVA and KVB like in Audi for MPG cluster.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The right way to do things successfully is IDA.
|
|
|
Mladen
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 50
|
|
« Reply #1188 on: August 26, 2019, 04:33:35 AM »
|
|
|
Why do you want to disable PR limit map? It is for safety. Adjust it properly. KFLDRX is solenoid linearisation duty map. You don't need to touch it at all. For stock turbo just tune KFLDIMX.
The info that I was reading through this forum, even tho it is Audi based made me ask. Also, a few pages back another user posted his bin that had a modified HBN. I wanted to know if that made sense. I am planing on fitting a 16T. My car is a 2.5 LPT. Is KFLDIMX a overshoot map? LRDXN does not need to be changed? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Opti
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 43
|
|
« Reply #1189 on: August 26, 2019, 08:50:04 AM »
|
|
|
KFLDIMX is the I-part of the PID for the turbo control valve. You will need to adjust it to get the wanted boost. I've changed from a 13T to a 16T on my 1999 2.5T and I used the 13T waste gate actuator on the 16T in order to minimize the PID work. But I did rescale KFLDIMX in order to get the wanted boost in the higher load areas since the original map was capped at ~1550 mbar absolute pressure. If not rescaling it I found that the ECU needed to adapt during quite a long period before I got the requested boost.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mladen
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 50
|
|
« Reply #1190 on: August 27, 2019, 04:25:39 AM »
|
|
|
KFLDIMX is the I-part of the PID for the turbo control valve. You will need to adjust it to get the wanted boost. I've changed from a 13T to a 16T on my 1999 2.5T and I used the 13T waste gate actuator on the 16T in order to minimize the PID work. But I did rescale KFLDIMX in order to get the wanted boost in the higher load areas since the original map was capped at ~1550 mbar absolute pressure. If not rescaling it I found that the ECU needed to adapt during quite a long period before I got the requested boost.
Thanks for the reply. While testing, I did adjust the IMX to 12 psi or 850mbar. While I wait for the 16t to be balanced, I Put all my maps back to stock. If I wanted 1 bar or just a bit more do I have to adjust the pressure axis on KFLDIMX, since it only goes to 800mbar? Do I need to rescale KFLDHBN to the 16T as well? If so can anyone share. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Opti
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 43
|
|
« Reply #1191 on: August 27, 2019, 09:20:41 AM »
|
|
|
If you find that the ECU does not request the amount of boost that you expect from your load cap then you might need to increase KFLDHBN in the affected areas. Does the axis for your IMX really only go to 800 mbar absolute pressure? If so that sounds wrong. Is it scaled correctly?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mladen
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 50
|
|
« Reply #1192 on: August 27, 2019, 12:54:29 PM »
|
|
|
If you find that the ECU does not request the amount of boost that you expect from your load cap then you might need to increase KFLDHBN in the affected areas. Does the axis for your IMX really only go to 800 mbar absolute pressure? If so that sounds wrong. Is it scaled correctly?
I will post the map soon. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mladen
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 50
|
|
« Reply #1193 on: August 29, 2019, 03:58:04 AM »
|
|
|
Here is KFLDIMX
If I understand, I will have to modify the last entry on the X axis to 1000 instead of 800?
And then modify that row? to get 1 bar?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 29, 2019, 03:59:55 AM by Mladen »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MeNewbie
Full Member
Karma: +1/-2
Offline
Posts: 50
|
|
« Reply #1194 on: August 29, 2019, 09:14:01 AM »
|
|
|
Here is KFLDIMX
If I understand, I will have to modify the last entry on the X axis to 1000 instead of 800?
And then modify that row? to get 1 bar?
basically yes but better to modify more axis values to scale map properly |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The right way to do things successfully is IDA.
|
|
|
Mladen
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 50
|
|
« Reply #1195 on: August 29, 2019, 09:27:12 AM »
|
|
|
basically yes but better to modify more axis values to scale map properly
If I understood correctly; Since I am increasing the last row by 200, the rest should be scaled by the same %. I cant really log my tests. I do have Vida and Dice but its slowwwww. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MeNewbie
Full Member
Karma: +1/-2
Offline
Posts: 50
|
|
« Reply #1196 on: August 29, 2019, 09:30:56 AM »
|
|
|
If I understood correctly;
Since I am increasing the last row by 200, the rest should be scaled by the same %.
I cant really log my tests. I do have Vida and Dice but its slowwwww.
you can make last axis values for example 800 and 1000 mBar |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The right way to do things successfully is IDA.
|
|
|
jahko
Jr. Member
Karma: +2/-0
Offline
Posts: 47
|
|
« Reply #1197 on: August 29, 2019, 11:14:04 AM »
|
|
|
look at the 3d view and make it smooth, you can paste the values from the last column down 1 and then create your 1000 to suit.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mladen
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 50
|
|
« Reply #1198 on: August 29, 2019, 12:59:54 PM »
|
|
|
Can I control the onset of boost by adjust DIMX this way?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Opti
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 43
|
|
« Reply #1199 on: August 29, 2019, 01:19:20 PM »
|
|
|
Not sure I understand what you want to do. Do you want to control at what RPM you start building boost?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
